Sentences with phrase «over all global warming theory»

That hurts the credibility of over all global warming theory.

Not exact matches

This gradual shift in the Sahara's overall climate contradicts a common theory that the region dried rapidly over a few hundred years, and provides clues about a potential re-greening triggered by global warming, Kröpelin says.

Re # 8 (and to expand on # 13): I also think that a basic strategy of the global warming deniers is to focus on one aspect of the science over which there is some combination of real and manufactured dispute and then try to make people think that this is the one crucial piece of evidence on which the whole theory of anthropogenic warming rests... and thus that the dispute over this aspect throws the whole theory into question.

And on that — the predictions — the theory of global warming seems to falter: Carbon dioxide emissions are growing faster than ever, especially from the Chinese over the past decade.

There are a variety of reasons that the media tend to pay outsize attention to research developments that support a «hot» conclusion (like the theory that hurricanes have already been intensified by human - caused global warming) and glaze over on research of equivalent quality that does not.

I have no idea what you are referring to, except perhaps that the rote regurgitation of long - since and many - times - over debunked denialist nonsense is mercifully (and no doubt laboriously) deleted by the RC moderators — unlike every other open blog on the Internet where any attempt to discuss the science of anthropogenic global warming is quickly drowned out by a torrent of pseudoscience, conspiracy theories, blatant falsehoods, and hate speech against climate scientists.

The fact is the scientific theory of human - caused global warming is over 100 years old.

To explain the universally acknowledged lack of warming over the last 17 years in defiance of all UN climate theories, government - funded «climate scientists» and the UN have increasingly touted what critics ridicule as «The Theory of The Ocean Ate My Global Warming.warming over the last 17 years in defiance of all UN climate theories, government - funded «climate scientists» and the UN have increasingly touted what critics ridicule as «The Theory of The Ocean Ate My Global Warming.Warming.»

Peter Foster: Crazy over climate The Royal Society, the U.K.'s once - venerable academy of science, has arguably lost its collective mind over the theory of projected catastrophic man - made global warming.

The Goddard Institute has played a very prominent role on both sides of the debate over man - made global warming theory.

(3) Does the absence of warming over the past 15 years disprove the alarmists» theories about catastrophic global warming and, if not, why not?

Had the AGW hypothesis been subject to the proper scientific method, the failure to substantiate this fundamental premise (of increased warming in the troposphere over the Equator) would have rendered the man - made global warming theory invalid.

The fundamental flaw in the anthropogenic global warming theory is the missing hotspot in the troposphere over the tropics, see David Evans»: http://sciencespeak.com/MissingSignature.pdf

Yet another attempt to gloss over this fundamental weakness in the man - made global warming theory is made in a recent paper by Peter W. Thorne, John R. Lanzante, Thomas C. Peterson, Dian J. Seidel and Keith P. Shine: Tropospheric temperature trends: history of an ongoing controversy.

Earlier this month, a New York Times article by Andy Revkin voiced concern over a gap between «the consensus» of climate scientists and public acceptance of the theory of human - caused global warming.

The scientific theory of global warming due to IR absorption and scattering due to CO2 is a mere hypothesis: this is false, as over 100 years of research into how the climate works and the physical properties of CO2 has shown.

Ender: It is interesting that you say Global Warming is back to being a theory I thought the debate was over!

Just yesterday, a peer reviewed paper was published which shows that the positive feedbacks that global warming theory depends on to predict a climate catastrophe, have been up until now vastly over stated.

By Anil Dawar Fresh doubts were cast over controversial global warming theories yesterday after a major climate change argument was discredited.

Nonetheless, both of these potential problems are in keeping with the main point of this essay, which is that the science is not «settled» and there is actually quite a lot of debate over man - made global warming theory within the scientific community.

In the Comment by Nuccitelli et al., they make many false and invalid criticisms of the CFC - warming theory in my recent paper, and claim that their anthropogenic forcings including CO2 would provide a better explanation of the observed global mean surface temperature (GMST) data over the past 50 years.

The whole problem with the theory that cosmic rays (or lack thereof) are driving global warming is that cosmic radiation has shown no trend over the last 50 years.

Radiation budgets are a central component of global warming theory, and have been addressed for over a century.

Vis.: [Coby]: «In the case of the theory of Anthropogenic Global Warming, what we do have is a theory (first conceived over 100 years ago) that is based on well established laws of physics...».

In the case of anthropogenic global warming, there is a theory (first conceived over 100 years ago) based on well - established laws of physics.

Viscount Christopher Monckton of Brenchley, a well - known sceptic of man made global warming theory, has made a complaint to the police over a prize - winning art work which he describes as a «death threat.»

We believe that our results show that the debate over the man - made global warming theory is indeed now «over».

It doesn't matter because the common sense of the average person tells them that their global warming theory is «frozen over.»

However, mounting evidence against climate change theory and the «consensus» is unlikely to stem the tide of policy designed to combat global warming, thanks to the sheer size of the climate change industry that has built up over the last few decades.

In a number of past posts over at Coyote Blog, I have noticed the phenomenon of published studies whose data does nothing to bolster the theory of anthropogenic global warming adding in a line or two in the article saying that «of course the author's support anthorpogenic global warming theory» in the same way movies routinely assure audiences that «no animals were hurt in the filiming of this movie.»

It will also be interesting to see plaintiffs explain this graph of accumulated cyclone energy in the light of their theory that man - made global warming is increasing hurricane strengths and frequencies (ACE is a sort of integration of hurricane and tropical storm strengths over time).

Over the past few weeks I have had many opportunities to discuss the theory of anthropogenic global warming with a variety of people.

Traditional global warming theory would suggest winter warming trends, but several regions such as those we deal with here have a negative trend in temperature over the last 25 years.

This has never made much sense in the context of greenhouse warming theory (though its proponents have tied themselves into pretzels trying to explain it) since global warming theory (as embodied in the last IPCC report) holds that the largest temperature gains should be in the lower troposphere over the tropics, and offers no reason why the warming in the Artic should be orders of magnitude larger than in the Antarctic.

Current results continue to be fairly consistent with my personal theory, that man - made CO2 may add 0.5 - 1C to global temperatures over the next century (below alarmist estimates), but that this warming may be swamped at times by natural climactic fluctuations that alarmists tend to under - estimate.

global warming theory (as embodied in the last IPCC report) holds that the largest temperature gains should be in the lower troposphere over the tropics, and offers no reason why the warming in the Artic should be orders of magnitude larger than in the Antarctic.

The politicisation and hype of the theory of Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) over the last 30 years that created the Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming (CAGW) delusion and panic, could result in a backlash from the public, politicians and media that damages the reputation of all sciences.

Ocean acidification was supposed to be their Siegfried Line — the final line of defense if, as has grown increasingly obvious over the last few years, «anthropogenic global warming» theory proved to be a busted flush.

According to «The Great Global Warming Swindle», produced by Martin Durkin and broadcast on the UK Channel 4, human - triggered climate change is merely a conspiracy theory, designed by over 2000 climate scientists, the world's leading climate research organizations and the Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change to prevent the world's poor nations from developing.

If the anthropogenic global warming theory was correct, the infrared «back - radiation» should have instead increased year - round over the past 14 years along with the steady rise in atmospheric carbon dioxide.