Though they have played out on a fairly small stage, with relatively little national notice, the struggles
over climate policy in Washington presage larger national battles.
Not exact matches
On Monday, as Irma weakened
over Georgia, Bossert used a White House briefing to offer more hints of an emerging
climate resilience
policy, while notably avoiding accepting
climate change science: «What President Trump is committed to is making sure that federal dollars aren't used to rebuild things that will be
in harm's way later or that won't be hardened against the future predictable floods that we see.
The challenge
in prompting change — broadening the classic definition of «infrastructure,» and investing
in initiatives aimed at adapting to a turbulent planet — is heightened by partisan divisions
over climate policy and development.
Alice Hill, who directed resilience
policy for the National Security Council
in the Obama administration, said the wider debate
over cutting
climate - warming emissions may have distracted people from promptly pursuing ways to reduce risks and economic and societal costs from natural disasters.
But the current economic
climate is challenging for several reasons, including the mop - up project
in the wake of the extraordinary
policy decisions
over the last decade.
There's also $ 135.4 million (
over four years, starting
in 2018) to the two lead departments, Environment and
Climate Change Canada and Natural Resources Canada, for «policy, communications and engagement» for the climat
Climate Change Canada and Natural Resources Canada, for «
policy, communications and engagement» for the
climateclimate plan.
Over the course of our conversations, I came to see Obama as a president who has grown steadily more fatalistic about the constraints on America's ability to direct global events, even as he has, late
in his presidency, accumulated a set of potentially historic foreign -
policy achievements — controversial, provisional achievements, to be sure, but achievements nonetheless: the opening to Cuba, the Paris
climate - change accord, the Trans - Pacific Partnership trade agreement, and, of course, the Iran nuclear deal.
New York Governor Andrew Cuomo was protested
in Albany on April 23
over his
policies on the environment and
climate change.
TransCanada pledged to seek another permit for its Keystone XL pipeline after the Obama administration rejected the project, ending a seven - year review that had become a flash point
in the debate
over his
climate policies.
Soon after the delay to the decision was announced by Hoon last Christmas, the Miliband and Benn camps both contacted the Institute for Public
Policy Research,
over a pamphlet by Simon Retallack, the IPPR's head of
climate change, arguing that the third runway should not go ahead unless the government required aircraft using it to meet the aviation industry's own targets to cut carbon dioxide emissions and noise
in new aircraft by 50 % and nitrogen oxides by 80 % by 2020.
Over the long term, he worries that
climate skeptics
in the
policy world, after dismissing
climate change as a risk
in recent years, could later change positions and say it was real, embracing
climate engineering «as this magic solution that could solve the problem.»
A new analysis of global energy use, economics and the
climate shows that without new
climate policies, expanding the current bounty of inexpensive natural gas alone would not slow the growth of global greenhouse gas emissions worldwide
over the long term, according to a study appearing today
in Nature.
The Society credits Merkel for boosting German research funding and for «the leadership she has provided on the European and world stages
in promoting science - based
policy making
over issues such as
climate change.»
Depending on how
climate impacts unequally affect the rich or poor within every region, the optimal
policy may involve a lenient or sharp increase
in the price of carbon
over the next decades (lenient when impacts are proportional to income, sharp when impacts are concentrated on the poor).
«Given his background,» Cohan adds, «Jason would have been a leading voice on health care and adherence to evidence
in debates
over climate and energy
policy.»
The committee has prepared a report that,
in my view, provides
policy makers and the scientific community with a critical view of surface temperature reconstructions and how they are evolving
over time, as well as a good sense of how important our understanding of the paleoclimate temperature record is within the overall state of scientific knowledge on global
climate change.
«From a
policy perspective, we have to recognize that we have been trending toward drier conditions
over the last 1,500 years and the warming
in Nevada is only going to exacerbate that trend,» he said, noting that «warmer temperatures cause more soil moisture to evaporate so you amplify the effects of drought when
climate is warming.
Many of the youth
in the room were leaders who were instrumental
in LAUSD's passing the Student
Climate Bill of Rights, which favors alternatives that promote positive behavior
over punitive school discipline
policies.
Though the School
Climate Bill of Rights was passed
in 2013, discipline
policy reform has been
in the works
in Los Angeles for
over a decade.
Climate Change: Current climate change policies and actions in Kenya, and world - over, do not provide effective support for community engagement in decision making, nor sustainable livelihoods and environmental conser
Climate Change: Current
climate change policies and actions in Kenya, and world - over, do not provide effective support for community engagement in decision making, nor sustainable livelihoods and environmental conser
climate change
policies and actions
in Kenya, and world -
over, do not provide effective support for community engagement
in decision making, nor sustainable livelihoods and environmental conservation.
Whether or not the backers are directly linked to the oil industry, they reflect how the fight
over energy
policy remains highly polarized, well financed (on both sides), and — so far — has resulted
in few
policies that oil markets or the
climate system are likely to notice any time soon.
@ 196 Ray... John Howard is an EX politician and former PM who lost his seat
in 2007 primarily
over Climate Change inaction and asylum seeker
policies.
The pricing
policy that would achieve
climate objectives with the least cost to the economy would begin modestly and ramp up predictably
over time, allowing capital stock to turn
over in a more
climate - benign way without prematurely scrapping it.
In part because of the findings in the climate panel's reports over two decades, policy makers are slowly respondin
In part because of the findings
in the climate panel's reports over two decades, policy makers are slowly respondin
in the
climate panel's reports
over two decades,
policy makers are slowly responding.
We debated whether the Democratic platform tussle
over a carbon price and natural gas
policy between Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton, resolved a few days ago, was the last gasp of
climate change as a big issue
in the presidential campaign.
I was somewhat involuntarily thrust into the center of the public debate
over climate change at this very time, when the «Hockey Stick» temperature reconstruction I co-authored, depicting the unprecedented nature of modern warming
in at least the past millennium, developed into an icon
in the debate
over human - caused
climate change [particularly when it was featured
in the Summary for
Policy Makers (SPM) of the Third Assessment Report of the IPCC
in 2001].
During 2005 talks
over the
climate treaty
in Montreal, for example, the National Center for Public
Policy Research, a group opposing emissions restrictions, tried to illustrate its view of carbon markets by handing out mock emissions credits.
* The role of the US
in global efforts to address pollutants that are broadly dispersed across national borders, such as greenhouse gasses, persistent organic pollutants, ozone, etc...; * How they view a president's ability to influence national science
policy in a way that will persist beyond their term (s), as would be necessary for example to address global
climate change or enhancement of science education nationwide; * Their perspective on the relative roles that scientific knowledge, ethics, economics, and faith should play
in resolving debates
over embryonic stem cell research, evolution education, human population growth, etc... * What specific steps they would take to prevent the introduction of political or economic bias
in the dissemination and use of scientific knowledge; * (and many more...)
However, it is not hard to see that some of those who have attempted to perpetrate this tale about man - made global warming are more interested
in climate change as a way of increasing the power of government
over all of our lives instead of implementing a sensible energy
policy.
The news release — appended below — says it all, and the findings it describes reinforce my assertion awhile back that there's plenty of denial to go around
in the arguments
over climate and energy trends and
policies.
«There will be a big battle
over just about everything with this,» said Dan Weiss,
climate strategy director at the Center for American Progress, a
policy group
in Washington that advises Democrats.
If you're looking for a
policy solution you're talking about a different mix of individual behaviors of lots of citizens
in very different
climates all
over the country.
However, it is not hard to see that some of those who have attempted to perpetrate the concept of man - made global warming are more interested
in climate change as a way of increasing the power of government
over all of our lives instead of implementing a sensible energy
policy.
Such moments of consensus are rarely visible given how the heated fight
over climate and energy
policy is mainly shaped, particularly
in Washington, as a political tug of war.
Mike Hulme, a
climate scientist at the University of East Anglia in England and the author of a book on the struggle over climate policy, «Why We Disagree About Climate Change,» said that big gatherings of world leaders were less likely to bear fruit than splitting the challenge into pieces that are tractable, and focusing directly on addressing those pr
climate scientist at the University of East Anglia
in England and the author of a book on the struggle
over climate policy, «Why We Disagree About Climate Change,» said that big gatherings of world leaders were less likely to bear fruit than splitting the challenge into pieces that are tractable, and focusing directly on addressing those pr
climate policy, «Why We Disagree About
Climate Change,» said that big gatherings of world leaders were less likely to bear fruit than splitting the challenge into pieces that are tractable, and focusing directly on addressing those pr
Climate Change,» said that big gatherings of world leaders were less likely to bear fruit than splitting the challenge into pieces that are tractable, and focusing directly on addressing those problems.
As debates
over national and global
climate and energy
policy continue to drag out, there's been an intensifying exploration of
climate miscommunication among those seeking concrete actions that will make a noticeable difference
in the atmosphere someday.
If you have a dark sense of humor and need a chuckle to deal with such news, particularly
in light of the ongoing stasis
over international and United States
policy on
climate and energy, have a look at Marc Roberts's latest cartoon posting, which is from his archives but all too relevant.
Over all,
in considering
policy options related to African progress, it's vital to keep
in mind that the
climate history of peri-Saharan regions includes millenniums - long patterns of mega-drought far more extreme than anything experienced
in modern times.
This is one reason the
policy debate, essentially
over how much to invest
in a
climate insurance
policy, remains turbulent.
The first group of authors tries to label the
climate science community as an army of influential catastrophists, alarmists, and profiteers — glossing
over the reality that the vast body of
climate science and
climate policy analysis is, as
in any field, full of gradations (not to mention that there's not much evidence of substantial influence).
It's important to note that there's also sometimes a kind of «false inequivalence»
in the fight
over climate science and
policies — an implication that the lack of action on greenhouse gases is largely the result of the unfair advantage
in money and influence held by industries dealing
in, or dependent on, fossil fuels.
In an appearance last week at Purdue University I was on a panel with Roger Pielke, Jr., of the University of Colorado and Judith Curry of the Georgia Institute of Technology exploring the heated state of the debate
over climate science and
policy.
These other factors include the economy, confusion
over colder weather and other perceptual biases, general distrust of government,
climate policies such as cap and trade that are not easily sold as effective or
in line with public values, the absence of White House leadership on the issue, institutional barriers
in Congress and at the international level, and the continued communication and
policy missteps of some scientists and environmental advocates.
Try to find slide one — depicting the online tussle
over climate science and
policy — within slide two, which places the first issue
in the flow of the moment's news (via the fascinating newsmap.jp Web site):
The last few days have seen frenzied volleys
in the fight
over climate science and
policy, beginning with a 16 - author op - ed article
in The Wall Street Journal on Friday and, most recently, with a 39 - author rebuttal published today
in the paper.
Specialized reporters have tracked the developments
in climate science and the
policy debates
over the implications of that science.
As a member of the NCC First
Climate together with representatives from
over 160 of the world's leading organizations, spanning business, finance, accounting, conservation, academia, and
policy, under the roof of the Natural Capital Coalition, took part
in the central launch ceremony
in London.
We'll be arguing
over climate policy for a long time to come — but more and more,
in my opinion, it will be about
policy, and not about the existence of the problem.
The Heartland Institute is a fossil fuel - funded front group with
over $ 800,000
in contributions from fossil fuel interests that has routinely attacked clean energy
policies and the science behind
climate change.
We have gone back and forth on when Hansen knew that CFCs would probably decrease
over time, but if one recalls that Hansen is a political animal and seemingly interested first and foremost
in policy and further that these scenarios were revealed to a Congressional hearing on
climate, it takes no great imagination to assume that he put a scenario out there that might just scare and attract attention and particularly if he can see that that scenario may be called «business as usual».