Sentences with phrase «over evil in»

Narrator: We have to show a united front (pauses) knowing that good, through education, will prevail over evil in the end.

Dussera celebrates the victory of the power of God over evil in our world.

Some Jews interpret resurrection not as God's triumph over death but as the individual's ethical victory over evil in the world and in himself.

Therefore, he will not — indeed, he can not — choose good over evil in the spiritual realm.

The forces of evil conspired to defeat God, but he was able to triumph over evil in the end by raising up Jesus as the Christ.

The question confronting us is how do societies get over the evils in their past and how do they change for the better?

Not exact matches

Gould once told an interviewer in 1966 that live audiences were a «force of evil» because pleasing them took precedence over his pursuit of perfection.

While the company amassed an army of fanboy followers over much of its history as the underdog in the epic struggle against the «evil empire» (Microsoft), it's perhaps understandable that haters are now popping out of the woodwork.

Super Evil Megacorp COO and executive director Kristian Segerstrale says livestreaming has exploded for Vainglory, with over one million unique viewers tuning in to matches in September alone.

Behind the scenes, though, he has fretted over the «evil» things Trump might do in areas like immigration, while Pichai has publicly criticized the White House for its executive orders targeting majority - Muslim countries.

In Austin Powers: The Spy Who Shagged Me, Dr. Evil's team briefly abandons its traditional hostage - taking tactics and conspires to instead take over the world...

I understand that a post-secondary education can be very expensive (I worked two jobs and had many different entrepreneurial ventures and I still graduated with over $ 20,000 in student loan debt which is now all paid off by the way) and taking on debt is a necessary evil for some.

it cracks me up that people would be respectful to any god that would offer up their own son in blood scarifice, not a kind and benevolent, all knowing god, an evil and hateful god, we would be better off overing respects to santa clause, to my knowledge all he does is disappoint from time to time ive never known him to kill and destroy mankind by divers and sundry forms of cruel punishment.

The film is also clear that JPII did not see the Cold War in terms of Evil Empire A v. Evil Empire B; instead, he sided with the Americans over the Soviets.

let alone the god they present, one who could have created any kind of world he wanted, like an author who has complete control over what shows up in a fictional work; why would god then giddily create / allow so much pain and evil?

Either that or God has relinquished control over his creation in order to allow Satan to tempt, kill, maim, seduce, and otherwise bring evil into a world where it is neither welcome nor wanted.

And oh yes, there's that part in Revelation (the last few chapters) where God simply «must» release Satan again, after killing all the «evil» people and having Jesus reign on earth for an eon over all the «good» people that are left.

I am reminded of what Jesus said about the purest form of religion being taking care of the most vulnerable of society with widows and orphans and to keep from being polluted by evil, in this case the love of money over meeting the needs of the poor.

In Hawthorne's tale vice and providence together render judgment, but it is a slow, steady hand that rights evils over the course of centuries.

Regardless of your views, I still have my personal faith, you may condemn me as simple minded or living in a fantasy world, but having witnessed first hand good triumphing over evil, I shall leave you to decide your own journey in life.

The Church, however, has consistently taught over the centuries that the direct and intentional taking of innocent human life, as in abortion, is a grave and intrinsic evil.

When discussing the possible existence of objective (divine) «truths», truthfollower over and over appeals to his audience with various examples attempting to get the reader to agree to a non-qualifed value of «evil / incorrect / bad / good», as if this will lock in an agreement of an objective «truth» value (without it being explicitly specified).

And cometh that match, Jesus shall laugh in glee as the faithful, filled with His love, gouge the eyes from the atheists and kicketh them where men should not be kicked, and smash them over the head with conveniently available folding chairs, just like in Professional Wrestling, and others of the saved shall hoot and holler and watch NASCAR on giant Jesus flatscreens and the atheists do much wailing and gnashing of teeth and stubbing of toes and get nasty hangnails for their evil sins.

But over the last 25 years we have gotten much more clarity about the role of evil in the context of abuse.

Or is it that Evil is more like Anakin Skywalker being taken over by the «Dark Side» where the Evil that is in Anakin is manifested through the human Anakin and he becomes the evil Darth VaEvil is more like Anakin Skywalker being taken over by the «Dark Side» where the Evil that is in Anakin is manifested through the human Anakin and he becomes the evil Darth VaEvil that is in Anakin is manifested through the human Anakin and he becomes the evil Darth Vaevil Darth Vadar.

Our first hopeful objectives as humans is to decide that Good id better than Evil and that we want to be part of one over the other (while humanity is making strides in this regard through the help of God, we're still not there yet).

The underlying concern here has vexed theologians for centuries: How can evil happen in a world that is lorded over by a good and all - powerful God?

Every time I give in to a fearful thought, I am taking a bite from the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil all over again.

No human hands (he means) prepare the weapon by which the power of evil in the world will ultimately be overthrown: it is the act of God alone, whose kingdom will then be effective over all creation.

I bring this all up in response to your article, over the fact that what was done to Jesus is an evil thing.

«In spite of all the evil that has been done by the church, I'm still disposed to trust the community of faithful over the long haul.

Ideas such as the Kingdom of God are expressions of confidence in the ultimate triumph of community, i.e., in the long - run victory of good over evil, or the final establishment of progress.

Jeremiah, pouring out before God everything he felt, poured out his vindictiveness: «Bring upon them the day of evil, and destroy them with double destruction»; (Jeremiah 17:18) «Deliver up their children to the famine, and give them over to the power of the sword; and let their wives become childless, and widows; and let their men be slain of death, and their young men smitten of the sword in battle....

In other words, to say that the Holocaust is objectively morally evil is to say that even if the Nazis had taken over the world and brainwashed everyone into believing that the Holocaust was morally good, it would still be morally evil.

«If I keep posting the love of God will prevail over the evil on this post» or the «devil in the midst.»

28 And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient; 29 Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers, 30 Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, 31 Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful: 32 Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.

Violence can also mark a victory over evil, as in «The Twelve Brothers,» where the villainess lands in «a barrel full of boiling oil and poisonous snakes.»

It has been the children of satan who always hav plans so that Christ in their eyes can not come back, and they use stupid plans and blow themelves up, and do all manner of evil, but GOD IS GOD AND NO HUMAN OR SATAN CAN BE VICTORIOUS OVER YHWVH OF ISRAEL.

Emil Brunner has distinguished five major themes in which the significance of the death of Christ is described.6 There is the sacrifice, the ransom, the penal suffering, the victory over evil powers, and the symbol of the Paschal Lamb.

Of course, I'm sure that the «unclean desires» that God gives the evil over to are just «cultural» and not REALLY unclean in God's eyes.

THAT»S what Christ's message was about — the victory of God over evil, not just in the world, not just in hell, but in human beings too.

'» (90) The prevailing attitude, he shows, is heavily influenced by the Platonic concept of an evil material world and a perfect immaterial soul, as well as a misunderstanding of Scripture in which heaven, (as a kind of final resting place for the soul), is emphasized over the clear biblical picture of a new heaven and new earth for which believers will be physically resurrected.

There is potential harm, however, in perpetuating a popular religion of «the Devil» in which evil is seen as being typically victorious over good in our daily lives.

Partly to provide a way of conceptualizing God's transcendence over evil, and in part for other systemic reasons which we need not cover now, Hartshorne is forced to introduce a dualistic account of the divine nature.

A perusal of the Church of the Brethren Web pages provides clear evidence that a commitment to pacifism is not limited to denominational headquarters: the 48 churches of the Northern Indiana District Conference have joined to urge «the use of nonviolent approaches and interventions» in response to the terror; the Elizabethtown, Pennsylvania, Church of the Brethren has adopted a statement in which they «remain committed to walk in the Jesus way of nonviolent love, in which evil can only be overcome with redemptive acts of love»; a group of Brethren Volunteer Service Workers have issued a statement in which they «advocate the use of nonviolent means to settle disputes» and «stand opposed to the increased drive toward militarization»; on October 7 members of local Brethren churches (along with Mennonites and others) organized a peace rally at the state capitol in Harrisburg, «Sowing Seeds of Peace: Prayers and Petitions for Nonviolent Action,» which attracted over 300 people.

Ro 1:28 And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient; 29 Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers, 30 Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, 31 Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful: 32 Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.

Evil in this scheme is not a separate principle but an undue predominance of one force over the other, especially an imbalance so great that it can no longer be corrected through a religious renewal.

Rather than viewing it as a decision made for the sake of living a life free from the world's demands, Augustine agonized over the «evils» of sexuality in a doctrinal context that virtually denied the human capacity for free moral decision.

Not sure i am convinced because how do you explain the verse an eye for an eye in the old testament there have always been consequences for wrong doing and stiill are for sin.If we believe the word then that word is from God not satan.As far as satan is concerned he uses violence as his tools of trade he works on our fears and is limited to robbing stealing and destroying he does nt have anything else.Violence confirms to us that there is a spiritual battle going on both on the earthly plane and in the heavenlys and the battle is over souls.The verse the kingdon of heaven is expanding and violent people take it by force is referring to that spiritual battle and as satan uses violence to expand his dominion so does God use violence to counter him.So what does he mean by that term for me i think it is saying that the the force of evil that satan uses or violence is overcome by a greater violence or force a more powerful one that being the Love of Christ.Through the cross we see that clearly portrayed and in our lives that very same battle is still happening right now for dominion be clear if we walk in the flkesh satan will have dominion over us but if we walk according to the spirit and abide in Christ we have freedom from our old nature.and satan.He can oppose us but he wont be able to influence us if we are in Christ.

So as a parent then you allow evil to trample all over your children so you can come in and save them and be the hero.