Sentences with phrase «over evolution in»

Not exact matches

In a conversation with Fortune, Gupta talks about the evolution of the venture ecosystem over the last decade and his firm's contrarian approach when it comes to investing in early - stage companieIn a conversation with Fortune, Gupta talks about the evolution of the venture ecosystem over the last decade and his firm's contrarian approach when it comes to investing in early - stage companiein early - stage companies.
In the book Becoming Steve Jobs: The Evolution of a Reckless Upstart Into a Visionary Leader, authors Brent Schlender and Rick Tetzeli draw on extensive interviews — conducted over the course of their journalistic careers — to depict the life of the Apple co-founder.
Over the past few years, Starbucks has diversified its offerings, acquiring Evolution Fresh juice in 2011, Teavana in 2012, and launching soda brand Fizzio last year.
From the first magazine published in 1741, to the first billboards in the late 1800s, the art of getting the public's attention and turning it into sales has gone through a dramatic evolution over the past few hundred years.
More seriousness: The new update will add new trainer gameplay wrinkles to encounters, new «evolution» items (you can «evolve» your Pokémon over time), two new berries (one to slow a Pokémon's movements and another to amp up catch rewards) and new outfits and accessories to garb your trainer in.
The guidelines reflect the evolution in types and prevalence of devices used by passengers over the past decade.
They're tech savvy and interested in being part of the process over the evolution of this technology.
In physical terms, for example, wings and eyes have independently emerged among animals through evolution at several different times over, and birds in ecologically isolated New Zealand have evolved behaviors typically seen in mammals elsewherIn physical terms, for example, wings and eyes have independently emerged among animals through evolution at several different times over, and birds in ecologically isolated New Zealand have evolved behaviors typically seen in mammals elsewherin ecologically isolated New Zealand have evolved behaviors typically seen in mammals elsewherin mammals elsewhere.
In June 2015, we paused to look back at our evolution over 40 years.
Frank Frausto is a Google veteran of over 14 years and has experienced first - hand the evolution of the world's most recognizable startup from a private valuation of $ 18 billion in 2003 to today's market capitalization of $ 740 billion.
Being in the unique position of being able to look back on over a dozen years of involvement with persona development strategy, I see the evolution of the Social Business Persona addressing what user personas and buyer personas can not do on their own standing.
We are still in very early stages of the evolution of cryptocurrencies with over 1300 right now and many taking off big in 2017.
Evolution, the age of the earth, the nature of the universe itself, etc., has been investigated and tested and findings challenged, refined, and verified in thousands of different ways by thousands of people over centuries and across continents.
Biologists define evolution as a change in the gene pool of a population over time.
Evolution makes predictions about what we would expect to see in the fossil record, comparative anatomy, genetic sequences, geographical distribution of species, etc., and these predictions have been verified many times over.
We can observe the earth is much older, and that evolution over time has played a fundamental process in complex life on earth.
Evolution is simply the observed changes in species over time as they adapt and improve to survive.
The emergence of Evangelical Catholicism is a Spirit - led development reflecting the cultural contingencies of history, like other such evolutions over the past two millennia: the evolution from the primitive Church to the Church of the Fathers; the evolution from patristic Catholicism to medieval Catholicism; the development of Counter-Reformation Catholicism (the Church in which anyone over sixty today was raised) from medieval Catholicism.
you sir are practicing a religion one that means so much to you that you use it as your online name also please show me where I call you a fool or is telling someone not to make a fool of themself the same as calling them a fool which would mean you are very religious as far as Colin he said nothing that related to the debate I was in with you... we are talking about Atheism as a religious view not debating the existence of God now look over the definitions I have shown you and please explain how Atheism does not fit into the said definitions And you claim that evolution is true so the burden of proof falls in your lap as it is the base of your religion.
I know it is not actually covered in the Bible so you may not know this but Darwin did not create the theory of evolution he merely built on the research of others who had been postulating such a thing for over 300 years.
Dave Well maybe if you ask our Topher if he would want to see young earth creation or ID taught in schools over evolution then would you understand my concerns.
Over the long haul (and evolution is all about the long haul) there are rewards (and thus replication) for both the conservative (caution, trust in the elders, traditional practices) and the innovative (curiosity, exploration, experimentation), so each of us inherits a built - in tug - of - war in the att ¡ tude department.
Well exactly Abishai, if you consider the number of Christians and Muslims in the world and where the live geographically, one could estimate over 75 % of world states do not believe in evolution.
The trial set modernists, who said evolution was consistent with religion, against fundamentalists who said the word of God as revealed in the Bible took priority over all human knowledge.»
its time for a new evolution in human thought, one that favors truth over all otheir things.
Dala, you believe (as I understand) in evolution and the accepted conclusion that the earth is over 4B years old.
Don't misunderstand me; some evolutionists (particularly some of the neo-atheists like Richard Dawkins, who argues in his new book people who don't believe in evolution are on the same level as Holocaust deniers) have gone ape over their theory (forgive the pun) to the point that they seem to forget it is a theory, and refer to it as if it is an undeniable scientific fact.
Also, evolution need not be responsible for changes in skin color over the centuries.
No objective evidence has been found in over a century that refutes evolution.
Since no one has yet to SEE an atom, the idea of the structure of the atom can only be inferred by experimental evidence — yet I see no Republican trying to stop teaching the structure of the atom in school — oh that's right, its because major corporations and industries rely on this science (pharm, weapons manufacturers etc etc) whereas the theory of evolution is merely think piece of scientists on how life on Earth changes over time.
Did I read your posting right... «If a frog gets turned into a prince in an instant it's called a fairy - tale... if a frog get's turned into a prince over a million years it's called evolution
Victory over death has been won for us by Christ on the cross: «In the context of Christian faith, the drama of evolution merges inseparably with the (abysmal) death and (grounding) resurrection of Jesus and, in him, with the eternal drama that is the Trinitarian life of God.&raquIn the context of Christian faith, the drama of evolution merges inseparably with the (abysmal) death and (grounding) resurrection of Jesus and, in him, with the eternal drama that is the Trinitarian life of God.&raquin him, with the eternal drama that is the Trinitarian life of God.»
Evolution the fact is defined as a change in allele frequency in a population over time.
It was claimed that the mind which meditates the concept of evolution profoundly will find that nothing is left uncounted for... This can be done, the nervous system organised into the brain, the functions of the glands, the influence of the subconscious mind etc., all this and anything else one cares to add in qualification can take over the role of the so - called «spiritual in the personality of man.
Science does explain all your questions, you just simply refuse to believe that evolution, over millions and billions of years, could result in the wonderful world we live in.
So last night our own Peter Lawler debated leading Darwinian Conservative Larry Arnhart here at RIT over the explanatory power of Darwinian evolution to capture to the totality of human experience in general and American political experience in particular.
The American Association for the Advancement of Science, the world's largest general scientific society with more than 130,000 members and over 262 affiliated societies and academies of science including over 10 million individuals, has made several statements and issued several press releases in support of evolution.
Recent debates in the pages of First Thingsand other conservative journals over Darwin's theory of evolution and creationism reveal the degree to which Catholics seem stuck in the trees for want of seeing the forest, the lopsided degree to which the Church gives assent to philosophy without deeply exploring the particular science it considers a threat, (this journal, it goes without saying, excepted).
Whatever roles philosophical and theological ideas played in the debates over heliocentrism, biological evolution, and the Big Bang theory, the scientific issues were eventually settled by more and better data and by considerations that were purely «scientific» in the modern sense.
I believe that no one does the math — the logic of math is in favour of creation over evolution — «random chance» aka evolution is mathematically to astounding to believe — Alfred Hoyles number don't lie... and dna is a code — random chance can not create a code sequence nor can random chance ever improve itself... just think about it — mathmatically speaking there is a god or creator or creators of the code for life.
How does evolution explain the complete joy I feel when I get off my knees in the morning thanking my God for his blessings and turning my day over to him?
For more complex organisms it takes a lot longer... we won't see it in primates over the 150 years or so we have been observing evolution.
You are confusing evolution — change in inherited characteristics of a population over successive generations, with the Origin of the universe.
All the theory of evolution says is that life forms adapt to changes in the environment over time; that there are global changes in the gene pool of a given population of animals over time.
Evolution was not correctly taught if you believe that it is a belief or a mere theory in the colloquial sense, that it unnecessarily complicates the world, and that understanding how organisms change over time is not crucial for environmental policy, agriculture and biomedical research.
So how do those who deny evolution explain the human remains found in archaeological digs, having been radio - carbon dated, in some cases over two million years?
The International Theological Commission (ITC), an advisory body to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, addressed the topic in Le Diaconat: Evolution et Perspectives, a formal study conducted over ten years, completed in 2002, and published early in 2003.
I believe in evolution but I must say that I would believe in the Christian form of creationism over the pastafarian version of it.
A common way to use the term evolution is simply to describe the change in the gene pool of a population over time; that this occurs is an indisputable fact.
In myh experience most thing evolution is some «random» change that occurs over time for no reason at all.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z