Bringing evidence and systems thinking to the debate
over fossil fuel production, the renewable energy transition, and the role of energy in modern life.
Not exact matches
Indeed, a recent research report from New Zealand's National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA) found that the majority of methane released in the air
over the last 10 years likely came from agricultural sources (cow burps) as opposed to
fossil fuel production.
Development of cost - effective means to separate carbon dioxide during the
production process will improve this advantage
over other
fossil fuels and enable the economic
production of gas resources with higher carbon dioxide content that would be too costly to recover using current carbon capture technologies, Tour said.
A boom in domestic natural gas
production, historically low prices, and increased scrutiny
over fossil fuels» carbon emissions.
If
production continues as planned,
over the next couple of decades natural gas could supplant coal as the leading domestic
fossil fuel, serving as a cleaner way to heat our homes and fire our electric plants.
So the overall cost spread
over time would be roughly equal to the price of the
fossil fuel infrastructure, maintenance and
production.
Over the course of the past three years, overall CO2 emissions from the
production of
fossil fuels have remained flat while the economy has grown, on average, at a rate of 3.1 percent.
Or does the current back - patting
over increased domestic
production ignore a bigger question: shouldn't we be curbing our reliance on
fossil fuels altogether?
J&D also note that by transitioning to more efficient technologies (for example, battery electric vehicles
over the internal combustion engine, electric heat pumps for homes, and solar thermal energy with storage to provide baseload power rather than
fossil fuels and nuclear) we can actually reduce global power
production by 30 % compared to business - as - usual.
There are immense direct and indirect public benefits in transitioning to an efficient renewable energy system in terms of reduced incidence of diseases such as asthma, freeing up of most of the supplies of water that are now used for thermal electricity generation (and hence reduced conflict
over water), reduced air, water, and soil pollution that accompanies
fossil fuel production, processing and use, and greatly improved prospects of avoiding the worst consequences of climate change.
Another gem is mentioning that not a word has come up in the presidential debates about global warming and in the last debate Romney and Obama were competing
over who could increase domestic
fossil fuel production faster and cheaper.
The red numbers and arrows show the additional fluxes caused by human activities averaged
over 2000 - 2009, which include emissions due to the burning of
fossil fuels, cement
production and land use change (in total about 9 PgC / year).
Over 60 million tonnes of hydrogen are produced every year for a range of industrial purposes, including ammonia
production, hydrocracking (breaking complex hydrocarbons into lighter
fuels), and removing sulfur from
fossil fuels.
I would like to see the environmental impact statement for 400 one gigawatt wind / solar farms (average output
over a calendar year) and the lead / acid battery
production facilities necessary to back each of them up
over all anticipated combinations of overcast / calm / darkness to ensure that the 400 gigawatt baseload capacity was available with a reliability equal to or superior to that of the
fossil fuel plants that they replaced.
Over 90 per cent of global emissions come from burning
fossil fuels and cement
production.
As can be seen by the figure, solar is being subsidized by
over 1200 times more than coal and oil and natural gas electricity
production, and wind is being subsidized
over 80 times more than the more conventional
fossil fuels on a unit of
production basis.
Second, the rapid and large - scale exploitation of
fossil fuels [4]-- a vast stock of nonrenewable resources accumulated by Nature
over hundreds of millions of years that are being drawn down in just a few centuries — and the invention of the Haber — Bosch process to use natural gas to produce nitrogen fertilizer [5,6] enabled increasingly higher levels of food and energy
production.
The oil sands, even in the worst case (assuming constant
production rates of coal, gas and conventional oil, with accelerated bitumen
production), will only contribute a small proportion, about 3 %, to
fossil -
fuel emissions
over this century.
Fossil fuels not only provide the energy required for our manufacturing processes that alternatives will be hard - pressed (if even possible) to replace (including those needed to create the alternatives) but have been used to underpin much of the world's food production (while not particularly wise over the long - term, the world's population depends upon fossil fuel - based herbicides, pesticides, and fertilizers to remain
Fossil fuels not only provide the energy required for our manufacturing processes that alternatives will be hard - pressed (if even possible) to replace (including those needed to create the alternatives) but have been used to underpin much of the world's food
production (while not particularly wise
over the long - term, the world's population depends upon
fossil fuel - based herbicides, pesticides, and fertilizers to remain
fossil fuel - based herbicides, pesticides, and fertilizers to remain fed).