Sentences with phrase «over giroud»

Also, in a widely expected move, manager Arsene Wenger has chosen to start Theo Walcott as the central striker over Giroud.

I know it's hard to be man enough and give credit where it's due but you are clutching at straws if you think Welbeck is worth keeping over Giroud...

Yh right.Dont talk like that its irritating like the are no strikers out there better than him.It is a saying that the truth will set you free.Giroud is on the level of average but arsenal have made him look very good only a few will see it.Those who actually watch his every move even without the ball and on it.If i mention the strikers i will take over Giroud some of you here will call me stupid.Listen if Wenger cant sign a striker he should just get Charlie Austin he can finish off chances and he is a good striker, He can be world class if he works hard.Only a matter of time before he proves to the world what they have been but its like just his name does not excite fans.He is even light ahead of Giroud and a neutral would be saying the same thing if he was watching them on tv always.

It is aided by his pace and apparent legs he has over Giroud considering he's 4 years younger than him.

but for the remaining fixtures I want Welbeck over Giroud... Welbeck and Iwobi seem to bring out a more creative attack and play which is what we need right now!

And yes I would easily choose Charlie Austin or beneteke over giroud any day

I don't know why Mkhitaryan won when he was offside, but maybe Carrol was chosen over Giroud because people thought it required less luck and more skill.

Welbeck is the only positive really as he is a slight improvement over Giroud, but it also means no chance of a better striker in January like Cavani, Martinez or Huntelaar.

Mktharyan is a good start but we need to replace Alexis quality as Lacazette is good but not a HUGE improvement over Giroud yet.

Would take Vardy over Giroud any day, even recognizing he might not do the business for us at Arsenal.

At front, Theo should be the starter over Giroud and lets hope Alexis get his mojo back.

I'd take Benzema over Giroud all day long.

I would take Lacazette over Giroud, because he would suit Wenger's style of play better, not to mention the amount of goals he gets.

Basically, he doesn't offer enough of an upgrade over Giroud to justify the 50m Everton has supposedly slapped on him.

If Walcott isn't picked though (over Giroud), it may be a massive signal as to where his future lies, because he would be massively deflated having just scored the only hat - trick of Arsenal's season in his 3rd or whatever start.

Higuain would get us an extra 7 or 8 goals over Giroud every 100 games and Benzema a little less (look at career goal / game ratios)-- unless you are going to tell me they can score more at Arsenal than they could at Real Madrid / Napoli.

I thought Lacazette was bought & preferred over Giroud was bcoz he is more mobile, more robust & much faster.

Con: Lacazette was supposedly bought & preferred over Giroud coz he's more mobile, more robust & much faster... But to be out - muscled & out run by Luiz & Cahill who are in their 30s every - time??

I for his pace over Giroud, I decided to start Welbeck to lead the line.

He can easily take over Giroud's spot In a couple of years when Giroud leaves or loses it.

Welbeck over Giroud as I expect us to be playing a lot on the counter but Giroud can also start if we take a more possession based approach.

Who knows... what is for sure is that we have to play way better than in any of games so far... they have gaps in defence and have lost two serious attacking options so I hope we are attack minded... team almost picks itself... Reluctantly would say Walcott over giroud with ozil playing behind....

Dennis Cherysev is not needed but i do nt know why people call him average when some here accept Giroud is just below world class or to some he actually is.If Cherysev was a cf i would have taken him over Giroud anyday.Karim Benzema is not coming because Real Madrid will not sell for any reason.I would love to see how Cazorla at no. 10 and Ramsey playin next to Coquelin will look like.To me i believe the playing of Ramey out wide severally has affected his form.To me when on form he is better than Cazorla in that role.Cazorla should be playing no. 10 but its because je keeps the ball well thats why people want him playing behind.Cazorla expresses himself best at no. 10 and that is the only truth.There will surely be some matches where Cazorla in box to box will not be going very well.He needs to go back to his former position.

Of his type, there isn't really anyone I'd choose over Giroud anyway.

More over that Giroud is becoming a super-sub now.

In other side, I thought Arsene should pulled off Theo over Giroud, because Theo's pace won't work against well sitting Chelsea and we were going to have big numbers of corner kick specially at second half.

Dzeko over Giroud??

I think Chicharito is a good finisher and a much better finisher then Giroud I also like the speed advantage he brings over Giroud.

I would even prefer Welbeck over Giroud as a central striker.

In that regard, on skills, I would take Welbeck over Giroud and Walcott any day (Perez is gone no need to talk about him).

Are you by any stretch of imagination saying Martial is an upgrade over Giroud.

Other than that there are question marks over Giroud, Welbz, Theo, Ramsey due to their ability and forn, along with Ozil and Sanchez due to their contracts / attitudes.

I'm convinced the Auba deal is stalling over Giroud going there.If this is the case just pay them the money and leave Giroud scrambling around for game time.Thats his World Cup over and just get rid of him in the summer to a club that his ability deserves eg.Hartlepool Carlisle etc and see how his wife likes the shopping up there.

That is only a 20 - 30 % increase of over Giroud's totals.

I don't think Lukaku is world class, but I would take him in a heart beat over Giroud.

Unlike Wenger they may bent by the will of the fan and go getting the best available striker in the market like Benteke (32.5 M), Mandzukic (18M), Martinez (25M) and let the fan hail them as huge upgrade over Giroud — will it improve our chance of winning the EPL?

Plus, can we honestly say he'd be a clear - cut improvement over Giroud & Theo?

for 3 years we've needed a striker and a stong CDM all the pundits say is arsenal need a top striker and a cdm to anchor the team and bring strenth to our team which is true and 3 years later and the same problems if we brought in a player like calvarho and a good striker and right now i know we'd all take Balotelli or remy over giroud we'd be a great team and it's been that way for such a long time now i just don't see why we add these two keey pieces....

That said, I prefer Welbeck slightly over Giroud.

GK down so now the most important position to strengthen is ST.. So many massively underestimate Giroud and Walcott — Strikers that may be available are Martinez, Mandzukic, Higauin can be slightly better than Giroud — but if you take in 1 year to adapt to EPL — they are no improvement over Giroud for next season To improve we need a real world class one and in this market it is clear that he does not come cheap — I won't be surprise if the asking price is somewhere at 50M pound mark.

Alexis is easily one of our best players, it must annoy him to see the manager take him off over Giroud, even though he has something like six in seven now.

I say that is # 40 mil of our transfer budget on someone that is maybe a slight upgrade over Giroud.

Arsene Wenger can must get Ben Yedder as long as he's clinical and can beat his man.I'd take him over Giroud any day and I think if Giroud is put in that Toulouse squad he won't score more goals than Ben Yedder and denying this fact would mean you choose to be blinded.We had better get him quickly.I've said it here time and time again the reason why Arsenal are not winning things with Giroud is because he's not clinical.If you guys were to ever watch his misses in every season by season since he came here you would be shocked at the kind of striker we have.But as usual he's always forgiven and people continually rate him basing it on statistics and forget he's playing for Arsenal with the likes of.......

But both Lukaku and Morata are regarded than Giroud and are both better than Giroud like it or not.Morata has not really had a team where he's been the main man and I don't think he's played the number of games Giroud has.As for Lukaku not outscoring Giroud in the big games it's not a problem.Even if it was vice versa it means nothing.I'd take Lukaku over Giroud all day long.

There is a reason why benzema started over giroud for france, and I will gladly start him over giroud for arsenal if he's available for a reasonable price (highly doubt he's for sale though)

Not sure I don't think he is an improvement over Giroud He has had only 1 good season

Walcott for me over Giroud anyday.

I'm happy for Giroud to stay But Lacazette must start over Giroud in Premier League matches.

Carroll over Giroud??? On paper, we are definitely the better team.

What Henri + Wright have over Giroud is that they played in Premiership winning sides.