One group consisted of conflicted and guilt - ridden homosexual men who saw a sex - change as a way to resolve their conflicts
over homosexuality by allowing them to behave sexually as females with men.
Not exact matches
Gay rights groups have expressed outrage
over comments made
by a senior Vatican official linking
homosexuality to child abuse.
Chalke has strayed from safe evangelical territory
over the years, upsetting conservatives
by publicising his views on
homosexuality, biblical interpretation, and the atonement.
Before dismissing the above fantasy too quickly, let the reader think about why it is that our society seems so little concerned
over female
homosexuality, has regarded it so lightly, and has no idea of the amount of female sexual activity engaged in
by women who are not admitted homosexuals.
That Was the Church That Was (I think I can reveal without causing any grave difficulties to anyone) is dominated
by factional differences between evangelical conservatives and liberal Catholics,
by office politics,
by money troubles, and
by struggles
over homosexuality and
over the ordination of women.
The first is that Christian denominations that have taken this form of liberalism most to heart are also those that seem to be experiencing a serious crisis of confidence, as evidenced
by declining membership, intra-denominational splits
over issues like
homosexuality, and ¯ in some cases ¯ increasing discomfort with core Christian beliefs about Jesus Christ and the Trinity.
In addition to clashes
over liberation theology, Vatican authorities have continued to uphold official teaching on sexual ethics in general (as in a 1986 statement on
homosexuality by Cardinal Ratzinger) and have withstood calls even for an open discussion of women's ordination or of ending celibacy as a requirement for the priesthood.
In describing and accounting for the lives of the Religious Right, which we define simply as religious conservatives with a considerable involvement in political activity, the book and the series tell the story primarily
by focusing on leading episodes in the movement's history, including, but not limited to, the groundwork laid
by Billy Graham in his relationships with presidents and other prominent political leaders; the resistance of evangelical and other Protestants to the candidacy of the Roman Catholic John F. Kennedy; the rise of what has been called the New Right out of the ashes of Barry Goldwater's defeat in 1964; a battle
over sex education in Anaheim, California, in the mid-1960's; a prolonged cultural war
over textbooks in West Virginia in the early 1970's — and that is a battle that has been fought less violently in community after community all
over the country; the thrill conservative Christians felt
over the election of a «born - again» Christian to the Presidency in 1976 and the subsequent disappointment they experienced when they found out that Jimmy Carter was, of all things, a Democrat; the rise of the Moral Majority and its infatuation with Ronald Reagan; the difficulty the Religious Right has had in dealing with abortion,
homosexuality and AIDS; Pat Robertson's bid for the presidency and his subsequent launching of the Christian Coalition; efforts
by Dr. James Dobson and Gary Bauer to win a «civil war of values»
by changing the culture at a deeper level than is represented
by winning elections; and, finally,
by addressing crucial questions about the appropriate relationship between religion and politics or, as we usually put it, between church and state.
Homosexuality is still illegal in
over 70 countries worldwide and punishable
by death in eight.
Indeed,
over the past 2 decades, researchers have turned up considerable evidence that
homosexuality isn't a lifestyle choice, but is rooted in a person's biology and at least in part determined
by genetics.
The Imitation Game — the story of Alan Turing, the man who beat the Germans» Enigma Machine during WWII (essentially
by designing and building a computer) and then had to submit to chemical castration after being convicted of
homosexuality (one of
over 49,000) when it was still a crime and, within a few years, committed suicide.
begs the question of whether we're in for art that tells the story of
homosexuality in Britain
over the 150 years leading up to the legal landmark, or art
by artists who just happen to be gay.
Because who hasn't read the case where the Minnesota Supreme Court decided that even «protesting
homosexuality by riding [a] horse through a crowd gathered to celebrate National Coming Out Day, shouting anti-homosexual statements, swinging a rope, and knocking
over signs advertising the event» is constitutionally protected?