Not exact matches
If the market drops 50 percent, for example, or well
over that
threshold, the investor's principal is at significant
risk.
Finally, Glass Lewis identified shortcomings with the «straw man» proposal including arbitrary
thresholds that could result in perverse incentives for intermediaries as well as
risks relating to disputes
over subjective eligibility requirements, among other concerns.
The results of at least two recent studies, however, suggest that reductions in full - contact practices can be accompished safely without putting players at additional
risk, while researchers continue looking for the head trauma «holy grail»: a
threshold - whether it is number of hits per week,
over the course of the season, of a certain force, or to a certain part of the helmet (e.g. facemask, top of the head) above which players are at an unacceptably high
risk of permanent brain injury.
So I suppose, considering what you and someone above said about the meter not catching stuff, my question would be (well two questions) why they follow up with someone who DOES have gestational diabetes by assigning a meter, and then whether, if the person was able to avoid huge insulin peaks by eating well and such that the meter showed them not going
over their established (by the doctor that is)
threshold, would that mean that they were effectively mitigating the
risks?
The International Atomic Energy Agency says exposure
over that
threshold measurably raises the
risk of later cancers.
When identifying another student pushes a district
over a
risk ratio
threshold, the district faces a clear incentive to under identify — that is, to withhold services from — children who already face a broad array of systemic disadvantages.
«When you set a specific goal, or say if we go
over some
threshold the
risk will increase dramatically, you are then linking action to a specific scientific claim that can be disputed.
IMO it's not particularly sensible to frame the entire issue in terms of the small chance of «climate catastrophe» because then we
risk having the rug abruptly pulled out from under our policies when someone proves that the catastrophe is less likely than was previously thought: — RRB - Also, arguing
over the precise
threshold probability for particular outcomes
risks turning into angels - on - pins stuff.
By setting a temperature goal any higher than 1.5 °C or a long term goal any later than 2050, we
risk shooting
over to the
threshold of very dangerous.
heightened
risk because of her employment or that the
threshold she tripped
over was defective or sufficiently unusual. . .
Posted in application process, approval, Biggest Loser, BMI, build, decline, Fat March, height and weight, insurance, life insurance, life insurance approval, obesity,
over 50 life insurance Tagged approval
threshold BMI 50, approval
threshold dropped, Biggest Loser, BMI, collateral health issues, insurance, life insurance, morbid obesity, mortality, mortality experience linked to morbid obesity, new charts impact underwriting, no notice to agents, obesity, obesity life insurance, offsetting credits,
over 50 life insurance, ovr 50 ife insurance, perceived mortality
risk, Prudential new guidelines