Sentences with phrase «over opinion content»

Not exact matches

Cumberland Advisors has no control over such websites, does not recommend or endorse any opinions, ideas, products, information, or content of such sites, and makes no warranties as to the accuracy, completeness, reliability or suitability of their content.

It means that they can potentially control the flow of digital information, favoring content that aligns with their corporate interests and steering people's opinions over time by regulating how fast content of one type or another gets delivered.

Furthermore, Timmins Gold and its management have no control over our editorial content and any opinions expressed are those of our own.

A recent paper discovered over $ 42 million in contributions since 9/11 to anti-Muslim opinion leaders who have mass - mailed DVDs and other hate - based content upon the US citizenry.

Non-GMO Project exercises no control over the information, opinions, accuracy, copyright, trademark, compliance, or legality of the material contained on those sites and does not sponsor, endorse, or evaluate the content, proceeds, materials, opinions, products or services contained on such sites.

News & Notes is a weekly Saturday post featuring book - and publishing - related news, links to interesting articles and opinion pieces, and other cool stuff Book News Christmas Week Sales Jump 7 % Over 2016 (Publishers Weekly) S&S was concerned about the content and quality of Milo Yiannopoulis's autobiography well before the publishing... Read more»

We have no control over the content of these sites, and we in no way endorse any of the information or opinions they may contain.

However Yonderbound had no control over its content; I have spent hours upon hours testing the site in order to give you my full and honest opinions **

Ken, a few remarks: — E&E didn't threat Gavin with lawsuits over their libel: http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/02/22/realclimates-over-the-top-response/ — The article of Oliver Manuel was peer reviewed, the reviewers didn't agree with the content, therefore the article was published as an «opinion», not a peer - reviewed article.

Those Reports comprise a condensation of opinion from over 3,500 experts, plus several hundred editors and reviewers, and the content of over 6,000 peer - reviewed papers.

Alan Sugarman: Okay so West v. Mead basically gave a monopoly to West over the content and the citation to the content of judicial opinions.

TIME Tech correspondent Matt Peckham, in an opinion piece on that site, discusses another challenge to the resale of digital content: the fact that it is «perma - new» and doesn't deteriorate over time in the manner of most used goods offered for resale.

«It's very difficult to grow up without developing some political opinion that has been shaped by the content you see from your friends and family over a social network platform.»

Prof. Conduct 123 (2001)(subject to the operational structure and content described in the opinion, a lawyer may affiliate with an online legal services website); Nebraska Op. 07 - 05 (lawyer may participate in internet lawyer directory which identifies itself as a directory, disclaims being a referral service and only lists basic information about lawyers without recommending specific lawyers and charges a reasonable, flat annual advertising fee); New Jersey Committee on Attorney Advertising Op. 36 (2006)(lawyer may pay flat fee to internet marketing company for exclusive website listing for particular county in specific practice area if listing includes prominent, unmistakable disclaimer stating the listings are paid advertisements and not endorsements or authorized referrals); North Carolina Op. 2004 - 1 (lawyer may participate in for - profit online service that is a hybrid referral service - legal directory, provided there is no fee - sharing with the service and communications are truthful); Oregon Op. 2007 - 180 (2007)(lawyer may pay nationwide internet referral service for listing if listing is not false or misleading and does not imply that the lawyer can represent clients outside jurisdictions of the lawyer's license, fee is not based on number of referrals, retained clients or revenue generated by listing and the service does not exercise discretion in matching clients with lawyers); Rhode Island 2005 - 01 (permitting website that enables lawyers to post information about their services and respond to anonymous requests for legal services in exchange for flat annual membership fee if website exercises no discretion over which requests lawyers may access); South Carolina 01 - 03 (lawyer may pay internet advertising service fee determined by the number of «hits» that the service produces for the lawyer provided that the service does not steer business to any particular lawyer and the payments are not based on whether user ultimately becomes a client); Texas Op. 573 (2006)(lawyer may participate in for - profit internet service that matches potential clients and lawyers if selection process is fully automated and performed by computers without the exercise of human discretion); Virginia Advertising Op.

Many users of Facebook voiced opinions against the changes to the Facebook Terms of Use, leading to an Internet - wide debate over the ownership of content.

Digital radio «enables global distribution and dissemination of information and content and democratizes access to opinions, news and entertainment,» he said, noting that radio content consumption carries over into the connected home, connected cars, mobile and wearable domains, and the immersive experience.