If you guys can't even agree
over religion on a discussion board, how can one possibly think that there is one solution to make everyone happy in this ceremony.
They cry «persecution» when they can't fork
over their religion on others, for example around the time of the winter solstice.
Not exact matches
This comes just nine months after the Labor Department sued Google for not handing
over 19 years of pay data
on 21,000 Google employees for a routine audit into the company's pay methods, as part of that department's attempt to show whether Google's hiring discriminates
on the basis of race,
religion, gender, or other factors.
Intermittent fasting
over a certain period of time is a feature of great
religions all
over the world and it is well known that nutritional habits, sleeping patterns and meal frequency have profound effects
on maintaining human health.
Yes, it is unconsti.tutional for a state to overrule federal law
on the preference for one
religion over another
on government owned land..
There's well
over a century of research
on how
religions originate, function in society and the individual psychology involved.
Atheists: I know many there are many people that practice
religion just by fanaticism, I've seen many people in my opinion stupid (excuse the word) praying to saints hopping to solve their problems by repeating pre-made sentences
over and
over, but there are others different, I don't think
Religion and Science need to be opposites, I believe in God, I'm Catholic and I have many reasons to believe in him, I don't think however that we should pray instead of looking for the cause and applying a solution, Atheists think they are smart because they focus
on Science and technology instead of putting their faith in a God, I don't think God will solve our problems, i think he gave us the means to solve them by ourselves that's were God is, also I think that God created everything but not as a Magical thing but stablishing certain rules like Physics and Quimics etc. he's not an idiot and he knew how to make it so everything was
on balance, he's the Scientist of Scientist the Mathematic of Mathematics, the Physician of Physicians, from the tiny little fact that a mosquito, an insect species needs to feed from blood from a completely different species, who created the mosquitos that way?
This country is based
on religious FREEDOM and that means no one has the right to put one
religion over another.
Get
over your militant crusade to enforce your own
religion (the belief that there is no God is a belief, and therefore the foundation of the atheist
religion)
on everyone and let them choose to believe as they wish.
I know you aren't a fool, so I am just trying to explain my take
on all this based
on my haphazard legal education and insistence upon the rule of law
over that of
religion.
I wonder what would happen
over there if the world's people were to finally see the truth and realize that
religion is being used to delude them into thinking world wars are the way of life — something that has to happen in order for... their glorious ascension into heaven or hell --(depending
on who's side — re:
religion — god — whatever — you are
on).
Although not big
on religion myself — remember God made Eve from Adam's rib — his side — to walk beside him, not to be
over or under him!
Where debate
on the subject of
religion versus secularism is concerned, it's always easy to find voices shrieking
over the banishment of
religion and Christianity from American life, and claims the nation is morally bankrupt because of the success progressives have had with marginalizing or outlawing religious practices.
You don't have a leg to stand
on and your kind are desperately seeking ways of stopping the exodus from
religion all
over the world.
All
religions on this planet simply need to get
over themselves and move
on.
That form of «
religion» is an entertainment industry in which standard form for preachers, teachers, and speakers IS to package and promote themselves in a constant competition for top celebrity status,
on such venues as TBN, just as aspiring popular music groups and singers are
over on MTV.
Christians are constantly trying to fork their
religion over on everyone, including through enacting legislation where they have voter majorities.
«Well aware that the opinions and belief of men depend not
on their own will, but follow involuntarily the evidence proposed to their minds; that Almighty God hath created the mind free, and manifested his supreme will that free it shall remain by making it altogether insusceptible of restraint; that all attempts to influence it by temporal punishments, or burthens, or by civil incapacitations, tend only to beget habits of hypocrisy and meanness, and are a departure from the plan of the holy author of our
religion, who being lord both of body and mind, yet chose not to propagate it by coercions
on either, as was in his Almighty power to do, but to extend it by its influence
on reason alone; that the impious presumption of legislators and rulers, civil as well as ecclesiastical, who, being themselves but fallible and uninspired men, have assumed dominion
over the faith of others, setting up their own opinions and modes of thinking as the only true and infallible, and as such endeavoring to impose them
on others, hath established and maintained false
religions over the greatest part of the world and through all time.»
In fact, the oppression of some Christian governments against rival sects of Christians is the entire reason our founding fathers built our government to be secular, with no authority
on religious matters, with no voice
over the
religion of its citizens, and guaranteed to all the freedom to worship, or not, as their conscious dictates.
Well I don't believe in everything you believe but I would vote for you
over Romney if you were the best fit for president because I don't base a candidate
on his
religion.
Proof, something that not one
religion has you take your
religion on faith, and that doesn't fly in this world, try telling a bank to give you a loan of faith, try convicting someone of a crime based
on faith, try claiming ownership
over something
on faith.
The major
religions we see in the world today have evolved
over hundreds or thousands of years, but they most follow the pattern I described, so for the most part they all involve some form of worship, the concepts of rewards, punishments, and obedience, and so
on.
There is only ONE MESSAGE
on earth now that can definitely end the war and all kind of bloody feuds and conflicts within and / or between all
Religions and Sects; and here it is for all Peace Loving and Truth Seeking intelligent Humans all
over the world now:
On the political side of the strange entanglement of
religion and politics, there are also stereotypes that have been reinforced
over the years.
I personally think
religion should not be a factor.No one should ask the candidates what their religious views are and they should never mention them.Their religious preferences have absolutely no effect
on what type of leader they will be.Unless they are some kind of a religious fanatic.I think it's time for an atheist.There was not a Christian president for
over the first 50 years of our nations existence.And, I do not think there has been one since.If you look it up you will find not one of our founding fathers were Christian.Not even Jefferson.I know he wrote the Jefferson bible, but, that's just because he, like the other founding fathers, did not believe Jesus to be of divine decent.So, he kept his philosophy while removing all the mystical and dogmatic concepts.
You know — every time I see
religion debated
on a public forum, the whole thing is an exercise in mental futility as both the atheists and even some of the Christians make the same type of mistakes
over and
over again and just yell back and forth at each other.
The shirt features an all
over monochrome print and has a pocket
on the left chest with
religion text branding.
The lilac savage «Dream Oil Vest» comes in an all
over oil wash and features «
RELIGION» branding
on the chest.
Over at First Things a transcript has appeared of the 2017 Erasmus Lecture given at the end of last year by Bishop Robert Barron
on the subject of «reaching the nones», that is those who self - declare as being of «no
religion».
In fact,
over two thousand years of biblical interpretation, the Christian
religion has proved to be ridiculously flexible, able to tolerate significant theological and practical differences without, you know, us having to say «farewell» to people who land
on a different interpretation.»
then go to another
religion and see how many more people were fooled by some other
religion, and then go and see how another
religion fooled the masses
over time, and
on it goes.
Honestly, hand
on my heart, you are like fresh air blowing
over the muck of
religion and religious bigotry.
The poor that oppressed the poor is like a man trying too gather grain in a driveing rain storm, islam
religion when I see these same country poor opperressing the poor by breaking up store shops turning
over cars and setting cars
on fire of the poor really sad
But when the subject of civil
religion became a minor academic industry, I became increasingly concerned, as conferences, panels and symposia
on the subject proliferated, that the whole issue was bogging down into arguments
over definition and that substance was being overlooked.
Possession of the name of either man or god conferred
on the possessor control
over him — such was and still is the well - nigh universal belief of primitive
religion.
Over 70 % of North Koreans are unaffiliated, according to a 2012 study
on world
religions by the Pew Form
on Religion and Public Life.
He would bring in the lawyers
on opposite sides of the argument
over religious establishment and the question of driving
religion from the public square.
Upon reflection, I can not claim that any major changes
on the issues of
religion, God or Christ have occurred for me
over the past ten years.
I look forward to the demise of
religion as people all
over the World become more educated, and more free to make up their own decisions
on what path they should choose in life.
for all the ONE god believers, there are
over 2300
religions on earth.
I've heard these very things said by those who are
on the other end of the people who use
religion and politics to enrich themselves, give them power and authority
over their fellow human beings and draw attention to themselves rather than to God.
Much of the debate
over Stark's work has focused
on his application of «rational choice theory» to
religion.
Over the years, the Supreme Court has had trouble deciding between two competing theories
on how the courts should interpret the
religion clause of the First Amendment.
On a side note, it's odd to see people arguing
over religion considering all of the other problems in America.
Considering such texts (and much else)
over the past months, I have found myself wondering: has not the Christian
religion put far too much emphasis
on sin, and far too little
on finitude, mortality, creaturehood?
Tell us all the objective Reality of what good has been provided by
religion for thousands of years that make people hold
on to it in spite of already knowing these wonderous truths you keep reminding us about
over and
over about like a broken record.
In seeking to root out man's claim to a special status in the universe, deep ecologists are pagan pantheists who reject biblical
religion, especially the injunction of Genesis 1:28 to «Fill the earth and subdue it; have dominion
over the fish of the seas, the birds of the sky, and all the living beings that move
on this earth.»
Quit putting us in wars
over religion... we have enough problems
on this planet to deal with as a species... real problems that will take all of us, working TOGETHER, to solve.
The lawsuits I saw
on the site you linked me to all seemed to relate to situations where government agencies were explicitly or implicitly holding up one particular
religion over another.
As we read this history, the furor
over stem cells was fueled by numerous factors: the near - universal human desire for magic; patients» desperation in the face of illness and their hope for cures; the belief that biology can now do anything; the reluctance of scientists to accept any limits (particularly moral limits)
on their research; the impact of big money from biotech stocks, patents, and federal funding; the willingness of America's elite class to use every means possible to discredit
religion in general; and the need to protect the unlimited abortion license by accepting no protections of unborn human life.