Late yesterday, I received an email from a school nutrition director who chastised me for being divisive and unfair in recent posts regarding the battle
over school food nutrition standards.
Not exact matches
Yesterday First Lady Michelle Obama, accompanied by Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack, released the final federal
nutrition standards for
school meals, representing the first major overhaul of
school food requirements in
over 15 years.
Then Jenna Pepper, a vegetable and
nutrition enthusiast who blogs
over at
Food With Kid Appeal, brought up the point in her excellent article that if we continue to feed them junk food and don't collectively teach our kids, at home and at school, about the joys and benefits of eating real food, children will pick the crap over the good stuff when given the cho
Food With Kid Appeal, brought up the point in her excellent article that if we continue to feed them junk
food and don't collectively teach our kids, at home and at school, about the joys and benefits of eating real food, children will pick the crap over the good stuff when given the cho
food and don't collectively teach our kids, at home and at
school, about the joys and benefits of eating real
food, children will pick the crap over the good stuff when given the cho
food, children will pick the crap
over the good stuff when given the choice.
When advocates who share a common interest in fighting child obesity are at each other's throats
over whether chocolate milk is a tasty way for kids to get important
nutrition, or the Drink of Satan, the whole
school food reform movement suffers, and that hurts kids.
Throughout OSPI there is the concept that, although our
School Child
Nutrition Programs are not for profit but to feed students, we should be cutting costs as a priority
over what is sometimes recognized as good
nutrition — a subject where many entrenched and trendy ideas prevail and are promoted by giant
food manufacturers.
The
food safety bill was passed by the Senate, the long - awaited child
nutrition /
school food legislation is ready to be signed into law, and we had a lot of really intense debate
over school food reform.
As the political wrangling
over weakening
school nutrition standards continues in Congress, here's some nice
school food news to share: Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack announced yesterday that the USDA will be providing
school districts with
over... [Continue reading]
Now, though, the Texas Department of Agriculture inexplicably wants to take a huge step backwards in child
nutrition by proposing: a return of deep fat fryers to our
schools; a six-fold increase in the number of allowed junk
food fundraising days; and the abolition of the «time and place» competitive
food restrictions that have served our children well for
over a decade.
I'm confused by the reference to the «
Food and Drug Administration» in the second entry (it's the Department of Agriculture that oversees child nutrition), but the intent of these lawmakers is clear: destroy all of the tremendous progress we've made over the last six years in improving our children's school food environment, and apparently also the food served in federally funded daycare cent
Food and Drug Administration» in the second entry (it's the Department of Agriculture that oversees child
nutrition), but the intent of these lawmakers is clear: destroy all of the tremendous progress we've made
over the last six years in improving our children's
school food environment, and apparently also the food served in federally funded daycare cent
food environment, and apparently also the
food served in federally funded daycare cent
food served in federally funded daycare centers.
In a piece written two days after the presidential election («The Fate of Hungry Kids in a Trump Administration,» cross-posted in Civil Eats), I expressed my own grave concerns
over the fate of
school food reform and other child
nutrition programs under a Trump White House and a Republican - controlled Congress.
Those are, I think, serious issues that groups like the Rudd Center should be discussing with representives of
school food service professionals, who, as we speak, are swarming
over Capitol Hill trying to convince their lawmakers that this particular provision of the child
nutrition re-authorization should be put on hold and pilot tested.
One of her points: from the kinds of junk -
food products exhibited, you would never know that the SNA was at war with the White House
over USDA's
nutrition standards for
school meals (see my previous posts).
But the comment came as DeVos, a staunch opponent of public
schools, is taking
over the nation's free lunch program that provides
nutrition to low - income students and is under attack from Republicans, raising questions about whether the administration of President Donald Trump will protect
food aid programs for children, NPR reported.
Over the years, Congress has mandated federal
nutrition standards, funded fresh fruit and vegetable programs and debated, but never acted on, banning various «junk
foods» from
schools.
The changes for snack
foods follow the updated
nutrition standards for
school lunches that have been in place
over two years and have been implemented by approximately 90 percent of districts in South Carolina.
I'm not even sure that
school food has kept up with the latest in
nutrition research that has come out
over the past 20 - 30 years.
Food /
nutrition is merely another of the endless controversies
over how public
schooling should be conducted.
While I have not attacked my
school over it's
food, I have been angry on the inside for how little is being done, even in light of all the
nutrition knowledge that is out there.
We spoke for
over an hour about
school food (lunch and breakfast) and issues like nutritional content,
food and
nutrition education, and the issue of universal
food («free for all») versus the current three - tier system in
school meals.
Over 1,900 have volunteered to offer their unique talents and knowledge of
food and
nutrition to «Chefs Move to
Schools,» an initiative that pairs chefs with interested schools in their commu
Schools,» an initiative that pairs chefs with interested
schools in their commu
schools in their communities.
Over the past thirteen years, MAP has provided jobs and training to over 650 low - income youth and food nutrition based training to over 12,000 residents, school children and policymak
Over the past thirteen years, MAP has provided jobs and training to
over 650 low - income youth and food nutrition based training to over 12,000 residents, school children and policymak
over 650 low - income youth and
food nutrition based training to
over 12,000 residents, school children and policymak
over 12,000 residents,
school children and policymakers.
As I was going through
nutrition school and with the rise of vegan documentaries like Forks
Over Knives and
Food Matters, I felt tremendous pressure to ditch eggs and dairy and eat strictly plant - based.
The SAC met four times
over the course of the 2016 - 2017
school year and selected seven key topics that the SAC feels can be changed or improved in the DC education system.The proposals submitted by the SAC focused on graduation requirements, security, access to humanities and civic engagement courses, hall sweeps,
food and
nutrition, grading systems, and student socialization.
This resource shows
over 100 recipes across the
school day that meet the
school food standards whilst also meeting the required
nutrition criteria of the GBSF.