Not exact matches
If she could take one thing back, Dr. Tisch said, it would be having rolled out the standards and the
teacher evaluation system at the same time, «
because I think the debate
over how to evaluate a
teacher contaminated the more important work.»
It is uncertain whether other school districts can replicate these effects,
because they depend on factors that many have little control
over (including the local supply of high - performing
teachers), as well as those they do control (for instance, the introduction of meaningful
teacher evaluation).
The findings are important
because of what they may contribute to the debate
over changing how
teacher evaluation is conducted, which has emerged as a hot - button political issue favored by the so - called education reform movement.
Over the summer, three states saw their waivers reclassified as «high risk»
because they didn't implement new
teacher evaluation systems on time.
The recent groundbreaking agreement
over evaluations for educators in the Los Angeles school district is a major victory for the
teachers union
because it limits the use of a controversial — but increasingly widespread — measurement of
teacher effectiveness.
No new results have been issued in
over a year
because state officials have been working to change the system to align it more closely to the state's comparatively new
evaluation process for individual
teachers.
Over the last four years in Pittsburgh, about 150
teachers have resigned or been dismissed
because of the new
evaluations, the most in the history of the district and about 7 percent of the teaching force total.
The value - added model is thought to bring objectivity to
teacher evaluations,
because it compares students to themselves
over time and largely controls for influences outside
teachers» control, such as poverty and parental involvement.
She also testified that the weight of the research shows using value - added methods for evaluating
teachers is invalid due to the instability of results
over time, and
because they rely solely on student performance on tests that were not designed for
teacher evaluation.