When you consider the backlash
over the abortion of the Oct 9th show, it's clear why they did this before the show.
Not exact matches
In 2008, just
over 3,000 legal
abortions were performed in the entire country — a tiny number given that Brazil has a population
of 200 million.
An illustrative example
of this is the highly - publicized case
of Jennie Linn McCormack, an Idaho mother
of three who was arrested in 2011 for causing her own
abortion with pills she bought
over the Internet.
UCP MLAs sat stonefaced and silent Thursday, looking at phones and tablets as opponents accused them
of misogyny and political cowardice
over the government's proposed
abortion clinic buffer zone bill.
The subject
of abortion has, perhaps unsurprisingly, been dealt with by the magazine
over the years.
Thus, debates between, for example, Roman Catholic natural law theorists and secular feminist legal theorists
over abortion are, for Posner, a waste
of time, for neither theoretical approach possesses the tools to persuade anyone
of contrary views.
And such groups provided Catholic support for the president in 2009, when he faced conservative Catholic criticism
over his commencement address at the University
of Notre Dame, and in 2010, when the bishops opposed Obama's health care law, alleging that it left the door open to taxpayer - funded
abortion.
Groups such as Catholics United and Faith in Public Life got off the ground during and just after the 2004 election when a Catholic Democratic presidential nominee - Sen. John Kerry - was hard - pressed to find Catholic support in the face
of condemnations from some Catholic bishops
over his support for
abortion rights.
For single women, pick a fight
over contraception with the Catholic Church and run a national convention in which the centrality
of abortion rights startled even seasoned observers.
So does that mean since a bunch
of rogue nuns with feminist ideals taught
over the last 50 years should force the Church to change its current teaching on euthanasia, gay marriage, and
abortion?
With more than a hint
of exasperation, Scalia concludes: «One will search in vain the document we are supposed to be construing for text that provides the basis for the argument
over these distinctions; and will find in our society's tradition regarding
abortion no hint that the distinctions are constitutionally relevant, much less any indication how a constitutional argument about them ought to be resolved.
(If that sounds familiar, it's because the same argument was made twenty - five years ago in the early stages
of the battle
over legalized
abortion.)
The proposals for health care in Congress this year, for example, will soon escalate the clash between religious hospitals and state agencies
over mandatory performance
of abortion: Any single - payer system will prove, as it must, irresistible to social engineers in government, and each twist
of the ratchet necessarily moves Catholic hospitals further from the Church and closer to the state.
The main problems with the religious right, Harris says, include disregard for poverty and international justice (particularly for women), obsession
over the issues
of abortion and gay marriage, and a mindset that generally embraces greed - centered capitalism.
None
of it seemed to matter to those in the trenches, because they already knew what was most important: The legal right to
abortion had been guaranteed to them,
over and
over again.
The Church, however, has consistently taught
over the centuries that the direct and intentional taking
of innocent human life, as in
abortion, is a grave and intrinsic evil.
What if I were to tell that since 1973 in a span
of 38 years we have exterminated
over 50 million human beings by
abortion.
The «Starving Children all
over the world can not be solved with
abortion» You eave out the facts: Fact one is that many
of those governments are in control
of the supplies that get to those countries..
They glossed
over the
abortion findings, too, which will have found
abortion rights support lower for millenials at the same age as the previous couple
of generations.
She said: «On the day when the Belfast Court
of Appeal ruled that it is up to the Stormont Assembly to decide on
abortion law in Northern Ireland, the Government at Westminster has now decided to ride roughshod
over the views
of the vast majority
of people in Northern Ireland.»
It was that consensus that unraveled in the debates
over Vietnam, civil rights,
abortion, sexual morality, women's issues, and the limits
of tolerance.
During the 2004 presidential campaign, Sen. John Kerry, a Massachusetts Democrat, was denied communion
over his support for
abortion rights, which some bishops said was in direct violation
of the church's teachings.
CNN: Catholics clergymen come out swinging against HHS regulation Catholics around the country got an earful on Sunday from the pulpit
over a new health insurance policy by the U.S. Department
of Health and Human Services that forces employers to cover contraception and
abortion as part
of preventative care regardless
of religious beliefs.
Concerns have been raised
over the number
of abortions being carried out because
of minor disabilities.
But it is
over the issues
of abortion that the good doctor stumbles most egregiously.
The bottom
of the graph indicates what has happened to conception (
abortion and birth) rates to under 16s
over this time.
Washington (CNN)- Catholics around the country got an earful on Sunday from the pulpit
over a new health insurance policy by the U.S. Department
of Health and Human Services that forces employers to cover contraception and
abortion as part
of preventative care regardless
of religious beliefs.
Now, as many
of them argue for forcing others to do what they want, like forcing doctors to refer women to abortionists or even participate in
abortions themselves, the traditional goal «has been thrown
over in favor
of a crusade to establish what might be called... «comprehensive liberalism» as the official pseudo-religion
of the state.»
The
abortion debate, as weary as we may be
of it, is just the beginning
of intensifying contestations
over technical control and manipulation
of the humanum.
I often meet
abortion rights advocates who honestly thought that the national controversy
over abortion would simply melt away within a few years
of the Roe v. Wade decision legalizing
abortion, handed down by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1973.
To date,
over sixteen studies have looked at this issue and the impact on
abortion, birth or pregnancy rates, the best
of which is probably a study by economist Philip Levine [2].
Concerns have been raised
over the number
of abortions being carried out because
of minor disabiliti... More
Our Archbishop has stated: If the provisions for contraceptives and
abortions are not removed, the Archdiocese will no longer provide health insurance benefits to any
of its employees, including
over 1800 school teachers.
«Roe v. Wade certainly did engage the pro-life movement by being so symbolic
of an issue, but I don't think the level
of opposition to
abortion has really shifted that much
over time,» Dimock said.
In population control, euthanasia,
abortion, and eugenics, the human person is treated as an object or product to be used or eliminated according to the purposes
of those who have power
over others.
Before the election, many evangelical leaders predicted that opposition to Obama
over his support for
abortion rights, his personal endorsement
of same - sex marriage and his vision
of government as a force for good would trump reservations evangelicals had about Romney's past social liberalism and his Mormon faith.
Yes, and there are 300 million citizens in the US and they can't stop from shooting each other and putting each other behind bars, and ruining the world banking system with dubious methods and instruments and wreck people's retirement savings all
over the world, not to mention the high
abortion rate, murder rate and consumption
of resources rate... It's just a disorganized disaster, as opposed to the Nazi's who had an organized disaster.
I don't think you can be a pro-life feminist and argue that women need to be condescended to and «informed
of what they're doing» as though they don't already know (cf. laws that institute mandatory waiting periods so they can «think it
over,» which puts an untenable burden on those who have to travel for
abortion procedures and do not have the money to do so).
And
over 70 %
of those
abortions were had by god fearing believers!
Will traditional marriage follow the path
of preborn life — an issue moving from judicial activism and socially elite proclamations that a generational shift was «inevitable» and «the debate is
over» to our day decades later where the youngsters are more right minded about
abortion than their parents.
A barrage
of such stuff, pouncing on any scandal that could be dug up and chipping away at the pontificate
of Pope Benedict, not to mention the usual stuff about the need to elect a pope who would change the «policy»
of the Church
over such matters as
abortion, gay marriage and women priests, had been unleashed almost immediately, once Benedict had been congratulated for bringing the papacy into the 21st century by resigning.
I have been a registered nurse for
over 37 years, and I remember caring for young women who had been on the receiving end
of an illegal
abortion before it was legal in this country.
Especially in a country in which folk wisdom and popular religion have diverse cultural sources, the appeal to these is often highly divisive, as today
over issues
of abortion and homosexuality and religious practices in the schools.
The justification for civil punishment provides such a problem, as does the controversy
over the justice
of abortion.
As everyone knows, there is a tremendous cultural struggle going on in national politics, manifested in disputes
over abortion, capital punishment, gun control, crime, welfare, affirmative action, gay rights, school prayer, and other kindred things, many
of which have a subtle racial dimension.
Some Catholics, going beyond the bishops and the Pope, maintain that the death penalty, like
abortion and euthanasia, is a violation
of the right to life and an unauthorized usurpation by human beings
of God's sole lordship
over life and death.
How has your view
of abortion changed
over the years?
Arkes remains a convinced incrementalist in
abortion politics: he recounts the battle
over partial - birth
abortion (still ongoing) as a «modest first step» away from the jurisprudence
of Roe; in a similar vein he has hopes that the Born - Alive Act (now signed into law) might help to revive reasoned public discourse about the true character
of abortion.
By claiming, for example, that Arkes has incorrectly interpreted the reasons for the Civil War and the debate
over abortion, and has neglected to provide a fuller picture
of the Founders and their beliefs, Prof. Smolin is presupposing a moral notion that is logically prior to his analysis: historical texts and events should be interpreted accurately.
But a serious analysis
of survey data
over time provides little evidence that this fall's election cycle substantially shifted public opinion in favor
of legal
abortion.