It's a model (so it ai nt the truth) but it a nice one to illustrate the point you make about emerging systems of influence that are rapidly taking
over the fossil fuel industry.
Not exact matches
Viewed in one dimension, the standoff
over construction of a 1,172 - mile, $ US 3.8 billion oil pipeline pits thousands of protesters massed on the prairie to safeguard a sole source of tribal drinking water from the
fossil fuel industry and its allies in government and finance.
Traditionally the
industry has been a heavy user of
fossil fuels, primarily oil, the price of which has fluctuated from under $ 15 a barrel 20 years ago to peaks of $ 90 to
over $ 100 now, making
fossil fuels such as bunker oil vastly more expensive.
The old way of doing business, with big centralized power companies and
industries that are totally reliant on
fossil fuels, is
over, he says.
The jist of this is that we must NOT suddenly switch off carbon / sulphur producing
industries over the planet but instead we must first dramatically reduce CO2 emissions from every conceivable source, then gradually tackle coal /
fossil fuel sources to smoothly remove the soot from the air to prevent a sudden leap in average global temps which if it is indeed 2.75 C as the UNEP predicts will permanently destroy the climates ability to regulate itself and lead to catastrophic changes on the land and sea.
So, if Inhofe lets money dictate his policies, what does it mean that the top three contributors to his campaign are dirty energy companies (Koch
industries being # 1), or that he has taken well
over $ 1 million from the
fossil fuel industry since 1999?
During the last century or so,
over half of the CO2 emissions from
fossil fuel burning,
industry, and deforestation have been absorbed by natural sinks such as the forests and oceans.
He has accepted more than $ 1.2 million in money from the
fossil -
fuel industry over the last decade while failing to disclose that conflict of interest in most of his scientific papers.
Even though the country already generates
over 99 percent of its electricity from renewable sources and ran entirely on alternative energy for 250 days in 2016, completely banning
fossil fuels across all
industries will likely prove difficult.
Re # 43, A «collosal political jump forward» would be for the US to strip all subsidies from the
fossil fuel industry, and to strip all subsidies from
fossil -
fuel intensive agricultural
industry as well (
over $ 35 billion a year), and to deliver those subsidies to solar, wind, and carbon - neutral agricultural
industries — as well as instituting a hefty carbon tax on all
fossil fuels, and agreeing to strict emissions caps, and mandating energy efficient technology in all areas.
They involve billions of dollars of subsidies of
fossil fuel industries, of airport expansion and of road building, regulations which favour dirty technologies
over clearn ones, granting planning permission for coal fire stations but refusing it for wind turbines, etc..
The transition away from
fossil fuels will take some time, but
over the last year and a half, we have already taken unprecedented action to jumpstart the clean energy
industry.
It's important to note that there's also sometimes a kind of «false inequivalence» in the fight
over climate science and policies — an implication that the lack of action on greenhouse gases is largely the result of the unfair advantage in money and influence held by
industries dealing in, or dependent on,
fossil fuels.
The banking sector has been the target of numerous campaigns
over the years with tax avoidance, excessive directors» remuneration, investments in the
fossil fuel industry and investments in nuclear weapons continuing to be key pressure points.
Over the last two decades, there has been an attempt to use shareholder action to change the behaviour of the
fossil fuel industry.
Accusations of corrupt
fossil fuel industry influence
over skeptic climate scientists are irrelevant material — worthless — in the absence of any physical evidence (full context document scans, undercover video / audio transcripts, leaked emails, money - transfer receipts) proving such skeptics were paid and orchestrated to lie about the certainty of catastrophic man - caused global warming.
DeSmogBlog has documented how
over the years, the sponsors of Heartland's semi-annual ICCC events have included special interest groups that have received millions of dollars from the
fossil fuel industry.
The biggest failing of the economic models that predict ruin is that they are unable to account for the
industries that will,
over time, grow to replace the
fossil -
fuel based
industries.
Between 2010 and 2012 alone, individuals and companies in the
fossil fuel industry spent an unprecedented $ 90.5 million to elect friendly Republicans, an increase of 66 percent
over the previous two election cycles (compared with $ 15.7 million they gave to Democrats), according to Center for Responsive Politics data.
The
fossil fuels industry is routinely — and wrongly — pilloried in the mainstream media
over its purported obfuscations surrounding climate change.
But while his fans play up his association with the environmental group, they fail to mention his much stronger ties to
fossil fuel - intensive
industries: For
over 20 years, he's been a paid spokesman for companies involved in «mining, energy, forestry, aquaculture, biotechnology, pharmaceuticals and manufacturing.»
Cramer has a long record of climate change denial (apropos of nothing,
over his career Cramer has received more than a half million bucks in funding from the
fossil fuel industry, more than twice as much as any other
industry).
Maybe someone should clue Smith in on this, if he can hear it
over the sound of
fossil fuel industry donations pouring into his coffers.
Smith's most dramatic rush to the legal defense of the
fossil fuel industry was his unprecedented move last year to issue subpoenas to two state attorneys general and several nongovernmental advocacy groups
over the states» climate change fraud investigation of Exxon.
Worry
over the environment, and a desire to challenge the
fossil fuel industry, is what is leading some people to join the cleanweb movement.
Government giveaways in the form of permanent tax breaks to the
fossil fuel industry — one of which is
over a century old — are seven times larger than those to the renewable energy sector.
We've crossed this epic milestone just weeks ahead of the Global Divestment Mobilisation, when people all
over the world will be taking action to highlight the moral urgency of cutting ties with the
fossil fuel industry and pushing their institutions to divest.
That effectively stopped the project dead in its tracks, because for the foreseeable future, biofuels will be more expensive than
fossil fuels since
industry has to do all the work that Mother Nature did for free
over the eons.
Our local councils invest
over # 14 billion in the
fossil fuel industry, but already there are nearly 50 local groups and campaigns taking action to divest local government, with more springing up every month.
«At the current rate of capital expenditure, the next decade will see
over $ 6 trillion allocated to developing the
fossil fuel industry.»
If the propaganda and articles generated by the
industry are any indication there is serious concern by
fossil fuel users
over any attempts to impose limits on mercury emissions from coal burning sources.
The global
fossil fuel industry faces a loss of $ 28 trillion in revenues
over the next two decades, if the world takes action to address climate change, cleans up pollution and moves to decarbonise the global energy system, according to European broking house Kepler Chevreux.
The New York Times writes «He has accepted more than $ 1.2 million in money from the
fossil -
fuel industry over the last decade while failing to disclose that conflict of interest in most of his scientific papers.»
The latest resolution calls on Trump and Congress to hand
over the power to regulate and permit
fossil fuel development on public lands to the states, where the
industry has its greatest power and influence
over government.
Major global insurance companies are urging G20 leaders to commit to a specific timeline for rapidly phasing out
fossil fuel subsidies — something they've repeatedly failed to do
over the years despite numerous promises to end support for the
industry.
There were so many committed friends and allies from organizations all across the board all working together in a grand coalition to step in where this administration won't, and make common sense changes to our laws to favor the interests of the people
over the greed of the
fossil fuel industry.
So, if Inhofe lets money dictate his policies, what does it mean that the top three contributors to his campaign are dirty energy companies (Koch
industries being # 1), or that he has taken well
over $ 1 million from the
fossil fuel industry since 1999?
Moreover, facing the problem squarely and honestly runs contrary to a shared value system — one that discounts the need for government regulation, favors
industry growth and profit
over public health and safety, and places a high priority on maximizing domestic
fossil fuel extraction.
This would come as no surprise to the
industry, which as been foreshadowing such a scenario since the start of the year, and it makes it pretty much official: There is no need for any new
fossil fuel generation
over the next decade, and wind farms will dominate Australia's new build in the years to come.
Among those who have taken some interest in addressing climate change, there have
over the last decade or so been discussions about whether a focus on curtailing the activities of the
fossil fuel industries or a focus on reducing demand for
fossil fuels is the right single or leading method to move society into a transition away from
fossil energy.
A wave of legal challenges that is washing
over the oil and gas
industry, demanding accountability for climate change, started as a ripple after revelations that ExxonMobil had long recognized the threat
fossil fuels pose to the world.
«Drillers fear that federal protections for more threatened and endangered animals could drive up their costs at a time when the
industry is already battered by low oil prices, growing competition from renewable energy, and increasing attention from investors and regulators
over the climate - altering impacts of
fossil fuels,» DeSmog's Sharon Kelly wrote.
They announced their decision to move its entire investment portfolio out of the
fossil fuel industry over the next three years.
As the science of man - made climate change has become increasingly certain
over the last three decades of work by thousands of researchers, a cadre of deniers, often funded by
fossil fuel industries,... Continue reading →
«
Over the past 15 years my co-authors and I have been subject to a crescendo of by politicians, typically aligned closely with
fossil fuel interests or front groups advocating for the
fossil fuel industry, that see the need to discredit this iconic graphic.»
DT has also been a funder of part - time Smithsonian researcher and climate science denier Dr Willie Soon, whose other funding
over the last decade has come entirely from the
fossil fuel industry.
Actually, to many of us climate realists, the
fossil fuels industry has ceded too much ground to the climate alarmists
over the past decade.
It does: women's struggle is a big inspiration for people all
over the world to stand for what is right and organize in their communities, and that includes thousands of climate activists and people who, today, are facing and confronting the
fossil fuel industry.
In a conversation with Yale Environment 360 contributor Elizabeth Kolbert, he talks about what he's learned about the power of the
fossil fuel industry — and why the battle
over Keystone is far from
over.
According to a recent private report seen by Newsweek from the multinational banking and financial firm HSBC, «The speed of the collapse in energy prices
over the past three quarters has taken the
fossil fuel industry by surprise.»