Sentences with phrase «over the long run if»

While it might be appropriate in some cases to take on the assignment regardless, generally you'll feel better about yourself over the long run if you stick to your guns and don't allow yourself to lower your price.

Ironically, the thing many companies seem to care about the most (its stock price) would likely do much better over the long run if the distraction of worrying about analysts» ratings was eliminated.

Its a business decision and was likely the best value for us over the long run if we did not expect to sign him long term.

It's a very bad sign over the long run if Amazon wasn't making larger and larger failures.

Stocks only do well over the long run if profits do well.

That could make the Garmin cheaper than the Maestro over the long run if you plan to use that feature.

Not exact matches

Socking money away regularly and automatically does pay off in the long run, even if the market goes through the dramatic swings we've seen over the last 10 years.

If so, you'll run a small number of commercials over a long period of time.

If excubators have done anything, they have creatively brainstormed how to help more startups over the long run.

If you want a better deal, the best value would be purchasing a 36 month plan, as your monthly rate is much lower over the long run.

Most residential neighbors are not going to be very happy if you have noisy machinery running all day long, large trucks starting up early in the morning, or customers parking their vehicles all over the place.

How excellent would it be if leadership gave ample time for its teams to learn new procedures that over the long run produce better results?

But if you want to get the approval, budget, and participation, you need to run a successful program over the long - term.

There will be volatile times during the short - run, but I'm confident that over the long run, you will develop much greater wealth if you invest your cash.

You'll pay more in the long run due to interest, but if you're disciplined and invest the money you're not putting toward your loans, that could allow you to build up a higher net worth over the years.

If you understand how interest is calculated over the duration of the loan period and how quickly it can add up, you might be able to save some money in the long run.

Wells Fargo has run into problems of late following a scandal, revealed last September, in which thousands of its employees opened millions of fake accounts for unwitting customers over a decade and a half, if not longer.

If I assume a dividend growth rate of 6 percent (about the long - run average *), the current S&P 500 dividend yield of 2.1 percent (from multpl.com), a terminal S&P 500 dividend yield of 4 percent (Hussman says that the dividend yield on stocks has historically averaged about 4 percent), the expected nominal return over ten years is 2.4 percent annually.

Also, if you've got decent credit but have high interest credit card debt, you may be able to lower your card payments by considering the possibility of moving your balance over to balance transfer cards, but only if they turn out cheaper for you in the long run.

If any of those come back to be loved, the value of the index or ETF will go up, and over the long run, it could grow at a faster rate than the S&P 500.

If you wait until the last minute to invest in your TFSA and RRSP you could miss out on thousands of dollars over the long run

Even if real estate only tracks inflation over the long run, a 3 % increase on a property where you put 20 % down is a 15 % cash - on - cash return.

If they stayed with the primitive Greek / Roman stuff, they'd be run over by any others for barbarism long time ago.

Not sure where it will lead me yet (or if I'll stick with it in the long run)... but I've been entirely gluten - free for over a week now.

After the dough bakes initially, run a spatula around the edges and see if you can flip the crust over to bake a little bit longer.

If you are serious about blogging in the longer run, then go for business as it give you the most control over plugins, design etc..

While Im not worried about calories at the moment more worried about kicking the habit and making it stick I hadded a little more melted chocolate and powder to the mix so that it compensates for the super chocolate taste I love and once I can go without the soda I will cut it down but I figured if one or two can't take the craving away then no matter what the calories it will be helping me over come an addiction and in the long run if I can cut the chocolate down I will be a healthier person without severe struggle

Both at the ground and on TV replays, I saw no contact between Monreal and Redmond, for which Redmond went down clutching his face for some reason, when if there was any contact, which there wasn't, that was the least likely part of his anatomy to receive it, but which resulted in their goal, and Jason Long also went down clutching his face, after slight contact on his heel, which I didn't even see in the stadium, but his reaction was over exaggerated, and clearly inconsistent with any pain that he might of incurred, only for him to quickly recover and go running back up the field, when no notice was being paid to him, and a corner was being awarded in Arsenal's favour.

That is, if a system produces a 57 % winning percentage over 2,000 games, mathematicians say that there is a 95 % chance that the results are true (results will be better than 55 % in the long - run).

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

At 23, Carvalho is five years younger than Vidal, and although he has a # 37m release clause in his contract, he could be a much better investment in the long run, especially if he can bring his form from Sporting Club over to the Premiership.

players like Ozil always present the fans with a bit of a conundrum, especially when times are tough... if you look around the sporting world every once in awhile there emerges a player with incredible skill, like Ozil, Matt Sundin or even Jay Cutler, who have a different way about themselves... their movement seemed almost too lackadaisical, so much so that it seemed to suggest indifference or even disinterest on the part of the player... their posture always appears somewhat mopey and they generally have an unflattering «sour puss» expression on their face... for some their above average skills are enough to keep them squarely in the mix, as their respective teams try desperately to find a way to get the best out of them visa vie player acquisitions or the reworking of tactics... when things go according to planned the fans usually find a way to accept their unique disposition, whereas when things go awry they become easy targets for fans and pundits alike... in the case of Ozil and Sundin, their successes on the international stage and / or with their former teams led many to conclude that if we surrounded such talented individuals with players that have those skills that would most likely bring the best of these players success would surely follow... unfortunately both the Maple Leafs and our club chose to adopt half - measures, as each were being run by corporations who valued profitability over providing the best possible product on the field... for them, they cared more about shirt sales and season tickets than doing whatever was necessary... this isn't, by any stretch, an attempt to absolve Ozil of any responsibility for his failures on the pitch... there is no doubt oftentimes his efforts were underwhelming, to say the least, but this club has been inept when it comes to providing this prolific passer with the kind of players necessary for him to flourish... with our poor man's version of Benzema up front, the headless chickens in Walcott, the younger Ox and Welbeck occupying wide positions far too often and the fact that Carzola, who provided Ozil with great service and more freedom to roam, was never truly replaced, the only real skilled outlet on the pitch was Sanchez... remember to be considered a world - class set - up man goals need to be scored and for much of his time here he has been surrounded by some incredibly inept finishers... in the end, I'm not sure how long he will be in North London, recent sentiments and his present contract situation seem to suggest that he will depart at season's end, but how tragic would it be if once again we didn't put our best foot forward and failed to make those moves that could have brought championship football back to our once beloved club... so when you think about this uniquely skilled player don't be so quick to shift all the blame on his shoulders because he will not be the first or the last highly skilled player to find disappointment at the Emirates if we don't rid the club of those individuals that are truly to blame for our current woes

Xhaka, who I like, or at least I like the Xhaka who plays for the Swiss national squad, has shown to be in way over his head in the premiership... of course he showed late in the year that he can stretch the field with the long ball but our squad isn't really set - up for that style of play... most of his long passes are in the air not on the ground and our squad without Giroud, which should have been sold the minute the transfer window officially opened, is one of the smallest in England... we need someone who can pick out the runs of our forwards in the lanes and who is fast enough to come forward into space without conceding his defensive responsibilities... we rarely see him shoot or even be in a position on the field to do so, we rarely, if ever, see him used for set pieces and it appears that the only person at the club who has ever coached him up when it comes to tackling is Coq, which explains his atrocious disciplinary record... maybe it's me but didn't you see him coming in and contributing more from an offensive perspective, with his killer left foot, than a deep - lying midfielder... if that wasn't the case we are the stupidest team alive for taking him over Kante

It's easy to take your money and run, but if you truly have an edge there's no reason to think that you can't continue to profit over the long haul.

On Saturday, in a fixture United could ill - afford to lose if they were deadly serious about regaining their top - dog status in England by clinching 12th Premier League title, Ferguson made no less than seven changes to the team which won so convincingly at The Bridge for the visit of Fulham, with the likes of Edwin Van Der Saar, Rio Ferdinand, Michael Carrick and Wayne Rooney handed some valuable respite, though the latter was enforced on Sir Alex as Rooney served the first of a two - match suspension, which could be a blessing in disguise in the long run especially as United cruised to victory with a 2 - 0 win over Fulham in his absence.

But if you just need some personal opinions, let me help you; Apple does not make magical devices that suits everyone's needs, Google is not Skynet (yet) and will not take over the planet, and Microsoft buying Nokia may, in the long run, save both companies.

When I finally had a chance to speak, we were already running over the 2 1/2 hours allotted for the roundtable, so I was only able to briefly touch on two of my many message points: one, that the game can be and is being made safer, and two, that, based on my experience following a high school football team in Oklahoma this past season - which will be the subject of a MomsTEAM documentary to be released in early 2013 called The Smartest Team - I saw the use of hit sensors in football helmets as offering an exciting technological «end around» the problem of chronic under - reporting of concussions that continues to plague the sport and remains a major impediment, in my view, to keeping kids safe (the reasons: if an athlete is allowed to keep playing with a concussion, studies show that their recovery is likely to take longer, and they are at increased risk of long - term problems (e.g. early dementia, depression, more rapid aging of the brain, and in rare cases, chronic traumatic encephalopathy, and in extremely rare instances, catastrophic injury or death.)

Time frames and incentives may be mismatched if leave decisions produce «fuzzy,» long - run results when policy makers and businesses seek clear impact over shorter time horizons.

If the question is «does the electoral college advantages a state or an other, over the long run», then it is not really relevant that right now, some states are surely in one party's column and only a few are swing states.

Probably at least once if you've read the news: long - running studies show that just over half of US newspaper stories contain at least one error.

The long - running debate over genetically modified rice in the Philippines has intensified, with farmers warning of damage to their livelihoods if so - called «Golden Rice» is allowed to be commercially grown, while scientists argue it could save lives.

«But if you consistently bet the way they're going, then eventually over the long run they'll pay off.»

Paradoxically, the benefit to each farmer over the long run is less than if they had cooperated and each grazed fewer sheep.

However, if the existence of a relatively close, second companion (see Star Bc below) around Bab — with an orbital period of 2.2 to 2.9 years or less — is confirmed, then a planetary orbit in Star Ba's water zone may not be stable over the long run.

If you hit your weekly deficit within 5 - 10 %, it will even out over the long run.

In the long run, if this pattern continues, not only will Bob have better control over his weight than Sally, he will be much healthier in other ways (blood pressure, blood sugar, muscle mass, energy levels, inflammation levels, immune function, etc..)

If you lose muscle you lose metabolism, and if you slow that metabolism you are much more likely to gain fat over the long ruIf you lose muscle you lose metabolism, and if you slow that metabolism you are much more likely to gain fat over the long ruif you slow that metabolism you are much more likely to gain fat over the long run.

If you do decide to run barefoot, start with short runs and slowly progress to longer runs over time.

There's a lot of things where if you do the stuff over the long run, if you started in your 40s, 50s, continue on, your preservation of your pelvic floor and its function will be so much better, of course, than if you just let things go.

Indeed, the controversy over the benefits, if any, of salt reduction now constitutes one of the longest running, most vitriolic, and surreal disputes in all of medicine....