Sentences with phrase «over the shoulder view»

This new top allowed for a slightly wider rear seat and the additional windows halped with the over the shoulder view and the slightly claustrophobic feel of the previous generations.

It took a little bit to get used to the aiming and over the shoulder view again, but I'm enjoying it so far (only around 2 hours in).

The final game I played was a sort of Tag / Pac Man hybrid where I had an isometric view and map on the Wii U controller display while my opponents chased me from split - screen, third - person over the shoulder views on the TV.

Hold L trigger to aim and the game will switch over to an over the shoulder view with a slightly bigger targeting cursor.

Resident Evil was one of the first true survival horror games to really capture the attention of gamers, ranging from intense survival to edge of your seat scares, But as the franchise has grown there's been somewhat of an identity crisis between the old style fixed - camera movement and the newer over the shoulder view.

Shooter games come in two different versions; Third Person, the over the shoulder view, and First Person, you see as the character you play with.

Switching out the favoured top - down view of most MOBAs for a third - person, over the shoulder view that brings players closer to the action.

Not exact matches

So while there are certainly arguments to be made in favor of a rules - based Fed over the pure discretion of the current PhD standard, such reform should not be viewed as a solution to the real issue, which is a central bank having a monopoly on money at all.

Barclays said, given the growth in Netflix's programming over the past year, the number of hours viewed per subscriber should arguably have increased, not held steady.

While just over half of them felt it is «wrong» when such wide income disparities occur, around the same number of business leaders felt income inequality shouldn't be viewed as a problem.

Khan criticized Trump over the anti-Muslim retweets, saying «Britain First is a vile, hate - fuelled organisation whose views should be condemned, not amplified.»

In my view, investors should be thinking very seriously about the extent of potential market losses over the completion of the present market cycle.

With so many public statements in such a short time, we should have got our point of view over to everyone by now.

Just over half (53 %) are of the view that the ultimate authority rests with the federal government, while just under half (47 %) say provincial governments should have the power to «veto» projects in their jurisdictions.

In our view, the current market environment begs for investors to honestly assess their tolerance for loss, to align the duration of their investment portfolio with the horizon over which they expect to spend their assets; to consider their tolerance for missing returns should even this obscenely overvalued market continue to advance for a while; to understand historical precedents; to consider whether they care about such precedents; and to decide the extent to which they truly believe this time is different.

When a 1993 Angus Reid poll asked Canadians whether their country should «preserve its formal constitutional connection with the monarchy» or «move to abolish» it, roughly half (51 %) chose the latter option, suggesting that views on whether Canada should remain a monarchy over the long term have remained relatively stable over the last few decades.

While there is no doubt that a cooling of Chinese demand for commodities over the next few years will have an impact on Canada (as well as other resource exporting countries like Australia), China always takes the long term view and so should Canada.

It's our view that volatility should increase as the world moves from the pervasively synchronized easy monetary policy that we've seen over the past several years to the policy divergence that is showing up today.

Just over half (56 %) of UK agents, developers and overseas property professionals asked by OPP for their view on the hotly - debated EU referendum, say Britain should remain in...

While the majority of Canadians expressed support for an FTA with China and the percentage has grown significantly over time, we should not ignore the groups who are either opposed or undecided (see 2017 National Opinion Poll: Canadian Views on Engagement with China).

Whether you include small / value etc should really depend on your own view of how much these are likely to outperform the simple global market cap portfolio over the term of your retirement.

Debt currently accounts for over 40 % of total capital, a bit on the high side, in our view, though the company should be able to deleverage some in the years ahead.

While, a potential buy signal on the longer - term view may generate a target close to $ 28, the $ 26 level is expected to serve as a major resistance (i.e. resistance at $ 26 should take precedence over most other technical developments).

Honestly, in my view, (mainly because I can now see Christianity from the outside) suggesting, as Chris brings up, that «grace» plays a role or should play a role in the Christian life, well that makes no sense to me, because I see no need for this grace, especially if it is something that the Christians constantly need reapplied, over and over again.

I personally think religion should not be a factor.No one should ask the candidates what their religious views are and they should never mention them.Their religious preferences have absolutely no effect on what type of leader they will be.Unless they are some kind of a religious fanatic.I think it's time for an atheist.There was not a Christian president for over the first 50 years of our nations existence.And, I do not think there has been one since.If you look it up you will find not one of our founding fathers were Christian.Not even Jefferson.I know he wrote the Jefferson bible, but, that's just because he, like the other founding fathers, did not believe Jesus to be of divine decent.So, he kept his philosophy while removing all the mystical and dogmatic concepts.

Since conservatives comprise anywhere from 2 to 6 percent of faculty on the major campuses across the country, the fact that over 70 percent of the Calvin faculty chose not to sign the protest letter is stunning and should have been viewed as a positive.

Christians should not view those who advocate the redefinition of marriage as arch-enemies who are conspiring to take over the culture.

If you truly believe that your view of Scriptures is what is most orthodox, then instead of trying to conk each other over the heads, as brothers and sisters, we should be submitting our orthodoxy to the mercy seat.

From Ryan Lizza's enlightening profile in The New Yorker, I learned that Michele Bachmann's influences include spiritual and political mentors who preach the literal «inerrancy» of the Bible, who warn Christians to be suspicious of ideas that come from non-Christians, who believe homosexuality is an «abomination,» who portray the pre-Civil War South as a pretty nice place for slaves and who advocate «Dominionism,» the view that Christians and only Christians should preside over earthly institutions.

The evangelical should view such differences in theological method as signifying a health in the creative process, rather than a confusion over technique.

But I am resentful that I don't feel comfortable sharing my beliefs when they, and many in society think their world view should dominate over others.

Speaking of her call for «muscular liberalism» in the face of some religious schools promoting their views over others», Calvert said: «muscular liberalism shouldn't mean some kind of aggressive secularism - and that's the danger.

One big question I've been mulling over for the past five years or so is this «Is there such a thing as a SINGLE biblical world view, and even if so, is it a worldview that everyone should adopt?

Theo I'm not sure I should try to offer an over simplified view of politics, but it is not necessarily a bad thing for the politicians to have to make people happy to stay in office.

It is precisely for this reason that, after discussing the indeterminism of natural processes, I added the following proviso: «If we add to this (as free will theists should) that God generally refrains from exerting direct control over such indeterministic natural processes... etc.» I am well aware that some theological determinists combine their view with an acceptance of indeterminism in nature.

Rees boldly stated, at the time of publicity over Hawking's The Grand Design, «I know Stephen Hawking well enough to know that he has read very little philosophy and even less theology, so I don't think we should attach any weight to his views on this topic.»

Increasingly the movement drifted toward a view that women should he enfranchised in order to double the vote of the white, Protestant middle class and thereby assure the supremacy of this ruling class over the rising tide of blacks and immigrant Catholics and Jews.

I can only speak for myself, but no one should ever resort to violence about any views they hold, and especiwlly over football.

It's a shame really how people are so plastic over here.We seem to change our views so easily.Why can't people just make up their minds?It's like people don't have stance.As I've been saying and will keep saying we have many good players but as good as they are they're overrated.We've just compromised as a club.There are problems in every single role in the team, from defence to attack.Yet these problems will constantly be ignored.Some players are cleary not good enough but say it and the stats lovers will come out.The main problem wrong with the team is the centre.The other problem is Wenger and his misuse of players.I for one don't really rate Ramsey - Xhaka partnership in a sense that it's defensively weak with Xhaka not good enough defensively and Ramsey very inconsistent.The only player excellent defensively in the centre in Arsenal's team is Coquelin and I think he should be playing though many won'tsee why.Look how easily the balls went through the midfield.Coquelin should be partnered with another CM in our current team.People shouldn't deceive themselves Xhaka that Xhaka isn't a DM.He's just not good defensively admit it.We need a DM more than a CM in my opinion or a hybrid like Sanches or Jankto.

Though facts are facts and whoever's wrong on them should take ownership of it, let's not get into fighting over general views of the Wizards, and whether «Everybody Eats» is a good thing.

I believe that ALL Arsenal fans should be allowed to express their views and I provide this platform to allow their opinions to be discussed by Gooners all over the world.

«In view of the real atrocities taking place around the world, it seems remarkable that Jack Wilshere leaning over a railing singing songs containing some expletives should generate such an outcry.

I may be projecting a bit from my views on accountability in the corporate world, where I routinely see middle managers held responsible for results they never should've had purview over in the first place.

On a tangent Jon my son (he's 4) asked me why he should support Arsenal, I said «well because I do, you're granddad does and your great granddad did» I was going to say its because of the values and principles that our club has but then I stopped myself because I have no idea what they are anymore other than paying a has been manager and over hyped players a fortune for non achievement while being owned by a majority shareholder that has no interest in the club other than as a business and having a board that view the fans as the gift that keeps on giving.

This site was set up in February 2010 by a group of nomadic bloggers who rarely agree over the complexities of how our club should be run, but are united in their attitude towards healthy debate and the need for a forum where we can all air those views without ridicule.

The theory I've heard for the opposing view is that over more games luck becomes less of a factor, and if luck is less of a factor we should be comfortably floored.

There is still confusion about the recent position, or should I say positions, taken by NOCSAE over the past month, first deciding that the certification of any helmet with a third - party add - on would be viewed as automatically void, then, this past week, making a 180 - degree U-turn and leaving it up to the helmet manufacturers to decide whether affixing impact sensors to the inside or outside of a helmet voided the certification.

While it isn't possible for busy parents to look over their kids» shoulder all the time, do try to peek at what they're viewing when you can.

If you mount it properly, you should always be able to have a view of the entire crib — perfect for children that have a habit of rolling over in their sleep.

If you want a baby monitor that lets you view your baby, you should ask yourself if you want one that sends live videos over the internet to your smartphone and other devices.