This seems to me that Paul was adamant about dividing
over the theology of the Gospel.
He wasn't talking about me, of course, but he said that the big problem in the church today is that people read the Bible, they don't like what they read, and so they reject what the Bible clearly teaches because they prefer their own theology
over the theology of the Bible.
Not exact matches
You don't think there are any sincere disagreements
over fundamental aspects
of theology?
If you look around you, I think you'll find that the debates we're having are
over fundamental aspects
of theology — but people are so far from the truth that they seem like hairs to them.
from the University
of Virginia and has done graduate work in
theology at Tuebingen, feel such deep distress and ambivalence, even shame,
over their decision to stay at home for the sake
of their children.
At the end
of his essay, Griffiths gives the impression that Pitstick should have limited herself to a school debate with Balthasar
over the merits
of his
theology of Christ's descent rather than raising the formal question
of orthodoxy.
John Cavadini, chairman
of the
theology department at Notre Dame, focused on this during the 2006 debate
over the university's hosting
of a performance
of «The Vagina Monologues.»
East Eastern Christians see a dichotomy
of God and creation Eastern theologians are largely unaffected by modernism Eastern theologians do not agonize
over the existence
of God Eastern theologians systematize the transcendent, the miraculous, and the mystical into their
theology, without a concept
of «supernatural» Eastern theologians have coherent and helpful answers for most practical spiritual problems (such as during bereavement) Eastern clergy, monastics, and lay experts have resources for spiritual direction, moral direction, and Eastern clergy, monastics, and lay experts have resources for spiritual direction, moral direction, and bereavement counseling; thus they do not outsource religious problems to secular experts.
We know from their actions
of today how Christians think they're being «persecuted» if they can't festoon their religious holiday decorations all
over everybody's property and make everybody else recite Christian prayers at all public occasions or stamp their
theology on our money and insert it into our pledge
of allegiance.
Enlightenment Philosophers founded empirical sciences Western theologians attempt to apply empiricism to
theology Western theologians agonize
over the existence
of God Western theologians lose, deemphasize, neglect, marginalize, or explain away the supernatural Western theologians no longer have coherent answers for many practical religious questions Western churches outsource the treatment
of religious problems to secular therapists
For the last three weeks, I've received dozens
of angry tweets and YouTube comments
over my article «The
Theology That's Dividing Christian Hip - Hop,» ranging from calling me a bad journalist to accusations that I can't possibly be a Christian.
bleeds
over into larger areas
of theology â $ «is man inherently good or evil or both?
In my opinion, the bullies who use their interpretation
of theology and Bible verses to bash others
over their (figurative) heads are among the most difficult.
I should point out that biblical studies has a distinct advantage
over theology when it comes to finding a place in the university, since it is a historical discipline which can and often does just as well locate elsewhere — for instances in a department
of Near East studies.
Over the next fourteen years the Braatens and the Jensons (both men's wives participated actively in the center's work) collaborated in activities» conferences, seminars, and, most notably, production
of the journal Pro Ecclesia» that expanded from a Lutheran core to give ecumenical witness to the great tradition
of catholic
theology.
Considering that it took the Church about 300 years, long after they had made up their minds about
theology, to start picking scripture to match that doctrine, and that the oldest known copt
of the bible has
over 27,000 «corrections» written all
over it, how can you be sure that the New Testament isn't full
of false doctrine to begin with?
Over the years, I have observed the bulk
of the Evangelical fleet drift — and then in desperation for some greater motivation, change fuels — from the open - arms gasoline
of evangelism meetings, to the super-sparks
of charismatic gifts, to the sluggish - diesel
of homogenized Biblical
theology, to the stuttering - and - sparkle fuel
of Christian music, to the nitro - flamed - fuel
of hating gays, and now to the turbo - charged hatred
of illegal aliens at home and Muslims overseas.
Over the past 40 years, since the Second Vatican Council (1962 - 65), the Catholic Church in the U.S. has become increasingly divided over liturgy, theology, catechesis, ministry, sexuality and a host of other iss
Over the past 40 years, since the Second Vatican Council (1962 - 65), the Catholic Church in the U.S. has become increasingly divided
over liturgy, theology, catechesis, ministry, sexuality and a host of other iss
over liturgy,
theology, catechesis, ministry, sexuality and a host
of other issues.
Over the course
of the tumultuous 1960s, Braaten's politics moved for a time somewhere beyond liberal, and his
theology developed accordingly.
The real sad thing is that
over 4,000 former members and leaders
of this church are now directly affected and suffering because one bully used his pulpit to twist
theology to his way
of thinking.
David Hayward: Master
of Theology, Diploma in Ministry,
over 30 years professional pastoral experience.
There has been a flood
of writings in this field
over the past ten years, proposing various
theologies of religious pluralism and systematizing those that have been proposed.
«[In Moltmann's
theology] the comprehensive work
of the Spirit interacts with humanity in pervasive ways, calling each person to a renewed relationality and an emphasis
of life
over death in their particular contexts.
In his usual manner, Pieper pushes philosophical inquiry up to and sometimes a little
over the edge
of theology, but is always respectful
of the indispensable part
of revelation in attaining true wisdom.
The forums
over at Free Grace Churches are (so far) a pretty fair and gracious place to discuss all areas
of theology and church practice, and do have some fairly controversial posts.
If I can be brutally honest I didn't think this video would get much
over a couple thousand views maybe, and because
of that, my points /
theology wasn't as air - tight as I would've liked.
We sat in two comfy armchairs in the foyer
of his beautiful, brand - new church building, and for
over an hour talked about Reformed
theology.
Oh, and by the way, we will eventually be considering all
of these items (and others) in the
theology forums
over at Free Grace Churches.
I'd take a deep / meaningful conversation with a human being (
of any faith / non-faith)
over a volume
of systematic
theology any day.
It has been difficult to not be bitter
over a degree in
theology that has done nothing for me, other than give me a great deal
of debt!
Anyway, I was compelled to adopt the Christus Victor view
of the atonement and it has been running roughshod
over much
of my
theology and changing the way I read many texts
of Scripture, including this one...
Pannenberg tantalized American readers in 1969 when he announced in
Theology and the Kingdom
of God, in the midst
of the debate
over the presumed death
of God, that, strictly speaking, «God does not yet exist.»
I conclude, once again, that herculean efforts at reconceptualizing
theology's quandary
over the interrelatedness
of God's power and [97] love simply have not brought sufficiently fresh insight to the task.
SBC president Bryant Wright offered a «word» for both Calvinists («A bit
of humility would be most welcome») and traditional Southern Baptists («The time for judgmentalism is
over») as he told attendees to focus on the Great Commission instead
of the
theology of salvation.
A large area
of historic Christian
theology would have been completely altered if ideas
of atonement, especially as related to the blood
of Christ, had not been carried
over from primitive concepts associated with animal sacrifice.
And there is, in fact, very little evidence that champions
of ecclesial pluralism have bent
over backwards to insure that their opponents are given a fair hearing on occasions
of public debate, nor are they conspicuously tolerant or open - minded when they happen themselves to be in positions
of extra-ecclesial authority — as journal editors, perhaps, or as deans
of theology faculties.
During the debate
over «biblical inerrancy» that raged among evangelicalism for several years in the late 1970s, I remember someone observing that Harold Lindsell's 1976 book, The Battle for the Bible, which pretty much got that debate going, was more a theory
of institutional change than it was about
theology as such.
Process is a
theology that has grown
over the last 100 years from the philosophy
of Mr. Whitehead.
While theological battles were being waged in Lutheranism, the general unrest
over theology was evident in the reception
of the two greatest mid-nineteenth century American preachers and theologians.
In the present Discipline the church affirms its openness to divergent theological traditions and projects, declaring that the UMC's «theological spectrum... ranges
over all the current mainstream options and a variety
of special interest
theologies as well.»
In this way Christian
theology becomes both the defender
of religion
over against the onesidedness and superficiality
of Marx's critique
of religion, and at the same time the ally
of this critique against the «alienation»
of man.
As to the rest
of your reply, well, your
theology appears to be all
over the shop, my friend.
Hauerwas, who teaches
theology at Duke, holds these seemingly eclectic commitments together with a Reformed (via Barth) emphasis on the priority
of God's Word
over any human attempt to think
of or live well before God, and a Wesleyan insistence on God's call to complete sanctification in this life.
I, however, having been raised Baptist for
over 20 years and then deciding to convert to the Catholic faith after taking several formal classes in
theology, philosophy, and history, at least have the benefit
of seeing both sides
of the Catholic - Protestant split.
H. Richard Niebuhr taught us in The Kingdom
of God in America that the triune themes
of the sovereignty
of God
over the whole world, the reign
of Christ in the heart and the expectation
of a Coming Kingdom in and beyond time were all embedded in the term «kingdom
of God,» and that these themes were decisive in the way Christian
theology and ethics provided — with differing accents in different periods — a spiritual and moral rudder for American civilization, from its founding through the industrial era.
He writes: «We need only survey the chronic and significant differences
of opinion
over the systematic grounding
of natural law today, as well as the extraordinarily complicated and controversial skirmish lines
over questions
of moral
theology, to see that this is so.»
The philosophical «God» is understood, if not independently
of religious intuition, then definitely beyond its singular appearance (RM 88) 43
Over against the philosophical approach, Christianity developed the double strategy which we have analyzed as «religious intuition» contributing finally to the formation
of revelational
theology:» (1) Christianity proceeded not from any metaphysics, but it «has always been a religion seeking a metaphysics» (RM 50).45 Christianity strove for theological rationalization, 46 (2) Christianity, however, did not follow any certain metaphysics (PR 66 - 68), but «has been true to its genius for keeping its metaphysics subordinate to the religious fact to which it appeals» (RM 69).
Indeed, they hand
over that public role
of theology to the coercive tactics
of a resurgent reaction announcing itself as the «Moral Majority.»
I'm weeping
over this story ashamed
of how my
theology may have contributed to other's reacting as the father did in this story.
In perceiving
theology as a science, Pannenberg suggests that if God is ultimate truth, then the God hypothesis — the claim that God is the unity
of all reality — must include within itself the current debate
over God's existence.