Sentences with phrase «over the universe for»

ACME Corporation, the corporate juggernaut behind such successful products as the Acme Disintegrator Gun and the Acme Portable Hole, is sponsoring a number of racing contests all over the universe for the Looney Tunes characters to compete for the looniest racing champion title.

ACME Corporation, the corporate juggernaut behind such successful products as the Acme Disintegrator Gun and the Acme Portable Hole, is sponsoring a number of racing contests all over the universe for the Looney Tunes characters

Not exact matches

And the massive amount of consolidation that's swept over the Canadian media sector in recent years — Bell, Rogers and Shaw have a lock on much of the market — has created openings for a nimble, smaller player that can fill niches in a TV universe overwhelmed by me - too reality shows.

Over the full period analyzed, the benchmark has returned 6.9 % to investors versus 8.1 % for the comparative universe, but much of the performance in more recent years remains unrealized.

You'll receive our proprietary data and metrics for over 1,000 of the top firms in our equity coverage universe to help you pick and screen the best stocks for either you or your clients.

ER, think for a minute, with God making an entire universe billions of years ago, he's not going to fall over dead after making people.

Sometimes these things get in the way of our real understanding of the universe, but over the long term, science is the best method for finding truth.

nope... he is way too busy running for relection for MASTER OF THE UNIVERSE... right now his running mate is He - man, they meet bi-weekly at castle Grey Skull for cookies and beer to go over progress.

If something has fine - tuned the parameters, that could indicate the existence of an intelligent fine - tuner — but this is pretty much guesswork: it could as easily be that the parameters vary slightly over very large distances, in which case life would be expected to turn up in those regions of the universe that are suited for life.

Either they necessitate a deceptive «God», e.g. creating starlight «in transit» which means that for some light the star that supposedly sent said light would never have actually existed, or they would cause effect that should be evident but are not, e.g. temporarily fast starlight would effectively cook many things, such as life on earth, if the required light (and attendant gamma radiation) were compressed into a significantly shorter time frame (think of the radiation from the apparent 13 billion years of the universe arriving at the same time, or even over a 1000 years).

what is very interesting to me tonite is the folks who are positive there is no god... what is equally interesting is the snarling that appears whenever one does not «toe» the atheist line of no god... It has been said over and over here, «there is no proof of your God» ad nauseum I might add... OK... please, I am asking you in the nicest possible way... explain to me, without a Designed, where the universe and all it entails, first got its source... I really would like to know... from everything I see, I see beauty, design, tragedy, poetry, poverty, etc.... How did we begin to name or classify any of this... what intelligence gave us our intelligence... I have yet to see an anwer posited as to how it all came about, absent a Designer... I will wait for an answer... How did it ALL get here, and explain the precision and engineering of it all — right down to the last jot of DNA.

Advances in cosmological science over the latter half of the 20th century began to reveal that when the universe came into existence, (more on that later), the fundamental forces it was birthed with were apparently «fine - tuned» to allow for the emergence of life.

NONE of you have proof of «God's» existance... a made up fairy tale created by people who lived over 2,000 years ago as a way to explain the universe and apply a general set of laws... yeah, it was great for the time... i guess... but there is no place for religion in today's societies.

If one really thinks about it, the multiverse is impossible over the entire period of eternity (which is what atheists would propose for the age of the «invisible» part of our universe — if such a thing exists at all).

Rather than postulate a supreme being, one could suggest that a particular universe with OUR set of physical laws might in fact allow itself to become conscious, by making it possible for biologic beings to develop and allowing it ALL over our particular Universe.

I suppose he hasn't been getting older for over a decade now, since he's outside the realm of time (marked by our aging bodies and physical universe).

It is a vision of the final victory of God's cause over all powers in the universe; it is also a vision of (expected) historical victory for Israel over its oppressors.

It ought to mean nothing short of this new reach of freedom for us, with the struggle over, the keynote of the universe sounding in our ears, and everlasting possession spread before our eyes.

If the universe has been developing over aeons for the coming of the Word, then St John's place as the «Voice for the Word» is essential to God's plan.

Russ, then why such an uproar in 1633 when the Catholic church went after Galileo for Heresy over suggesting the Sun was the center of the universe and the earth revolved around the sun.

David, pondering that before the Almighty in Psalm 8, is struck by how the wonders of the universe provide little reason for a man to assume a position of importance, and yet, «You have made him ruler over the works of your hands.»

For Piaget, the ontological egocentricity of the child was due primarily to the fact that the child does not yet differentiate its selfhood from the Being of the universe (RME 110, 241); therefore, the child is not yet conscious of itself as being other over against the world and, therefore, interprets the whole reality according to its own experience.

As realm after realm was taken over by natural law, for many people God was escorted to the frontiers of the universe and bowed out.

25 His work was marred by a distinction between God and «Godhead»: «God is deity conceived in relation, over against the universe, its cause or ground, it law and end; but the Godhead is deity conceived according to His own nature, as He is from within and for Himself.»

His whole code and one's allegiance to it suggest, however, that somehow, somewhere, human beings have acquired the faculty of imposing meaning on the meaningless; and this imposed order becomes a kind of substitute for an intelligible universe, which may or may not be presided over by a Nature greater than our own.

Your problem is that we have actual evidence that the universe is 13.7 billion years old, that the earth is 4.5 billion years old, and that modern humans have been here for over 200,000 years.

If your invisible, untraceable alien claims responsibility for the creation of the universe and life on this planet, if your invisible, untraceable alien created a race of people, led them out of slavery in a foreign land, appeared to them countless times, spoke thru prophets to them over thousands of years, and all of that interaction was successively captured in a book over those thousands of years..

Ask them if Mormans, when they die, themselves become gods, the same as Jesus, and have our own individual «universe» to rule over for the rest of eternity.

When nature is understood after the fashion of scientific materialism this cleavage is quite intelligible For the only way to salvage the singularity of persons Out of the deterministic commonality of a materialistic view of nature is to locate the core of personality at a separate level of reality over against the impersonal universe.

It is especially puzzling why the deity of traditional free will theism, who created the universe for the sake of soul - building, would have taken over 10 billion years simply to set the stage, employing an evolutionary process involving hundreds of millions of years of animal suffering prior to the rise of human beings.

Now we have others waiting for this day to be over so they can be «called home» while the rest of us are either destroyed in the end of the universe, or must survive in a «Left Behind» world.

That democracy can be made to work, that by the scientific method we can gain mastery over the latent resources of the universe, that trial by jury is practicable, that torture is a foolish method of seeking evidence in the courts, that chattel slavery is a failure — such things we take for granted, not because we individually are wiser than our forebears, who disbelieved them all, but because we share in a social tradition which we did not even help to create, but which has shaped and conformed our thinking with irresistible power.

Remember when he was the centre of the universe for a few weeks as he hovered over the Irish Sea debating w -LRB-...)

It stated: «Whereas sovereignty over the entire universe belongs to God Almighty alone and the authority which He has delegated to the state of Pakistan through its people for being exercised within the limit prescribed by Him is a sacred trust.»

For example, some simulated universes behave like an old arcade game — if you walk to one edge of the universe, you cross back over to the other side, like Pac - Man exiting the right side of the screen and reappearing on the left.

Nevertheless, over the years we have developed a strong intuition for what counts as «natural» — and the universe we see does not qualify.

As similar dust grains are thought to be found in solar systems all over the universe, this bodes well for the existence of life across the cosmos.

For instance, our universe, meaning the entire world line of our universe over all time and space, could be a member of the set of all possible such universes permitted by the same rules that govern ours.

In recent decades, advances in telescopes and sensing equipment have allowed scientists to detect a vast amount of data hidden in the «white noise» or microwaves (partly responsible for the random black and white dots you see on an un-tuned TV) left over from the moment the universe was created.

Clocks that gain or lose no more than a fraction of a second over the lifetime of the universe could be on the way, thanks to a technique for cutting through the «heat haze» that compromises the accuracy of today's instruments.

«Their work provides a framework for understanding why matter vastly dominates over antimatter in our universe.»

LONG BEACH, CALIF. — One of the oddities of the universe revealed over the past decade is that galaxies and the giant black holes at their hubs fit together as if they were made for each other.

«For the first time, we are not only visualizing the detailed structure of our Local Supercluster of galaxies but we are seeing how the structure developed over the history of the universe.

But for some unknown reason, scientists have said, there was a tiny bit more matter than antimatter left over after the Big Bang, so after the initial annihilation, the leftover matter became all the things we see in the universe now.

In the early universe, the differences might have created a preponderance of matter over antimatter that would account for the universe's current composition.

A non-zero charge would have meant that the antiproton in the nucleus and the positron buzzing around it have slightly different charges, which would violate the rules of the Standard Model of particle physics and possibly provide an explanation for the dominance of matter over antimatter in the universe.

Over the years, they have tried on several different models of the universe that dodge the need for a beginning while still requiring a big bang.

«The discovery is telling us that galaxies as faint as this one exist, and we should continue looking for them and even fainter objects so that we can understand how galaxies and the universe have evolved over time.»

For example, if dark energy weakens over time, then the universe could contract and end up in a «big crunch» — and it would never get old enough for Boltzmann brains to foFor example, if dark energy weakens over time, then the universe could contract and end up in a «big crunch» — and it would never get old enough for Boltzmann brains to fofor Boltzmann brains to form.

FEEDBACK has been mulling over the best strategies to overcome the universe's appetite for single socks, a crucial matter when we're digging out our stockings to hang by the fire.