People can always debate an idea; people have always killed each other
over their belief systems.
Not exact matches
He is the editor of several investing newsletters with the central
belief that «a disciplined quantitative analysis
system can discover stocks that should significantly outperform the overall market
over the long term.»
Doctrine
Over Person is taking many of the experiences you've had and either denying they ever existed or suppressing / avoiding them in order to perpetuate the
belief system of the cult.
Compare that to the dogmatic stance of religion — a phony
belief system that starts and end with unproven manmade tribal myths, not open to true debate, and that only changes in order to maintain power
over the gullible.
These
belief system seek to trascend whatever sociopolitical environment their adherents find themselves in by asserting universal ideals
over cultural traditions.
Unfortunately, your way of thinking has been proven to be detrimental
over and
over again by those Atheists with working brains (only 8 % of scientists claim to have a
belief system in the super natural).
There are many people in communities like this all
over the world and in all
belief systems, most cases in spite of the
belief system, it is in these communities that humanity will survive and thrive.
Over the course of human history there have been thousands of such
belief systems, with no
beliefs they all share.
This is certainly an interesting article which raises a legitimate question for those of faith as well as for those without any specific spiritual
belief system: Does God care who wins and if so, why and how much and what influence does He have
over the outcome?
I know my
belief system has changed quite a bit
over the years.
At any rate, ANY
belief system that advocates division
over unity is not based on Godly intentions any way.
It is a complex MASSIVE
belief system that has developed
over the last 2010 years.
However, in my own experience and research, Christianity has offered the most compelling evidence
over any other
belief system.
I guess evangelicals also aim to take control of the gubment and force us all to convert at gun - point (or as many also believe, at welfare - check revocation point)-- their unabashed fervor to take
over the military academies and promote their
belief system there is shockingly bold.
The stories and
belief systems changed and evolved
over time but before the scientific method came into play, there was little reason not to accept the religious explanations for why the world was the way it was.
Not to shove religion down anyone's throat as a number of response think it would, nor to tout one
belief system over another.
If you have a sane, coherent and logical point to make about the merits of your
belief systems over any other than please, present it here.
But religion, unfounded self - reinforcing
systems of
belief that can have powerful, often negative influences
over virtually all parts of our lives, shouldn't have a place any more than mal - ware has a place on our computers.
In the U.S., what I care about is when they want to crap all
over different people in differing ways because they differ and don't agree with one another; and because this conflicted nature of the Christian
belief system is thus often used as a weapon of bigotry.
What Jeremy has highlighted is just how much of our
belief system has been influenced by church history and politics
over 2000 yrs.
Jeremy has shown me
over the past couple of years how to challenge my existing
belief system arising from (as Neville describes as) «moral / legal covenant interpretation of the gospel».
She herself followed a spiritual path alighned with American Indian
belief system, but she expressed to me that Highe Pwer meant anything you Believe to be more powerful than you... after deep thought
over much time I found that I believe the ocean was more powerful than me and began the path of giving
over my poerlessness to the sea... been sober for 24 years and thay has evoved int not just the sea, but rocks.
Over the years I have learned that it is just easier to do so, since I'm not looking for opportunities to educate my fellow Americans about the joys of atheism; it's just my
belief system.
The Jews will continue with their
belief system all through eternity while those that choose to leave the fold do so slowly
over the course of two or three generations.
In their quest for righteousness, they often become self righteous, using their
belief system as a weapon, to bash
over the heads of others, rather than as a tool to improve their own lives and to become a living example of what true christians should be like or what truly compassionate humans should be like, it's very sad, that so many christians don't have a clue how to act like decent people, and that they are hypocrites and full of hate.
No religion or
belief system is given a preference
over the other, including Atheists such as myself.
I have no Seminary experience, but I consider myself autodidactic and my thirst for knowledge has lead me all
over the gamut of
belief systems in Christianity (I ended up a staunch Calvinist until recently).
So because Medieval Europeans hooked on one religion created a calendar
system centuries afterward, and
over time, with the expansion of empire, it came to become the primary
system, you think that's some proof of your
beliefs?
The
belief systems that gave us Ishtar, Habakuk, Isis, Osiris, Zeus, Hera, Frigga, Thor, Jupiter, Mars, Vishnu, Shiva, Elohim, Yaweh, Allah, AND God (just to name a SCANT few
over the course of Human history - but, then again, if you're the kind of Xtian that believes the Earth is only 6000 years old, then you won't have much of a favorable view of what the remainder of us refer to AS «history»).
My husband and I have exposed our kids to as many
belief systems as we could
over the years.
Reprogrammed
belief system, decided after originally planning elective caesarean that home birth was the go, committed time and energy into being pregnancy and preparing for birth, faith
over fear, comfortable with midwife after devoting time and energy into the relationship, created vision board and reflected daily, music at birth, swayed body, focused inwards, concentrated on breath, support from partner, relief in water pool, slipped in and out of dreamlike consciousness, caught baby in own hand s, profound spiritual connection, trusting
A lot of the work in the «NEW Age Movement» has to do with rewiring our
belief systems, learning to let go of the old agreements that unfortunately have been reinforced
over time and now are so hard to get rid of.
Over the 20 years since my autoimmune disorder introduced me to concepts beyond my
belief system, my life has benefited extraordinarily.
The hour that I spent playing VR games only reinforced my
belief in this medium's potential to take
over eLearning and Learning Management
Systems as we know them.
While the eastern half of the United States has been taken
over by patriarchal, Christian fundamentalists, these women rule with the consent of men, and share a pagan, nature - oriented
belief system.
One approach to dealing with religions and
belief systems is to design specific subjects taught
over a number of years.
Over two days, these experts focused on fundamental
beliefs to help surface design principles for these next - generation
systems, as well as the key tensions and challenges that must be addressed for them to become a reality.
But we must start by recognizing two clear realities, so well outlined by Charles Barone and Mac LeBuhn of Democrats for Education Reform: (1) those who want to overhaul public education are taking on a culture, a philosophy, and a
belief system that has been in place for
over a century.
Over the past thirteen years, as an educator, school leader, and now as the CEO of a charter management organization operating three schools in New Orleans, those lessons have stuck with me and helped me define my
belief system as it relates to students.
But yet, traditional publishing, college professors, and just about anyone who even thinks about the writer behind the words has a
belief system that words must be struggled
over to be good.
These competing
belief systems, Klontz explains, are usually at the root of conflicts
over money.
Messages left on the ground by other players are still an integral part of the experience — my
belief is that this
system is in there for a reason and I choose to use messages whenever I find them, even though many of them promise rare items just
over the edge of every cliff in the game (Protip: The items are a lie).
About the Artist
Over the course of his four - decade career, Mike Kelley (1954 — 2012) produced a provocative and rich oeuvre that conflates the highest and lowest forms of popular culture in a relentless critical examination of social relations, cultural identity, and
systems of
belief.
It may influence funding and allow advocates to take
over bureaucracies, but it is not a new relativism bending reality to a new
belief system.
And so what is the point of telling me my personal
belief system «has immutable structure» — ie, is «unchanging
over time or unable to be changed.»?
Interestingly, this included reinforcing the
belief system within the group as well as outside it by dishonest means, such as glossing
over problems in research being produced for public consumption.
Thus, by substituting the term «photo voltaic» for «solar», RC is attempting to pull the wool
over the eyes of the scientific community to perpetuate their own
belief system.
Since to me (and many scientists, although some wanted a lot more corroborative evidence, which they've also gotten) it makes absolutely no sense to presume that the earth would just go about its merry way and keep the climate nice and relatively stable for us (though this rare actual climate scientist pseudo skeptic seems to think it would, based upon some non scientific
belief — see second half of this piece), when the earth changes climate easily as it is, climate is ultimately an expression of energy, it is stabilized (right now) by the oceans and ice sheets, and increasing the number of long term thermal radiation / heat energy absorbing and re radiating molecules to levels not seen on earth in several million years would add an enormous influx of energy to the lower atmosphere earth
system, which would mildly warm the air and increasingly transfer energy to the earth
over time, which in turn would start to alter those stabilizing
systems (and which, with increasing ocean energy retention and accelerating polar ice sheet melting at both ends of the globe, is exactly what we've been seeing) and start to reinforce the same process until a new stases would be reached well after the atmospheric levels of ghg has stabilized.
If their view is that CO2 = CAGW is «dogmatic garbage», I'll listen to them
over a True Believer who has no convincing scientific evidence supporting his
belief system.
unecessary to the agw
belief system yet fought
over as if it were a relic welcome back do u support lying?