«Such efforts should be recognized as the act of desperate people who have simply lost the argument
over whether human activities are primarily driving climate change and who can not face up to the truth.»
Trump's pick to lead the Environmental Protection Agency, Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt, is a prominent denier of climate science, writing in the National Review in May that «the debate is far from settled»
over whether human activity has contributed to the warming of the earth.
However, the debate
over whether human activities are responsible for all, some, or none of the recent climate change remains very much alive and well.
Global warming is controversial, of course, but the controversy is mainly
over whether human activity is driving it.
«There's a lot of controversy
over whether humans even perceive pheromones.
Researchers have discovered tell - tale signs of Alzheimer's disease in 20 elderly chimpanzee brains, rekindling a decades - old debate
over whether humans are the only species that develop the debilitating condition.
The Last Days of the Neanderthals The proven proximity has fostered a debate
over whether humans and Neanderthals might have mated with each other as well.
This is clearest in the Americas, where the debate
over whether humans or climate caused Late Pleistocene extinctions has raged for decades (the truth is probably a combination of these two factors, including a trophic cascade caused by human - mediated extinctions of large carnivores).
Questions
over whether humans should mess with AI, genetics and so -LSB-...]
In the meantime, it's best not to get too fixated on debates
over whether humans, through the building greenhouse effect, are causing or contributing to epic deluges like those in Pakistan, Nashville, Oklahoma City and elsewhere of late.
Not exact matches
«If it's just straight health insurance, which I would bet it is,» says Suzanne Lucas, an Inc.com columnist and
human resources expert, «then this is just a policy, and they're not going to have a say
over whether it's Jane, who's happily married, or Stacey, who's a lesbian.»
As businesses evolve
over time, it's important to examine
whether your
human resources and staffing model is optimized in support of your current and future needs.
Over the next three years EPA will study
whether the listed chemicals present an «unreasonable risk to
humans and the environment.»
In addition to suing
over Clean Power Plan regulations, Pruitt has argued that climate activists should be prosecuted, and that debate
over whether climate change is
human - made should be encouraged in classrooms and Congress — despite overwhelming scientific evidence that the debate is settled.
This ties into the long standing debate that has been occurring
over the past year about
whether human workers will be needed if technology becomes increasingly sophisticated.
Unfortunately,
humans seem to forget this fact when we find ourselves turning to nature to guide us through difficult choices, such as arguments about
whether life begins at conception, or
over the proper structure of the family.
Could it be God likes to see all these grubby
humans groping around, arguing with each other
over how long our hair can be and
whether to cut our beards?
i'm an avid believer in the power of the
human mind to
over come most problems
whether they are man vs. nature, man vs. man or man vs. the supernatural... we can conquer most obsticules placed in our path.
Prepare your selves for the worse coming now others will try to copycat him... shame really that
human is
over taken by the evil forces
whether he is Religious or non religious... killing is evil.evil.evil..
Then, too, it will presumably be possible to leave it an open question
whether the history of
human descent as known to us does or does not possess features which only after the Fall of the first man can be thought of to some extent as a predominance of his pre-
human past and of his environment,
over a sensitivity to the world around him no longer protected by the gift of integrity, and
over his lack of adaptation to a particular milieu.
While Paul's thought is by no means always clear, and perhaps from letter to letter not always exactly the same, it is nevertheless certain that his concept of resurrection can be clearly distinguished from that of the traditional «bodily resurrection».27 Paul does not speak in terms of the «same body» but rather in terms of a new body,
whether it be a «spiritual body», 28 «the likeness of the heavenly man», 29 «a house not made by
human hands, eternal and in heaven», 30 or, a «new body put on»
over the old.31 In using various figures of speech to distinguish between the present body of flesh and blood and the future resurrection body, he seems to be thinking of both bodies as the externals which clothe the spirit and without which we should «find ourselves naked».32 But he freely confesses that the «earthly frame that houses us today ’33 may, like the seed, and man of dust, be destroyed, but the «heavenly habitation», which the believer longs to put on, is already waiting in the heavenly realm, for it is eternal by nature.
After a long period of dispersion
over the whole earth, the
human race is now being pushed together,
whether we are ready for it or not.
In fact, if we agree with him that
human experiences of as brief a duration as one - tenth of a second may be distinguished in consciousness, and if we disregard the problem of
whether a sleeping person also experiences at about the same rate of ten occasions per second, then simple arithmetic enables us to conclude that the concrete reality of a
human being that lives seventy years is well
over two billion individual «selves»!
Jesus Christ, is and it will be forever more the unique object lesson of living, the
human being not ever, although we may be Christians we don't leave of to sin, for the very her writing she says Aerquémonos confiadamente at the throne of your handsomeness in order to reach forgiving in order to the perpetual help, in as much as not tenemos one God which not it can feel pity for of we, rather one which fué tempting all
over, but without sin, according to the letter at the age of Hebrews, and the apostle John she says,
whether various hubiere sin, solicitor tenemos in order to with the parent to Jesus Christ the that's right, not ever not any
human being it will be the best object lesson not other than The Christ Jesus, nor Buddah bo Mahoma nor none, we don't follow to humanity rather at a God which fué tempting all
over but without sin, not ever we owe put her scope in the humanity not other than in the.
Has nothing to do with actual fossils that demonstrate an evolution of a single species
over time;
whether dogs, cats, monkeys, birds, or
humans.
Over the next months and years, the American people will confront again the question that Lincoln posed at Gettysburg:
whether a nation conceived in liberty and dedicated to
human equality can long endure.
For him the revelation of God as attested by Scripture stands
over against contemporary
human culture,
whether religious or secular, with the divine Word of promise and judgment.
His subject, as one might expect, was theology and the philosophy of science, and he argued that the biblical concept of the Holy spirit may provide the missing link, so to speak, in the controversy
over whether mind or language has precedence in the creation of
human thought.
Whether the ontological claim is true or false,
humans have authority
over the animal kingdom.
The fact is, of course, that
whether by wind and tide, or by giant walls of water which formed between a dry pathway through the midst of the sea, what is affirmed is the Lord's Power
over all power -
human power as represented by Pharaoh's host, and natural power as represented by the wind and waves (see Matt.
Whether they believe it was written by God / god or a
human author (let alone translated from one language to another
over many years and the interpretations of those words taught / passed down
over many years with many different understandings which formed with even the best intentions by men and women who were products of their time and place?)
In the previous chapter I have already stated that I do not think it lies within
human knowledge to say
whether God's final victory
over evil and the final consummation of his kingdom will come within
human history or beyond it.
So let's just say that I think about
human behavior a lot,
whether that involves puzzling
over relationships, behavior change, or why
humans do what they do (this election has provided plenty of fodder in the latter department).
Gordon Brown has announced a compromise on the
human fertilisation and embryology bill, after weeks of speculation
over whether Labour MPs would be whipped into supporting the bill.
Ministers are set for a showdown with Tory rebels
over the immigration bill after it was confirmed a crucial amendment backed by restive backbenchers will be debated in the Commons.The amendment, supported by dozens of Tory MPs, would give ministers rather than judges the final say
over whether deportation would breach the
human rights of foreign criminals.Commons Speaker John Bercow selected the amendment tabled by Esher and Walton MP Dominic Raab in the first group for debate, meaning there will be time for a vote.
Nearly 100 MPs, many of them thought to be Tory backbenchers, voted in favour of giving ministers rather than judges the final say
over whether deportation would breach the
human rights of foreign criminals.
These include the safety of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and foods grown with pesticides, the use of animals in research,
whether climate change is mostly due to
human activity, and
whether humans have evolved
over time.
Opinion is closely divided when it comes to the fundamental question of
whether these potential developments are «meddling with nature» and cross a line that should not be crossed, or
whether they are «no different» from other ways that
humans have tried to better themselves
over time.
Because the results hinted that
human viruses might be similarly manipulated, a debate broke out
over whether publishing such results would aid terrorists.
There has been a lot of controversy
over whether it truly is a separate species or if it is some kind of abnormal modern
human, is that right?
I see that the question has arisen
over whether driverless vehicles must perform «merely as well as an average
human»...
And achieving any stabilization target —
whether 2 degrees C of warming or 450 ppm or 1,000 gigatons of carbon added to the atmosphere by
human activity — will require at least an 80 percent cut in emissions from peak levels by the end of this century and, ultimately, zero emissions
over the long term.
The findings fit into the ongoing debate
over whether tools mark the start of modern
human culture, or predate Homo.
Most agricultural robotic systems still require some form of
human management,
whether it involves watching
over a swarm of bots to ensure nothing goes haywire or turning a strawberry - picking robot around once it has reached the end of a row.
Instead of agonising
over whether machines can ever be conscious like
humans, he aims to demonstrate specific, limited examples of consciousness.
These early
humans have been classed as another species, H. antecessor, though arguments remain
over whether it is a really separate species to H. heidelbergensis.
«It's become a fight
over process and
whether one can extrapolate animal studies to
humans,» she says.
Studying the Austrian infants or any DNA extracted from them may contribute to the debate
over whether or not
humans and Neandertals exchanged DNA, Soffer says.
«While it is not clear
whether the Y6 receptor is fully active in
humans, Pancreatic Polypeptide is highly expressed — even more so than in mice — and it's possible that another receptor to which the peptide has high affinity, such as Y4, could have taken
over this function.»
Over the last decade, political scientists have debated
whether or not
human rights practices have been stagnating, as the uncorrected data seem to indicate.