Sentences with phrase «overall big effect on»

«Marginal cuts by the U.S. don't have a long - term overall big effect on the climate,» he said.

Not exact matches

Policy decisions by Saudi authorities, including which of Aramco's huge selection of assets will be included in the share sale, will have a big effect on the overall price and valuation.

Other big players like Ozil and Cazorla are perhaps easier to drop, but with his fitness levels and the overall effect he has on the Arsenal team, Alexis has made himself a must start.

Some other studies have also shown that probiotics don't have a big effect on the overall balance of bacteria in the intestines of healthy people.

Again, it's not as obvious as it would be on a Switch screen, but the characters are all made of incredibly low - poly models when compared to its Switch big brother, and then when you factor in muddier textures, less visual effects and a generally blurrier overall image, it's hard to take to this version after playing it on Switch.

But because school effects on average levels of achievement are smaller than the effects of families and communities, even if teachers were the largest school effect, they would not be a very big portion of the overall effect.

Reviewing your report properly could unearth many errors — big or small — and could have an effect on your overall credit score, which is why reviewing is so important.

For example, the unpredictable behaviour of a single (big) market participant can have dramatic effects on overall market behaviour.

Dead Rising 4: Frank's Big Package is so full, so brimming with features, and options, and add - ons, and DLC, and mini-games, and costumes, and weapons that the overall effect borderline overwhelming.

It seems that there's only ever a limited volume of such large projects considering crowdfunding, meaning there will be a visible effect on the overall performance for the video games category in crowdfunding in any given year based on the volume of these high performance projects — there will naturally be years where lower numbers of these big projects come to the platform due to factors such as the long development cycles.

THE BAD: The weaker points holding Accel World Vs Sword Art Online back are somewhat minor, but they have a big effect on the game's overall experience.

To point out just a couple of things: — oceans warming slower (or cooling slower) than lands on long - time trends is absolutely normal, because water is more difficult both to warm or to cool (I mean, we require both a bigger heat flow and more time); at the contrary, I see as a non-sense theory (made by some serrist, but don't know who) that oceans are storing up heat, and that suddenly they will release such heat as a positive feedback: or the water warms than no heat can be considered ad «stored» (we have no phase change inside oceans, so no latent heat) or oceans begin to release heat but in the same time they have to cool (because they are losing heat); so, I don't feel strange that in last years land temperatures for some series (NCDC and GISS) can be heating up while oceans are slightly cooling, but I feel strange that they are heating up so much to reverse global trend from slightly negative / stable to slightly positive; but, in the end, all this is not an evidence that lands» warming is led by UHI (but, this effect, I would not exclude it from having a small part in temperature trends for some regional area, but just small); both because, as writtend, it is normal to have waters warming slower than lands, and because lands» temperatures are often measured in a not so precise way (despite they continue to give us a global uncertainity in TT values which is barely the instrumental's one)-- but, to point out, HadCRU and MSU of last years (I mean always 2002 - 2006) follow much better waters» temperatures trend; — metropolis and larger cities temperature trends actually show an increase in UHI effect, but I think the sites are few, and the covered area is very small worldwide, so the global effect is very poor (but it still can be sensible for regional effects); but I would not run out a small warming trend for airport measurements due mainly to three things: increasing jet planes traffic, enlarging airports (then more buildings and more asphalt — if you follow motor sports, or simply live in a town / city, you will know how easy they get very warmer than air during day, and how much it can slow night - time cooling) and overall having airports nearer to cities (if not becoming an area inside the city after some decade of hurban growth, e.g. Milan - Linate); — I found no point about UHI in towns and villages; you will tell me they are not large cities; but, in comparison with 20-40-60 years ago when they were «countryside», many small towns and villages have become part of larger hurban areas (at least in Europe and Asia) so examining just larger cities would not be enough in my opinion to get a full view of UHI effect (still remembering that it has a small global effect: we can say many matters are due to UHI instead of GW, maybe even that a small part of measured GW is due to UHI, and that GW measurements are not so precise to make us able to make good analisyses and predictions, but not that GW is due to UHI).

Not only that, but if rising CO2 levels were responsible for the decline of sea ice and implied effects on polar bears since 1979 (when CO2 levels were around 340 ppm), why has spring ice extent been so variable since 1989 (when the first big decline occurred) but so little changed overall since then?

But it did not have as big an effect on the global climate overall.

I am aware of people making the argument that the big push by the nuclear industry for enormous government subsidies to find a massive expansion of nuclear power on the basis that nuclear power is «THE ANSWER» to global warming is a fraud that dishonestly and cynically takes advantage of growing concern about the very real problem of global warming, and I make that argument myself (because even a quite large expansion of nuclear electricity generation would have little effect on overall GHG emissions, at great cost, taking too long to achieve even that little effect, while misdirecting resources that could more effectively be applied elsewhere).

Despite all this, it's still not clear exactly how big of an effect the Echo line has on Amazon's overall business, especially considering the company doesn't post or break down revenue from its Echo unit.