In that case, the change in valuation will make a net positive contribution to the overall return, which could push the total return well above 5.95 %, particularly on shorter forecast horizons where the annualized effect of the contribution would be greate
In that case, the
change in valuation will make a net positive contribution to the overall return, which could push the total return well above 5.95 %, particularly on shorter forecast horizons where the annualized effect of the contribution would be greate
in valuation will make a net positive contribution to the
overall return, which could push the total return well above 5.95 %, particularly on shorter forecast horizons where the annualized effect of the contribution would be greater.
Thanks — put another way though — if you just buy a portfolio of say low EV / EBITDA (just as an example), and you basically run 100 % exposure on that approach — does history say
in expensive markets you plod on with the same or is there a demonstrable benefit
in changing exposure based on
overall market
valuation?