Sentences with phrase «overall effect of the intervention»

The unadjusted hazard ratios were 0.70 (95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.53 to 0.91) for a Mediterranean diet with extra-virgin olive oil and 0.70 (95 % CI, 0.53 to 0.94) for a Mediterranean diet with nuts (Figure 1) as compared with the control diet (P = 0.015, by the likelihood ratio test, for the overall effect of the intervention).

Recently, a narrative review and quantitative meta - analysis has been completed including 15 preventive interventions that included infant disorganized attachment as an outcome measure.9 Although the overall effect of all interventions combined was not significant, some interventions did succeed in preventing disorganized attachment in children.

A composite score of the 63 questionnaire items showed a significant positive overall effect of the intervention and both posttests.

The overall effect of the intervention on children's conduct problems was d = − 0.34 (95 % CI − 0.49 to − 0.19), indicating lower levels of conduct problems in children of families in the intervention condition relative to the control condition.

Not exact matches

In a systematic review of school - based interventions aimed at modifying knowledge, attitudes, social norms and intentions to breastfeed, researchers concluded that «Overall, these studies demonstrated positive effects on perceptions and attitudes toward breastfeeding and increased behavioral intention of breastfeeding later in life.

Results showed that the lifestyle intervention had no significant effect on healthy live birth rate and overall live birth rate in any of the six subgroups having fertility treatment.

Although the reporting of safety information was low overall, none of the clinical trials reported significant side effects due to the interventions.

Overall, one of the most impactful findings was that music interventions of all kinds resulted in a moderate - to - strong effect in reducing patients» anxiety.

A meta - analysis is the statistical process of combining the results of multiple trials, which gives researchers an overall effect for interventions.

This study — only the second overall assessment of diet and food on this disease — provides a very thorough evaluation of current scientific knowledge and makes a point of only reporting dietary interventions and specific foods that clearly show proven long - term effects.

Overall, studies in the field indicate that children from low - income families tend to show the most gains from social emotional learning interventions, but results for other groups of students are more mixed, although a number of studies show positive effects.

Promoting optimal mobility, physical activity and overall health and wellness; Preventing disease, injury, and disability; Managing acute and chronic conditions, activity limitations, and participation restrictions; Improving and maintaining optimal functional independence and physical performance; Rehabilitating injury and the effects of disease or disability with therapeutic exercise programs and other interventions; and Educating and planning maintenance and support programs to prevent re-occurrence, re-injury or functional decline.

The largest intervention study on a vegan diet that I know of showed better overall nutrient intake, but calcium was one nutrient that was very low Nutrient intake in the GEICO multicenter trial: the effects of a multicomponent worksite intervention.

Dr. Geoffrey Borman's recent meta - analysis of student achievement outcomes in 29 leading CSR models found that «the overall effects of CSR are significant, meaningful, and appear to be greater than the effects of other interventions that have been designed to serve similar purposes and student and school populations.»

One meta - analysis of an anger management intervention shows a positive effect on behaviour but an overall negative effect on learning.

For example, a 2002 systematic analysis by Dr. Geoffrey Borman and his colleagues of the student achievement outcomes of 29 leading K - 12 CSR models — most of which operated in Title 1 schools — reported that «the overall effects of CSR are significant, meaningful, and appear to be greater than the effects of other interventions that have been designed to serve similar purposes and student and school populations» (Borman, Hewes, Overman, & Brown, 2002, p. 33).

Increasingly, scholars recognize that early childhood interventions have a stronger effect on particular populations of children, thereby contributing not just to overall increases in achievement for all participating students, but providing particular boosts to children who need it most.

We would tentatively conclude that the long - term effects of investigations seem more promising than other interventions like leafleting and corporate outreach, but we put limited weight on this consideration in our overall understanding of how effective or ineffective any intervention is.

Attenuating these works with a barely perceptible ground tint, or even the simple intervention of the gallery adjusting the wall color to ensure that hisses of dissonance are muted, would serve their overall effect well.

The potential for specific climate - vulnerable communities to experience highly harmful health effects is not entirely clear in specific regions and on specific time frames due to uncertainties in rates of adaptation and uncertainties about the outcome of public health interventions currently being implemented that aim to address underlying health disparities and determinants of health.249 The public health community has not routinely conducted evaluations of the overall success of adaptation interventions or of particular elements of those interventions.

The quality of evidence for motor development and overall child development was moderate, and the majority of comparisons showed no intervention effect.

In the Infant Health and Development program, mothers in the intervention group engaged in higher - quality interactions with their infants, though the effects were small.82 In New Zealand, Early Start documented higher positive parenting attitudes, a greater prevalence of nonpunitive attitudes, and more favorable overall parenting scores for families in the treatment group.83 In Queensland, mothers in the intervention group were rated as significantly higher in emotional and verbal responsivity.84

For example, the overall group therapy versus control group effect size of 0.58 indicated that the average person attending a group was better off than 72 % of people who received no group intervention (e.g. remained on a waiting list).

However, for both child abuse and parent stress, the average effect sizes were not different from zero, suggesting a lack of evidence for effects in these areas.108 Earlier meta - analytic reviews have also noted the lack of sizable effects in preventing child maltreatment — again citing the different intensity of surveillance of families in the treatment versus control groups as an explanation (though the authors did report that home visiting was associated with an approximately 25 percent reduction in the rate of childhood injuries).109 Another review focusing on the quality of the home environment also found evidence for a significant overall effect of home - visiting programs.110 More recently, Harriet MacMillan and colleagues published a review of interventions to prevent child maltreatment, and identified the Nurse - Family Partnership and Early Start programs as the most effective with regard to preventing maltreatment and childhood injuries.

Overall high levels among intervention and comparison families of baseline practices to promote toddler development and safety likely contributed to lack of treatment effects in relation to injury prevention and parents» practices to promote development.

The overall aim of the study was to examine the effects of Music and Movement (M&M) in a two - by - two factorial model, comparing M&M with M&M combined with F2F, F2F alone and a no intervention control condition.

The pattern of results for predictors and moderators needs to be examined in the context of the overall study findings, which showed no overall difference between the minimal intervention bibliotherapy group and the therapist - led treatments, no differences in outcomes overall between the two types of therapists, nurses, and psychologists, and dose effects when parents attended a sufficient number of sessions, a number that exceeds the number of sessions that families often attend in clinic settings.

The estimated overall effect of curative interventions was also significant with a Cohen's d of 0.364; 95 % CI [0.227; 0.502] and was small in magnitude according to Cohen's criteria.

Next, we estimated an overall effect of only preventive interventions, and this yielded a Cohen's d of 0.263; 95 % CI [0.197; 0.329], which is a small effect according to the criteria of Cohen (1988).

As we identified seven outlying effect sizes (see above), we performed a sensitivity analysis in which we estimated an overall effect of child maltreatment interventions using the data in which the outlying effect sizes were excluded.

Overall, a small but significant effect was found of interventions aimed at preventing or reducing child maltreatment (d =.287), which is in line with findings of previously conducted meta - analyses on the effect of these interventions (e.g., Geeraerts et al. 2004; Filene et al. 2013; MacLeod and Nelson 2000).

In addition, we estimated the overall effect of child maltreatment interventions excluding the results of pilot / feasibility studies, because these studies are more likely to show an effect that is larger than effects produced by well - powered trials.