Not exact matches
Overall, the test
subjects viewed one another more negatively based
on what they saw in the video versus their in - person meeting.
When working with biographical material, the artist found the
overall subjects pressing and realised that some things are simply too important to only have a single mind's
view on it — hence resulting in a group exhibition.
It's you who is not reading, I didn't say that NASA article «falsify s» ACC, the topic is about this «loudness» you mentioned, what I said was that mainstream media «loudly» publicizes less definitive studies that suggest ice receding or sea level rise, but a more definitive study like that one (which used satelites) is not reported
on because it is inconvenient for their
overall simplistic
view on the
subject.
The varying
views on the
subject are worth seeing for an
overall perspective.