If one were to model the temperature rise in the years 1974 - 1999 it would be very easy to
overestimate aerosol cooling and so to overestimate the value of CO2 climate sensitivity.
Not exact matches
As already said, there are a lot of indications that GHG influences are
overestimated in current models (see discussion # 10 and # 11 of http://www.realclimate.org/index.php?p=22), not at least as the influence of sulphate
aerosols are not measurable where the largest
cooling according to the models should be seen.
The Echam4 model
overestimates temperatures with GHGs alone, and gives too much
cooling when including
aerosols.
Taking the
aerosol — or volcanic emanation, it doesn't matter which — as
cooling factor, means that CO2 forcing was
overestimated during the post 1975, pre-98 period, and
overestimated during the post-98 period.
... Schneider became aware that he had
overestimated the
cooling effect of
aerosols, and underestimated the warming effect of CO2 by a factor of about three.
Several studies suggest global dimming
aerosol cooling is not
overestimated, but underestimated.
Their model found that the unprecedented increase in monsoon activity over the past 30 years is «due possibly in part to» the rise of CO2 in the atmosphere, but they said the result could be an
overestimate because the authors didn't consider the impacts of
aerosols, which
cool the atmosphere.