Investments were handled by
the overly aggressive parent company Southmark, which gave little attention to risk.
Not exact matches
In the end, it all comes back to education: In the ideal world, a
parent's decision about whether to allow a child to start playing or continue playing collision sports before high school under current rules of play (which are evolving in the direction of safety, fortunately, as seen, for instance, in USA Hockey's ban on body checking at the Pee Wee hockey level and below, and limits on full - contact practices instituted at every level of football, from Pop Warner, to high school, college, and the NFL), will be a conscious one; a decision in which the risks of participating in a particular sport - provided it is based on the most up - to - date information about those risks and a consideration of other risk factors that might come into play for their child, such as pre-existing learning disabilities (e.g. ADHD), chronic health conditions (e.g., a history of history of multiple concussions or seizures, history of migraines), or a reckless and
overly aggressive style of play - are balanced against the benefits to the child of participating.
Getting along has different meanings for different
parents, but in general,
parents want their child to enjoy the company of other children, be liked by them, be well - behaved in their presence (for example, share and cooperate with them), and resist the influence of companions who are
overly boisterous,
aggressive or defiant of adult authority.
Overly harsh
parenting, for example, often leads to
aggressive behavior in children, leading children to join antisocial peer groups, further heightening their aggressiveness.
I have seen many
aggressive children who have
parents who are
overly controlling, restrictive and enforce too many rules.