Not exact matches
I'm more of a descriptivist, and I happen to believe that
overly - presciptive assertions about political taxonomy are invariably self - serving and unscientifically subjective (perhaps you might read Kahan about «liberal» vs «
conservative» w / r / t his world
view matrix).
But its forecasts were based on measurements from the two main west Antarctic glaciers — Thwaites and Pine Island — a sample that provides an
overly narrow and
conservative view of what is happening when compared with the new research.
I have not seen any suggestion that the existing committees have actually rated a candidate «unqualified» because of his or her
overly conservative social, political or legal
views.