Sentences with phrase «own animal kingdom»

To say that leadership and organizational behavior has been successful in the animal kingdom is a gross understatement.

This image from the animal kingdom adds some insight

Not unlike what happens to other creatures in the animal kingdom, when people feel like they're being hunted, they flee.

This is because large chunks of our genome perform similar functions across the animal kingdom.

That stems in part from the presence in our brains of a well - developed frontal lobe, an evolutionary advantage we hold over the rest of the animal kingdom.

The rest of the animal kingdom consists of «polyphasic» sleepers; they alternate sleep and wake cycles throughout a 24 - hour period.

While there's hardly any research yet on the hormone in human dads, findings elsewhere in the animal kingdom are strong and suggestive that it works in a similar way in people.

2) There are various patterns of symmetry throughout the animal kingdom.

The kingdom of God indeed looks like the animal kingdom.

If god, genesis and so on are correct, we shouldn't share ANY dna with anything else, because we were created completely separately from the rest of the animal kingdom.

I am but a faulted marmoset within the animal kingdom of godly creationism (s).

I can ramble off a few relatively intelligent animals: talking parrots and whales, along with video game playing chimps and apes, sign language talking apes, and animal kingdom is filled with paired species that can notice a mate, find food, build shelter, and other things.

ian... not sure which part you wanted me to reply on, but I will take issue with yr point about homosexuality being a threat to human existence.I'm no expert on the subject, but I think we cd safely assume that the phenomena has been with us since our ancestors came out of the trees... we're now over six billion and growing at an alarming rate.Not sure where you might find the data on this supposed threat to going forth and multiplying.BTW, I have read that homosexual behaviour is observable in the animal kingdom, but I wd need to do some work to reference a credible study.

The most obvious indicator for common descent in the animal kingdom is body plan.

We see it across the animal kingdom all animals discipline their young they have to if the animals are going to survive.

Gay couples all throughout the animal kingdom pair off for life and often raise abandoned kids.

The point is that evolution shows we have a common origin with the rest of the animal kingdom.

@russ: one major flaw in your logic... a person has to believe what you do to think something natural to most creatures in the animal kingdom is a sin.

We can look around the animal kingdom and see where much of our humanity evolved from... still no sign of any «gods».

Stepping on others to bring oneself up is innate in the animal kingdom.

God must be using the hero's family just to save the animal kingdom and then mankind will die out.

By examining the animal kingdom, we see the same behaviors we see in ourselves.

The fifth and sixth days take away any associations with divinity from the animal kingdom.

For those of us who are comfortable with a theory of evolution that acknowledges the common origin of the human and animal kingdoms, the scientific evidence that corroborates this syndrome of dominance in the mythic Genesis accounts is of special interest.

the evolutionary progression of the eye can be seen clearly in the abundant versions the eye in throughout the animal kingdom.

It appears that morality may not the the purview of humanity but is found in much of the animal kingdom.

And don't claim aything about this «humans as the higher standard, rule over the animal kingdom» B.S. People kill much more indescriminently than any animal ever did.

The Hebrew - Christian view that man is formed in the image of God and has a basic uniqueness in the animal kingdom is, therefore, much needed in our situation.

Look to the animal kingdom... they do not worship gods, they do not get married (although many species do mate for life) and yet they thrive.

Humans clearly are set apart the rest of the animal kingdom if for nothing else due to the complexity of the human brain.

I am proud to be a member of the animal kingdom and nature.

@ket: the diversity we see in the animal kingdom, is a direct result of the enviroment.

In the animal kingdom - and we are very much animals, albeit with a greater intelligence - it is survival of the fittest.

I'm assuming he / she means the rest of the animal kingdom.

ahh but it happens in the animal kingdom — They eat their feces and eat their young as well

A possible real connection with the animal kingdom is itself of relatively little theological importance, for anything in it that would be important for the theological interpretation of human life in the present, can also be known without it, that is to say, the vulnerability of man in face of the powers of this earth, man's temptation to see himself from the point of view of his animality, his liability to death, man's dynamic orientation and task of developing to his perfection from below upwards, beyond his beginnings.

He then went on to tell us about the history of the universe from the huge explosion of matter and energy (the Big Bang) through the formation of stars and then rocky planets on which complex chemicals were produced, leading to the synthesis of the first molecules of life and the emergence of the plant and animal kingdoms.

In Genesis we're given responsibility for the earth and the animal kingdom; there is no indication we need to lord it over one another.

There are many things in the animal kingdom, including humans, Douglas, where things don't appear to make biological sense, and yet they just «are».

Whether and how far these reflections concerning a positive relation between spirit and matter may be significant when it is a question of asking in philosophical and theological terms whether an ontological connection between man and the animal kingdom asserted by the natural sciences to be a fact, is open to an explanatory interpretation on the basis of the nature of spirit and matter, can only be judged after we have examined some aspects of «becoming» in general.

The term moderate evolution might therefore be applied to a theory which simply inquires into the biological reality of man in accordance with the formal object of the biological sciences as defined by their methods and which affirms a real genetic connection between that human biological reality and the animal kingdom, but which also in accordance with the fundamental methodological principles of those sciences, can not and does not attempt to assert that it has made a statement adequate to the whole reality of man and to the origin of this whole reality.

There are, of course, questions which are prior in principle to the empirical sciences and which are presupposed to an objective and adequate statement of the problems of a possible real connection between man and the animal kingdom.

It reminds me of Descartes and his view of the animal kingdom as automata, a term that has often been misconstrued.

Each of us is a sexual creature like others in the animal kingdom, although our human sexuality is also different from that which we observe in that kingdom.

when it seems that the animal kingdom is marked by shocking cruelty and suffering.

If this is God's ideal plan for the animal kingdom, it doesn't make sense for the Book of Genesis to allow for the existence of carnivorous beasts, violence and death before the Fall.

Also, throughout nature, fully 8 % of the animal kingdom is * exclusively * same - sex oriented, including examples among male bighorn sheep, black swans, lions, giraffes, and hundreds of species.

It is difficult to know where in the animal kingdom one has the need to postulate «self - consciousness,» «self - awareness» or, to use Eccles» phrase, «the experiencing self.»

But, he says: «The emergence of consciousness in the animal kingdom is perhaps as great a mystery as the origin of life itself» He will, however, agree that there can be little doubt that consciousness in animals has some function and can be looked at as if it were a bodily organ.

This tenacity continues through all the enormous effusion of the animal kingdom, and bursts into the light of day with the appearance, in thinking Man, of the formidable power of pre-vision.