again, something directly contrary to your own
earlier arguments about relevance.
One of
the earliest arguments was biblical.
But, in accordance with
our earlier argument, he must not do this in such a way that the operation of absolute Being in providing a ground of the new and increasing reality is inserted side by side with the causal efficacy of the finite cause as though fundamentally it were itself a part cause.
Really, if you go back and look at it, many of
these early arguments were primarily about power and control, but we'll leave that alone for now...
Earlier arguments had presumed that carrying Christianity to the Third World was a good thing not only spiritually but culturally as well.
This manifesto continues
earlier arguments that the EU helps to defend the UK against «global challenges» including climate change, security threats, cross border crime and terrorism.
Early arguments over new curtains and passing the salt play as tight subtext here and are paid off in a quiet «I missed you today, honey,» and «I missed you, too.»
Apparently, they were continuing
an earlier argument.
I revert back to
my earlier argument that Thieves in Time is a throwback to a bygone era, unfortunately the game has some of its principles firmly set on sticking to the past.
> Chapter Five, «Reconstructing the Precautionary [* 638] Principle — and Managing Fear,» emphasizes the importance of identifying the «full universe of relevant risks» (p. 122), although, of course, this notion is in tension with
his earlier argument that everyone is subject to the biases revealed by cognitive psychology.
This piece expands on
my earlier argument that the US has no national interest at stake in the Middle East, just a set of mutually inconsistent sectional interests and policy agendas.
Though the extensive roof damage had been an important theme in his earlier controversy, Higgins did not walk back
his earlier arguments.
No doubt the timing of the elections played a role in scheduling
an early argument.
Not exact matches
Standing before two dozen hospital staff, he circles back to the
argument he deployed
earlier in the day, that «if the Senate did change, we could at least confront the President with some difficult choices.»
Earlier this year, Wall Street Journal editor Gerard Baker made a similar
argument, saying the word lie «implies much more than just saying something that's false.
During his
earlier visits to factories in Saguenay, Que., and Hamilton, Trudeau said the national security
argument the U.S. has made when it comes to considering tariffs makes no sense and could not apply to Canada.
The shale revolution weakened a strong and intuitive
argument in favour of the Keystone, namely that the pipeline would serve to transport much needed fuel to be used domestically in the U.S. And Prime Minister Stephen Harper's pledge to turn to China after Washington's temporary rejection of the Keystone in
early 2012, hasn't amounted to much so far.
During his
earlier visits to factories in Saguenay, Que., and Hamilton, Trudeau repeated his message that the national security
argument the U.S. has made when it comes to tariffs makes no sense and could not apply to Canada.
Dan Chen, head of Roche / Genentech's cancer immunotherapy unit, told Fortune the data were particularly promising since they could lead to Tecentriq becoming a first response treatment and give additional credence to the company's
argument that immunotherapies are more effective the
earlier they're given to patients.
Various studies at the time suspected sugar was bad for the heart, and the latest JAMA suggests the Foundation paid the researchers to counter those
arguments and «downplay
early warning signs that sucrose consumption was a risk factor in [coronary heart disease].»
Fed vice-chairman Stanley Fischer explained the
arguments for and against an
early increase in US interest rates, Spanish economy minister Luis de Guindos said.
«The US government acted as police force (identifying the foreign government's crime), prosecutor (making the legal
arguments), jury (ruling on the evidence), and judge (sentencing the foreigner to US retaliatory punishment),» Chad Bown, a senior fellow at the pro-free trade Peterson Institute for International Economics, wrote in a memo about Section 301's history
earlier in August.
Earlier this month in his outlook for September, the head of the world's largest bond shop employed the Lindy dance craze, former Citigroup CEO Chuck Prince, the Wimpy cartoon character and his «dying cult of equity»
argument in a mash - up of prose to describe the «age of inflation that is upon us,» which he claims typically «provides a headwind, not a tailwind, to securities prices in both stocks and bonds.»
With their large populations and rapid growth, these countries, so the
argument goes, will soon become some of the largest economies in the world — and, in the case of China, the largest of all by as
early as 2020.
First, the Bank of Canada convinces the Department of Finance and the Conservatives that it «needs» expanded powers to purchase a broader range of securities (see my
earlier post for why their
arguments are not very convincing).
If you restate his
argument in an uncharitable way, he is saying that the solution for the problem of excluding non-accredited investors in value appreciation is not to let them participate in private markets, but instead to suffer them to populate an
earlier public market for private investors seeking liquidity.
[20] In essence, this was an
early version of the conflict of interest
argument made below: promoters were using nonvoting common stock as a way of maintaining voting control for themselves.
Aaron Wright of Cardozo Law School, for example, has made a detailed case arguing that the SAFT is itself a security, from contract to token, an
argument that looked prescient when
earlier this year rumors began to swirl that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) was going after lots of initial coin offering (ICO) projects.
My
argument is that China's growth model, which is not at all unique and for which there are many historical precedents, is usually wealth enhancing in its
early stages, and then becomes wealth destroying once capital is systematically misallocated.
I always answer that
argument the same way I answered yours... OF COURSE people who get in
early make the most money.
With mortgage rates still at historic lows, as well as mortgage interest tax deductions, there can be a good
argument against paying off your mortgage
early.
These and other trends seem to make a good
argument for buying a home in California
earlier in 2018, rather than later.
With the unemployment rate down to five percent and the Fed embarked on a tightening cycle, the
argument runs, indicators will start returning to
earlier, higher growth trends.
During closing
arguments in the trial
earlier this week, Leon asked the Justice Department's lead attorney, Craig Conrath, whether the imposition of a remedy would mean that the court was recognizing that there is anticompetitive harm.
Here, Hemel and Rozema's
argument brings to mind
earlier work by Lily Batchelder and others on the use of refundable credits versus non-refundable credits or deductions.
The correct
argument is that the damage in the form of misdirected investment and resource wastage was done by the
earlier quantitative easing (QE) programs and this damage can not be undone or even mitigated by deflating the money supply.
As Politico reports, Trump rejected Cohn's
arguments that tariffs would produce more job losses than gains during an Oval Office meeting
earlier in the year.
It pains me a bit to say it, because I was a shareholder in Core Labs in the
early 2010's — I talked to David Demshur before and he was a great guy, and I really believed in the bull
argument for this stock — but I do happen to agree with Einhorn after reading through his presentation.
At a recent Bloomberg conference, he got into a heated
argument with
early Facebook executive and venture capitalist, Chamath Palihapitiya over the city's housing crisis.
In this special series of Intelligence Memos we present the opposing
arguments made at the C.D. Howe Institute's inaugural Regent Debate
earlier this month.
Paul is the
earliest writer (55AD approx) but he never met Jesus and was unspecific (some would argue the Jewish Christians and Paul were incompatible but the latter won the
argument which is ironic as the former actualyl knew jesus).
At least you effectively invalidate your own
argument early on by pointing out that it's based entirely on anecdote, and clearly anecdote informed through bias.
(If that sounds familiar, it's because the same
argument was made twenty - five years ago in the
early stages of the battle over legalized abortion.)
= > nonsense
argument as I pointed out
earlier.
@ Steven: the same sorts of
arguments were made about the inherent goodness of man in the late 19th &
early 20th century.
She uses as bases of her
arguments the philosophies of «
early Christians,» which I feel bears no weight as they were not the prophets who understood and wrote the holy scripture.
«The
argument against the authenticity of 2 Peter turns on three main problems: (1) problem of external attestation in the
early church; (2) stylistic and literary problems with 1 Peter and Jude; and (3) historical and doctrinal problems that seem to indicate internal inconsistency and a late date.
Although the various scriptural
arguments for the resurrection of Jesus are open to question, modern writers insist that some explanation is needed of what empowered the
early disciples to spread the message of Jesus across the world.
Fundamentally this is a simple restatement of the
argument in the
earlier book.
I haven't heard that
argument used for movies since the
early days of pornography when hard - core pictures were preceded by a warning from a man wearing a doctor's smock about the terrible things viewers were about to witness.