Sentences with phrase «own eternal security»

I do believe in eternal security, so I would say that although we are citizens of the Kingdom of God through faith in Jesus, we can still live according to some of the rules (and consequences) of the Kingdom of Darkness.
We can hold to eternal security while still affirming that most verses that talk about «salvation» affirm a conditional deliverance from some sort of temporal and physical calamity.
When you are offered the choice of either being Arminian (Lose your salvation) or Calvinist (Sovereignty of God and Eternal Security) it is a no - brainer.
For some people, when they hear the phrase, «eternal security» their blood starts to boil and they have trouble keeping their tongue from shouting, «Heresy!»
But a strong, Biblical understanding of God's grace, a grace that gives us everything for free, a grace that is not earned, not worked for, and can not be lost or destroyed, a grace that covers over all our sins, this kind of grace leads to one thing — eternal security.
Eternal security tells me that God loves me unconditionally, and therefore, I can move forward in my Christian life at breakneck speed.
Quite the contrary, I am convinced that when Scripture is studied in its various contexts, eternal security is the clear teaching of the Bible.
One of the basic things we must understand is that eternal security does not depend on us, but on God.
Read my responses to Craig above and I hope you will at least caution yourself and others to not place blind faith in the doctrine of eternal security.
I do not believe in Once Saved, Always Saved, but I do believe in eternal security.
And I don't think they disprove eternal security.
They believe in eternal security because it is comforting to them.
Donald Cole, who used to host the Open Line Bible Answer Call in Radio Show says that without fail, he receives at least one, sometimes as many as five questions about eternal security during every single show.
Which brings us to the third reason I believe in Eternal Security.
Many don't really care what kind of preaching a pastor does, they only care whether he teaches eternal security or not.
When you emphasize grace and eternal security, those are the questions and accusations you receive.
He also responded to the common objections about eternal security.
I believe the Bible teaches eternal security.
The foundation of eternal security is an understanding of the matchless grace of God.
God is Uncategorized Bible & Theology Topics: Acts 16:31, eternal life, eternal security, everlasting life, rewards, salvation, saved, Theology of Salvation
excellent defense on eternal security.
And it is my conviction, it is my observation that those who believe in eternal security move a lot faster down the road of discipleship than those who are constantly afraid of making mistakes.
God is Redeeming Theology Bible & Theology Topics: eternal security, everlasting life, glorification, gospel, justification, Romans 8:29 - 39
Music styles might possibly be in first place, but if so, the issue of eternal security is not far behind.
In this message, I just want to introduce you to the position I hold on eternal security and why I hold it.
When we do not believe in eternal security, you can never be certain that at that moment, God loves you.
This brings us to my fourth conviction about eternal security.
Those who reject eternal security say that it is everlasting as long as we obey.
While I believe in eternal security, I still get the question, «What about someone who grew up a Christian, lived as a Christian for years, then quit, denounced Christ, and hasn't followed him since?»
We must not make a decision based on a worry that people will live in sin if eternal security is true.
The only thing they care about is whether the church teaches eternal security or not.
In other words, a lack of eternal security leads to legalism.
You see, this person doesn't believe in eternal security because certain people who claim to be Christians certainly don't act like Christians.
Because of all of this, it has been argued, and I would agree, that the issue of eternal security may well be the most hotly debated and theologically divisive issue in the church today.
Now at some time in the eternal security debate, after all this talk about grace, someone says something like, «I think you're taking this grace thing a little bit too far.
The logical extension of eternal security is that people who give themselves over to evil must be accepted into heaven.
Do you believe in eternal security?
You claim that those who reject eternal security believe that only sins committed prior to receiving Jesus are forgiven but you also go on to warn that we better be careful or else the next time we sin, Jesus will take eternal life away from us.
Only genuine eternal security results in Romans 6:1 questions.
After I tell some Christians that I believe that God foreknows those whom He can convince / persuade to make a free will decision to accept Christ as their savior and that I believe in eternal security of the believer, they say that God can only eternally secure a believer if God removes the person's free will capacity to accept or reject Christ after the person accepts Christ as his savior.
Paul's magnum opus on the gospel, his letter to the Romans, has numerous clear statements about eternal security.
eternal security, women ministers, etc.).
Note as well that the items which Paul mentions in this eternal security chain are all God's parts in eternal life.
Moreover, faith is not the «onramp to this eternal security chain» as this article erroneously states.
They are far too late to the party to play the role of an onramp to the chain of eternal security given that foreknowledge and predestination long precede it, being before the foundation of the world.
The first part, found in Romans 8:29 - 30, contains the eternal security chain.
Eternal security (the belief that a person can not lose his or her salvation) is rejected, since Mormon salvation is based in large part on acts of obedience after an initial faith experience.
Some of you will hit me with a bunch of scripture later about apostasy and scripture that is against eternal security.
However, my view regarding eternal security, would be yes and no.
So the «need» for eternal security was there.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z