Sentences with phrase «own eye witness»

They are eye witness reports of Jesus and his ministry.

The eye witnesses are labeled insane, liars, or dreamers, and the accounts are tossed before consideration.

'' science shuts down, they don't give God the benefit of the doubt when considering eye witness accounts.»

Tom, eye witness accounts are often taken seriously by science.

There are no first hand eye witness accounts of jesus.

Wouldn't the eye witnesses know more?

Not only are there a lot of eye witness accounts of Zeus coming down from Olympus and talking to people, I personally have spoken with Zeus himself.

Fiction never is evidence of anything... that's why they call it fiction... this so called Jesus was fiction... no empirical or any eye witnesses... nothing....

I wonder how 11 eye witnesses would be received in a court of law today?

Your «testimony of eye witnesses» that you always speak of came 40 — 75 + years after the events were supposed to have taken place and it's your cult members who write it that way in an attempt at credibility.

That said, there are eye witnesses that went to their deaths saying that they saw Jesus die on a cross, and saw him again days later alive, then later still saw him raise up into heaven, all the while proclaiming he is the Son of God sent to do that for others sins so they could be saved.

A&A, like I said, the bible is filled with eye witness accounts where they described the evidence.

All of it tainted by years of myth building, notorious unreliability of eye witness testimony, agendas of the writers, subsequent editing, etc..

@ John — and Lord of the rings is filled with eye witness and first person accounts of people who knew Sauron, and Galdalf et al..

You have eye witness accounts in the bible, you have present day people telling you he's there, knowing he's there, not belief, knowing, you have vast supernatural events like the big bang that happened once and never again, you have life starting up, species forming, male and female that have to be there for offspring, and lo and behold... you deny all of them because God being there, isn't what you wanted.

It does not require people to be experts at such, but it does show that not everyone had to be an expert, or an eye witness to have faith that it's true.

None were eye witness accounts.

You represent the TYPICAL christian... can not comprehend what was originally said and have serious serious trouble connecting the dots and serious trouble discerning between what is evidenced and what is been rewritten a hundred times copied in differnt languages... originally written in greek... which wasn't the language of jesus but somehow the scribes met every eye witness and wrote all of it down... actually there are NO eye witness accounts in the bible so how is it that people get conned into believing this?

They were all eye witness accounts as well, but you selectively pick and choose which ones to believe and which ones to ignore.

You do realize there are eye witness accounts of all the greek and egyptian gods as well right?

LOL at eye witness accounts.

When it comes to your supernatural claims, there are no first hand eye witness accounts of your claims.

How do you know that those Egyptian myths weren't written by eye witness to become the world of Horus?

Eye witness accounts are the flimsiest bit of evidence and it's telling that apparently the only eye witnesses were other devout folks who would be gullible enough to believe it.

All the evidence you have given so far is in no way verifiable and relies solely on eye witnesses, which is the worst sort of evidence you could ever hope to use.

All this happened during the life of the eye witnesses of Jesus» ministry.

In comparison to the New Testament where Paul's letters were written starting 15 years after Jesus» ascension, the first gospel, Mark written 25 years after (Peter was the source of Mark), Matthew who was an eye witness at 35 years, and Luke 35 years as a careful Roman / Greek trained historian who interviewed living eye witnesses such as Mary, mother of Jesus.

Even the people examining this fragment admit that # 1, it's from the fourth century, hardly eye witness material.

steelerguin, «Snowboarder, the gospel of John is recognized as being written by an eye witness of Jesus.»

Heck I'm not within 20 generations of an eye witness.

Yet, these same people who denounce any notion of creationism will also sooner slit their own throats than investigate their brethren's eye witness accounts of the afterlife.

I would call that sketchy hearsay at best... not «eye witness» evidence.

During my visit to Punnappra, an eye witness of the incident told me that twenty nine natives of Punnappra were killed.

@ lawrence «eye witness accounts are all that we have...» Except for testable, repeatable, demonstrable, tangible, empirical data.

Topher, don't forget about all of the «eye witnesses» that have been abducted by aliens and had their butts probed.

That is why defense lawyers rely heavily on DNA evidence rather than eye witnesses in major cases.

So there is no «eye witness» accounts.

But our faith is based on the report of eye witnesses that were cross examined in their time and not found to be fraudulent.

Luke, there tends to only be eye witness accounts when it comes to history.

Final Authority = B I B L E! One needs to see the 4 Gospels as the sworn affidavits of eye witnesses.

Even today, eye witness accounts of crime are very weak arguments in a court of law.

Read the New Testament written by 4 EYE WITNESSES who worked with Jesus for the 3 years before He died.

What we have to rely on in the modern world besides unreliable eye witness evidence is forensics and DNA.

It's closer to the fact and the accounts were received from eye witness accounts.

If you don't believe in eye witnesses, feel free to not believe in numerous events throughout history.

Were they standing or sitting when the «eye witnesses» saw came upon them?

For eye witness accounts are all that we have...

If you look at the resurrection there are only close associates as supposed «eye witnesses,» unless you count the highly supicious 500 people that Paul, at least I think it was Paul, talks about several years, if not decades later.

DNA has cleared many wrongfully convicted victims of your so called eye witness testimony.

Many people question the authenticity of the authorship of the Gospels and can not understand how they claim to be eye witness accounts of events that were not written until years after the events actually happened.