Sentences with phrase «own high animal»

My point was that they may not be denied those rights even if, in some respects, they may not seem as developed as some of the higher animals, because rights belong to the whole human species, and thus to all its members.

He has made a graveyard of the globe in trying his honest best to smooth his brother's path to happiness and heaven... The higher animals have no religion.

Thus, at the lowest level, electrons tend to unite and converge in the atom; atoms converge by molecularization, crystallization; molecules unite by polymerization; cells unite by conjugation, reproduction, association; nerve ganglions concentrate and localize to form a brain by what might be called a process of cephalization; the higher animal groups form colonies, hives, herds, societies, etc.; man socializes and forms civilizations as foci of attraction and organization.

Regarding the latter, classical theologians typically limit self - determining (free) creatures on this earth to humans (Or perhaps also to certain higher animals), 1 while process theologians typically would affirm that creative self - determination is characteristic of all beings.

Classical theologians typically limit self - determining (free) creatures on this earth to humans (or perhaps also to certain higher animals), while process theologians typically would affirm that creative self - determination is characteristic of all beings.

(I interpret «life and death» here to refer to the impermanence spoken of above, also to the fragmentation of values as scattered about, a little in me, some in you, some in other higher animals, indeed as Buddhists assert some even in lower animals, all of these perishable.)

We can not, it seems destroy our solar system but we can this planet and its surface as livable for high animal life; however, the galaxy and the island universes are remarkably safe from our interference.

Nevertheless, I would like to raise the question whether Whitehead is not after all guilty of emphasizing and generalizing some factor that may indeed be peculiar to man and the higher animals, at the expense of another factor which could offer more genuine grounds for generalization.

Whitehead attributes morality to the higher animals, in addition to their enjoyment of form.

The higher animals have learned to interpret these sense - qualities, thus perceived, as symbols of the actualities in the external world — actualities which are themselves perceived only by vague feelings of their causal agency.

However, at least in the higher animals, such responses can be overcome by association of other entities with the signal.

In the case of the higher animals, this service requires a considerable activity on its part, both conscious and unconscious.

However, the lowliest worms have sense organs, nerve cells and nerve centers, and these cells function more or less in the same manner as those of higher animals.

But these conclusions are very cogent in higher animals.

Though their level of sentience is much lower than that of higher animals, this does not preclude their having some degree of feeling, willing, and mentality.

At best Braine shows thathuman beings have an existence that transcends the body because they have language, but he does not show how or why only human beings and not other higher animals possess transcendence when they are all alike psycho - physical beings, because animals are not to be explained mechanistically either.

Thus far, although the human soul has been the prime example, all that has been said may apply also to the souls of the higher animals.

It can also leave us hostages to fortune as new discoveries reveal amazing abilities in higher animals.

There is every reason to suppose that the higher animals have similar immediate enjoyment of themselves as centers of experience.

But even here he hedges, for he believes that something like morality can also be observed among the higher animals.

In contrast to some Christian views of the soul, it should also be noted at the outset that Whitehead's understanding of the soul applies to the higher animals as well as to man.

In the case of humans, and presumably of the higher animals as well, these dominant occasions are so ordered as to constitute enduring objects.

This spontaneity may be minimal for protons and electrons, but in the course of the evolutionary advance, sustained until now, it has manifested itself in ever richer forms as the vitality of living cells, the conscious activity of the higher animals, and the self - conscious freedom of man.

The basic facts, which I mentioned, are also experienced by higher animals.

Whitehead underscored this continuity by including «higher animals» in his definition of «living person.»

He notes that in the higher animals genetic evolution of social behaviour will be a key factor.

Our species is like the other higher animals, apes and whales especially, except for this linguistic capacity and the ability to use symbols to a degree vastly beyond the capacity of other planetary animals.

It also has led to outright inconsistency: «A scientific realism, based on mechanism, is conjoined with an unwavering belief in the world of men and of the higher animals as being composed of self - determining organisms» (SMW 110).

Examples are photons, electrons, protons, atoms, molecules, and psyches of human beings and other higher animals (AI 238; SMW 161f.

The difference is that in man and the higher animals there is a unique coordination of many such occasions over a particular area called the body, and a unique inheritance of past occasions that is able consciously to identify a self through history.

Some use of subjective terms may be warranted in describing the behavior of human beings and perhaps of higher animals to avoid ponderous circumlocutions, but should be avoided in attempts at the most precise formulations.

Higher animals all seem to contain at least one such society, called a «living person,» present in the body in addition to the cells and molecules of the central nervous system, even though dependent upon them.

There are many factors present in the perception of a situation by a human being that can not be attributed even to the higher animals.

In this regard, we described two types of biologically - based teleologies: (i) an external teleology, where there is a deliberate and conscious setting of goals, those that are generally found among human beings and possibly in higher animals; and (ii) an internal teleology, where there is no self - directed or conscious goal - seeking on the part of living organisms, such as in the natural selection of favorable traits among biologically adaptive species.

Sense experience and thought and consciousness generally are precisely what can not be generalized beyond the higher animals.

For example, if the individual whose feelings are being inferred is a person, or even a higher animal, we can potentially confirm empathic judgments by looking at neurophysiological data.

Donald R. Griffin (1976, 1984) argues it is high time students of behavior relaxed their behaviorist stance and led the way to an experimental science dealing with the mental expression of animals, and not just of higher animals.

In 1871 Charles Darwin wrote: «The difference in mind between man and the higher animals, great as it is, certainly is one of degree and not of kind».

There are no good grounds for drawing a hard and fast line between the higher animals and us.

Choosing organic means you are opting for products that have been produced to a high animal welfare and environmental standard.

High animal protein consumption also causes more metabolic acid, which can leach calcium from bones (think high rates of osteoporosis).

«The consumer continues to expect antibiotic and hormone - free meat raised with plenty of room and high animal welfare standards,» he says.

Organic production is an overall system of farm management and food production that combines best environmental practices, a high level of biodiversity, the preservation of natural resources, the application of high animal welfare standards and a production method in line with the preference of certain consumers for products produced using natural substances and processes.

There are plenty of reasons to choose organic, it's better for the environment, the animals are reared using higher animal welfare standards and of course organic produce has lower pesticide residues and is GM free.

In response, the UK Department for International Trade (DIT) reaffirmed its commitment to a symbiotic trade agreement with Australia, with a spokesperson commenting: «This government has been very clear that the UK will maintain its own high animal welfare and environmental standards in future free trade agreements.

I bought the local, pastured (pasture - raised) chicken pictured above with a high animal welfare rating for $ 2.99 / lb at a nearby health food store.

Nearly three in 10 (28 %) say they would pay more for products supporting British farmers, while just under a fifth say they would pay more for an organic product (19 %) and the same proportion would pay more for a product that guaranteed higher animal welfare (19 %).

When you choose Organic you are guaranteed Free Range, plus the added benefits of «Certified Organic», which stipulates very high animal welfare conditions.

At Hormel Foods, quality assurance and operations personnel perform daily internal audits in our processing facilities to maintain the highest animal care practices.

High beverage sugar as well as high animal protein intake at infancy may increase overweight risk at 8 years: a prospective longitudinal pilot study