Google has never shown much interest in government contracting, and spying on
individuals runs counter to its business model.
A Ponzi scheme is a fraudulent investment operation that pays returns to its investors from their own money, or the money paid by subsequent investors, instead of from profit earned by
the individuals running the business.
The point is that any club that is unhealthily identified with one
individual runs the danger of becoming complacent and sclerotic... That has been true of us for five years with predictable results...
he earns 8million pounds a year to play fifa with arsenal interactively, I take that back I think u can actually get fired when underperforming in fifa, so arsene is basically playing sims with millions of pounds, I salute arsene, how does
an individual run a billion dollar empire so unbelievably poorly without anyone 2 answer
be dented if we see certain
individuals run a mock today.
This would therefore appear to include genuine commercial losses made by a self - employed
individual running an unincorporated business.
The final state thus reached yields information about a large statistical ensemble of runs but does not describe
individual runs of the measurement.
In a paper published in Annals of Physics in January, the researchers propose two main ingredients that are sufficient to account for all properties of quantum measurements, including the uniqueness of the outcome of
each individual run.
Each individual run was started with miniscule variations in air temperature.
While the commission's report, released in December 2010, provides key recommendations for the oversight of synthetic biology that have led to actual regulations, it has little to say about the do - it - yourself biology (DIYbio) movement — the practice of self - taught or informally trained
individuals running experiments in makeshift laboratories.
For the study, 10
individuals ran and walked at different speeds on a uniquely designed treadmill; several cameras captured their gait with monitoring reflective markers placed on different parts of the individuals» lower limbs as the treadmill collected data from the applied force.
But a vegetarian diet must be followed correctly or else
the individual runs the risk of gaining weight if all they are doing is eating pasta, cheese and potato chips.
NYC About Blog A blog by Salvador Briggman that helps
individuals run successful crowdfunding campaigns.
Make a sound, and
individuals run the risk of being discovered.
Individual running business using internet can use this presentation in presenting his own web site and features of his business.
And
both individuals running are deeply unpopular so to draw any conclusion from this is absurd.
It was adequate but didn't allow for any personal interaction with
the individual running the campaign.
For
any individual running a small business, quarterly tax time is approaching and it's time to look at the year and assess what you've earned.
However, if volatility — good or bad — has
an individual running for the antacids, then it's generally a good sign that individual shouldn't be invested in capital markets at all.
Goodwin also cited the cost of rehabilitating the Vick dogs — more than $ 1 million — and noted most are still in
individual runs in shelters and not in homes.Â
While your dog is staying with us, they will be comfortable in our large
individual runs and walked at least twice daily.
We just have to reform those who are truly at fault: the 3,000 irresponsible shelter directors who kill when they don't have to and the four
individuals running the national organizations which defend and protect them: Ingrid Newkirk of PETA, Wayne Pacelle of HSUS, Matt Bershadker of the ASPCA and Robin Ganzert of the American Humane Association.
Speedrunning categories help specify rules for
individual runs but those rules are often subject to debate and interpretation as new glitches and techniques are found.
While the report guys from a single
individual running on a GTX980, it's interesting to see that AMD has already released an update driver to increase Quantum Break's performance on the R9 Fury X.
These are presumably the worst
individual runs, and they do indeed match PIOMAS extent / volume up to 2006, though not beyond.
Individual runs are vastly different, which does not make much sense if they are so well programmed.
Now, Model - E has a little trouble reproducing the exact character of the 1940 - 1975 period, but
some individual runs are uncannily close.
You have to remember that the 5 year forecast is derived from a large number of
individual runs each with slightly different starting conditions matching the range of the observational uncertainty in the real starting conditions.
As Pekka observed, you are confusing the multi-model mean with
individual runs exhibiting lots of variability (aka natural variability) and a slowly increasing anthropogenic signal.
All that is shown for AR4 are 2035 uncertainty ranges for three AR4 scenarios (including A1B) in the right margin, plus a spaghetti of
individual runs (a spaghetti that does not correspond to any actual AR4 graphic.)
the individual runs of each model are modeling different futures.
They actually regressed
individual run values and then took the ensemble mean of the regression slopes.
(I'm sure that there's a climate model run in the CMIP 5 ensemble that is pretty close to the real world history, but I've never seen
individual runs broken out separately.)
Now, the average does better than any of
the individual runs... but what does that mean?
Gavin Schmidt is right to argue that it would be better to use GCM ensembles than
individual runs when comparing predictions to observations.
the real question is do any of
the individual RUNS demonstrate these cycles.
The individual runs of the model are produced by slightly changing the initial conditions of several parameters.
I do nt suggest they do, but the way to determine that is to look at
individual runs.
Table does not give trends of
individual runs, just the average and standard deviation.
Sure, and if they had just put an ensemble you'd probably be complaining they hadn't shown all
the individual runs.
Land Use has slope values for the 5 runs that vary greatly and the CIs for
those individual runs are large but show that Run1 is very significantly different than the other runs.
My results shown in the table in the first link below agree well with those in Marvel using the run averages, but
the individual runs in my decadal analysis are similar to those were I used yearly regression and show large trend differences with some forcing categories having very wide CI ranges.
At a minimum, there should be an established protocol for discarding
individual runs, one established before they are generated; these discarded runs should be included for examination, and the reasons for their removal from the set before further analysis should be discussed.
All six
individual runs with bias - adjusted SST (only the average is shown) give simulated land air temperatures close to those observed so that internal model variability is small on decadal time - scales compared to the signal being sought.
(Note that even though he has calculated the results using
individual run, he has not reported them in his papers which only include the ensemble mean results and where he bizarrely claims they have the same spatial characteristics as individual runs — they do not).
On further reflection I believe that in principle it doesn't matter how you measure uncertainty (I guess this is what you called bias for
individual runs), especially if the aforementioned kind of baseline is unknown.
If you take the view that each is a separate attempt to model the earth's climate over the period in question, then the ensemble is likely to be a better estimate of the world's climate than
the individual runs, and the reduction in variance is simply an artifact of the fact that we have better information.
Are the trend fields for
the individual runs in degrees / year or degrees / decade?
The monte carlo aspect of
individual runs have to do with the setting of initial conditions (which can never be known totally precisely) along with random pertubations ranging over things which can't be precisely determined (even for an atomic weapon, which was the domain space for which Johnny Von Neumann invented the methodology — note: the hiroshima and nagasaki * did * explode).
Gavin's complaint about
individual runs versus ensemble averages in significance testing is half - right — so he's not as ignorant as some suggest.