Sentences with phrase «own knowledge of the world»

«It's about being better connected with the knowledge of the world and democratizing forces,» says John Lagerling, director of global partnerships for Android.
Second, AI capabilities are rapidly advancing across perception and cognition fueled by data and knowledge of the world.
You no longer need a billion dollar budget to make a breakthrough, but can use the collective knowledge of the world's scientists to imagine a new future.
The lifelong quest for knowledge of the world and self — not to mention gainful employment — has led me near and far afield, from Europe, across the Asia - Pacific, Middle East and Africa and back home to the Americas.
It has a proven track record of expanding our knowledge of the world and universe.
So yes, the first problem with the article was the word «smart» to describe general knowledge of world religions.
The proof the at least the Bible stories are non factual are basic common knowledge of our world and how it works.
Most theologians who employ the analogy of self: body:: God: world speak in these terms about God's knowledge of the world.
This implies, of course, an immediacy and concern in God's knowledge of the world impossible in the king - realm model.
Yet no matter what their degree of certainty, all notional assents agree in being farther removed from and dependent upon our direct knowledge of the world.
The first part of the same column deals with a topic that has recently become more prominent in the Christian interpretation of our scientific knowledge of the world, namely our experience of beauty.
God's complete knowledge of the world is required for an important aspect of God's relationship to the world.
In the soul - body analogy; God's knowledge of the world is transcendent in that it transcends human knowledge of bodily events because God is attuned to all while we are attuned to only our nervous system (and even that knowledge is imperfect).
The first is that a knowledge of the world as part of the self is continually at work in us at a prereflective level, even if we are not consciously aware of this fact.
Just as we would say that the person in the Chinese Box has no real knowledge of Chinese, Hartshorne would say that God does not have real knowledge of the world unless God is a sympathetic knower.
God's knowledge of the world is relative.
By removing the requirement of divine relativity we would be free to develop a conception of God that could have objective knowledge of the world.
Divine knowledge of the world presumes that God feels what everything else feels, so much so that, to use words Hartshorne does not, we are rivulets poured into the ocean of God's encompassing feeling.
Would you want to look like a dumb * as with little knowledge of the world?
History has shown that religion is not healthy for children, the planet, freedom, innocent civilians, people of other religions, little boys who trust priests, justice for the poor, education, knowledge of the world around us, social health, the arts...
On analogy; Hartshorne would say that God's knowledge of the world is never abstract but always concrete and participatory.
In order to provide an «infallible» guide for actuality; a «divine lure,» God requires cognitive infallibility; an in - depth knowledge of the world, precisely what only divine relativity and the assertion that the world is the body of God can fully explain, or so it is claimed.
Brightman's three stages in Personality and Religion are reminiscent of Descartes» attempt in the Meditations to restore our knowledge of the world on the basis of the cogito, but there the order is self, God, other minds, and finally nature.
The great strength of this approach is that it holds out hope of integral, unified knowledge of the world and of God; it is an intellectual vision that has epistemological and political consequences.
How then can you believe a book that is so patently foolish and so obviously a product of bronze age folk with little or no knowledge of the world and so full of inconsistencies and laughably foolish scenarios and notably misogynistic and brutal and racist and intolerant stories?
Similarly, if evidence continues to favor the occurrence of parapsychological phenomena, and if no special medium of such communication can be found, we should be glad to have available a conceptuality in which these phenomena can be understood in continuity with the rest of our knowledge of the world.
It has to struggle to combine creation by a free act of will with the absence of alternative possibilities for God, and to combine the contingency of the world with the necessity of God's act of creation and with the necessity of God's knowledge of that world.
Although a very important part of knowledge, it is a partial knowledge of the world.
If there is one thing more than another which any one will admit who has the smallest knowledge of the world, it is that men are always speaking gravely and earnestly and with the utmost possible care about the things that are not important, but always talking frivolously about the things that are.
It certainly could not lead the mind from knowledge of the world to knowledge of God.
While it may be hard to understand, our knowledge of the world has actually evolved over the last several thousand years so many of the ancient understandings of the way the world works — and written into religious text — are obviously and verifiably wrong.
That's why in my mind it really is no big deal and quite logical that people in certain places and certain times with a limited knowledge of the world and universe around them, could be quite useful tools in God's quest to create faith in people and save some of them.
If you are educated and living in the 21st century, how then can you believe a book that is so patently foolish and so obviously a product of bronze age folk with little or no knowledge of the world and so full of inconsistencies and laughably foolish scenarios and notably misogynistic and brutal and racist and intolerant stories?
Until the church can explain the ever growing fossil record, they are forcing people to search for alternate ways to believe in a higher power without contradicting their knowledge of the world around them.
Knowledge of the world, unless ruled by knowledge and control of the self, in the end means self - destruction.
I also got some neat stories from it, but scientific breakthroughs has furthered my knowledge of the world and universe around me, given me the tools to think critically and not just «go with the flow»
Indeed, the Dialectic of practical reason adds nothing to the principle of morality, assumed to be defined by the formal imperative; nor does it add anything more to our knowledge of our duty than the Dialectic of pure reason adds to our knowledge of the world.
Think the world is bad now just wait tell this world is full of people who feel they don't have to answer for anything that they do notice how these so called Atheists seek nothing but wealth knowledge of the world and fame.
To think of God as acting in dynamic relation to His creatures not merely as one actor among many, but as the universal creative power which sustains all things, and without which they could neither be nor act, is true to what our best knowledge of the world tells us.
We may go further and say that in the light of contemporary biblical study and of the knowledge of the world in which we live, the traditional, restricted view of resurrection is seriously defective.
The word of the church to the world must therefore encounter the world in all its present reality from the deepest knowledge of the world, if it is to be authoritative.
It is one aspect of the awakening of the churches generally to a better knowledge of the world about them.
''... Nowadays, given our knowledge of the World, the «miracles» the Church relies on are virtually always medical recoveries.
According to Rorty, philosophers have hoped to find a way of securing an absolute fit between our knowledge of the world and the world itself, to show that in at least one area of intellectual endeavor human knowledge really does «mirror» reality.
Even when time is sacrificed in order to acknowledge God's knowledge of the world, God was not really allowed to care.
We have set prayer in the context of the Christian faith that God is Love as revealed in Jesus Christ; and we have sought to take account of modern knowledge of the world so that prayer does not seem an unreal escape from the facts that we all know about that world.
They interpret the principle of indeterminism as indicating limits on the possibility of human knowledge of this world but not as indicating that the cosmology is incorrect.
Secondly, the judging subjects must have the requisite knowledge of the world defined by the first condition (PR 193/294).
The gospel is an ancient book initially developed by frightened bronze age tribesmen with little knowledge of the world.
All knowledge of the world depends upon classification.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z