Sentences with phrase «own particular religion»

The Trump administration has argued that the ban is necessary to prevent potential terrorists from entering the country and is not discriminatory because the text of the order does not mention any particular religion.

And that ethos will inevitably have been born in the context of a particular religion.

In my opinion, no, but out of respect for a particular religion who expresses that concern, then obviously, it should not proceed.

I don't belong to any particular religion, it's not my thing.

To force a Jewish or Muslim child to sit on the sidelines is to be treated in a discriminatory manner based upon their particular religion.

They insist on using government resources for private religious purposes and as a subsidy and apparent approval and support by the government of their particular religion.

more and more people DO NOT align them themselves with a particular religion.

A belief in God does not prove or disprove one's intelligence, just as being a member of any particular religion does not prove or disprove intelligence.

I am not a sheep, I prefer to make my own decisions on life instead of being indocrinated into any particular religion.

All say you must obey their particular religion and none others.

None of us were around to witness the events that brought any particular religion long, long, ago.

-- I have my own moral convictions, but it did not derive from any particular religion.

Even if you despise the particular religion afterwards or you think the Baptists are just plain wrong or the Mormons are wrong — maybe you should learn about them, tolerate their beliefs and believe whatever you want to believe, but do it with some respect.

What troubles me is how easy it can be to go from opposing evil and injustice to opposing people of a particular religions and / or political viewpoint.

He puts two categories that proof would fall under: the first category deals with «things that would absolutely convince me of the truth of a particular religion ``.

Thus it would tend to undermine the claims of any particular religion, although perhaps it was meant to give children an appreciation of «religion in general.»

To prove that he is open - minded, he is willing to convert if he could be convinced of the truth of any particular religion.

Dabblers are compelled by their very dabbling to disdain those who will not dabble and who persist in believing the truth claims of one particular religion.

As a non-believer, I find the idea that a particular religion would view a peacemaker as bringing about the end of the world very scary.

Teachings are accepted by the authorities of your particular religion and handed down over time.

What does Americans (who happen to belong to a particular religion or group) have to do with sending money to another country.

Is there good reason to think that when a particular religion has been so studied and explained, a complete and final explanation has been given?

It is the 1 % of each that make the rest of a particular religion look bad.

I consider myself a «Christ Follower» as opposed to one of a particular religion (my reason is, the church never saved anyone.

The morals of any religion are those of the times that that particular religion began.

Honestly, the people that think a particular religion matters are a dying breed.

You are shown a particular religion and you put your faith and trust into it.

Christian «Goodwill» in the form of large contributions rarely comes without an accompanying effort to use such goodwill as a form of establishment of the particular religion involved.

Falsely linking morality to a particular religion or to some political or military ideology is a time - tested «three card trick» uses to stop people from asking the hard questions which might lead to an abandonment of the relevant faith.

So all you can legitimately claim is that based on your imperfect partial understanding of some the world's religions none of those particular religions seemed to be true.

People who think that a candidate being some particular religion means that a candidates is somehow good as a person, a human, are not thinking too straight.

Repressive regimes often ally themselves with a particular religion as a means of control, and consequently encourage the punishment of those who won't abide by the tenets of said religion.

A particular religion or belief system has NO place in AA.

Catholic is not apart of christanity; every time you turn around this particular religion is performing horrific acts toward children.

(Religions act on their principles regardless of how the opposition responds) This implies that ISIS is nothing more than a business run by egocentric tyrants that happen to identify with a particular religion... thus tainting that religion with their insecurity as they attempt to use it as a platform to try and convince their selves of control and eliminate any challenge to their personal views... All because their figurative pee pees can't handle it.

[10] «ln our view there is an important difference between this factual information being imparted in a descriptive way as part of a wide - ranging syllabus about different religions, and a curriculum which teaches a particular religion's doctrinal beliefs as if they were objectively true.»

I'm not saying you have to subscribe to a particular religion.

If what a particular religion has practiced for years is all of a sudden no longer appropriate then the religions are obviously not very good at knowing what's right or wrong in the first place.

There are only particular religions.

The interesting thing is that you do nt have to study any religous book (and by religous book I take that to mean the authoritative book of a particular religion, like the bible, koran, etc.) to get to the truth.

Formerly, in the particular religions of tribes or nations religion was the expression of special interests, needs, insights, and cultural peculiarities.

I may not believe in any one particular religion, and I certainly don't believe in god, but even I believe that most religious people have common sense enough to avoid the type of hystaria that doomsdayers espouse themselves to.

Atheists talk about a secular state which is where the government doesn't interfere in anyones religious freedom, and it doesn't endorse any particular religion (or none).

After all, their argument for intelligent design does not identify the intelligent designer as the God of any particular religion.

Let's be honest: anyone who has a link to the «truth about religion X» is almost certainly trying to spread propaganda against that particular religion.

Actually all secular means is not pertaining to a particular religion or belief.

You don't have to believe in God or practice the various rites of a particular religion, but you would live a much more full life if you are exposed to those teachings.

He doesn't just disagree with the law, he actively wants his particular religion to be the law.

Typically though, there are plenty of religious adherents / nut jobs who would disagree, to the extent of telling us we really should blame a particular religion in its entirety, including everyone practicing it, so long as its not their own version being blamed.

This is part of the larger trend of what has been called «religicide» in the region: the intentional killing off of a particular religion within a given region or area of the world.