Sentences with phrase «own radical question»

It has freed men personally and intellectually to raise radical questions and to develop whole new disciplines of thought.
But this presupposes an even more radical question: What is justice?
We may go beyond the traditional theories of atonement and ask a radical question: «What account would be given of atonement if we were to interpret it from the standpoint of the most realistic analogies we know to human love when it deals with broken relationships and the consequent suffering?»
Radical questioning was the order of the day in every domain of thought, including religion.
One of the reasons for this radical questioning is that the very way in which we perceive reality has been changing.
This leads some men to pick and choose among the myths, retaining those which are not too impossible and rejecting others, but this procedure fails to get at the root of the matter, for the radical question is whether the truth of the New Testament can exist outside its outmoded mythological picture of the world.
The critique of the youthful counterculture permeated social consciousness; there was a radical questioning of the foundations of our bureaucratic technocracy and a resistance to what was perceived as Underwood's emphasis on quantitative / verifiable methods.
Any radical questioning of current theological and disciplinary norms clearly implied such criticism.
This rejection of the radical question as to why there is anything at all is also characteristic of Whitehead.
Rejecting the necessity for domination, it asks the radical question: Must there «always be a «servant» class, a facilitating group to take the mundane cares from the shoulders of the ««more important» group, and to be controlled by them?
There is, according to Cobb, no radical question about the being - here of either the world as a whole or of any actual entity in it.
Nonetheless, the radical question of existence never systematically enters his metaphysics.
Seriously entertaining Spaemann's and Pannenberg's radical question about the being - here of the particular entities within the world will start us down a path that Whitehead himself, as well as most of his disciples, chose not to tread.
I will argue that the separation of creativity and God can not be considered well - established until that radical question has been raised.
In culture, radical questioning was making inroads to the middle class.
Well, you know lately it has become a very radical question.
Previous crises have been accompanied by radical questioning of existing political and economic orthodoxies.
Appointment is an alternative to elections, but it is unlikely, I think, that existing political elites would be likely to appoint delegates truly willing to ask sufficiently radical questions about what kind of constitutional design might best fit the United States (or any other country) in the 21st century.
The possibilities raise a radical question about the moral status of human cells, noted Jan Helge Solbakk, head of research at the Center for Medical Ethics at the University of Oslo in Norway and chair of the society's ethics and public policy committee.
«Here we were asking a somewhat new question: whether «de novo» protein folding, to the properly folded «native» state could be assisted by a molecular «machine» — a pretty radical question for the time,» Horwich said.
Rather than seeking out the approval from other people, consider this radical question: what if we sought out our own self - approval first?
Back to Sandbox brings together an international group of artists who ask radical questions about the nature and significance of education in contemporary society.

Not exact matches

Beyond the fact that «advertising online» is a radical over-simplification of this complex proposition, misunderstanding and mixing the concepts of marketing and advertising, and often branding as well, will make any entrepreneur look inexperienced and can give investors and partners a reason to question your strategy.
As with many of her ex-husband's GoogleX projects, Wojcick's mission raises safety and privacy questions, while simultaneously offering up the possibility of radical, life - saving innovation.
Radical strategies start with heretical questions, and lead to great opportunities.
If the information involves radical changes to the company such as downsizing, a reorganization of management or a merger — it's in the company's best interest to hold open forum conversations to clearly communicate the information and be readily available to answer questions.
Airbnb gets less press than Uber, but in some respects its even more radical: understanding how it works leads one to question many of the premises of modern society from hotels to regulations.
It's a radical shift for one of Bitcoin's biggest names, and will no doubt raise questions over Bitmain's long - term plans.
http://radicalpersonalfinance.com/ I was just listening to a recent episode of «Radical Personal Finance» podcast where the host and arebelspy from the MMM forums are discussing this exact question.
This is one of the problems that often hinders dialogue with radical atheists (not sure you are one, but you did answer a question I posed to people who believe God is a fantasy)-- rather than offer a defense they will attack in such a way as to obfuscate the purpose of the original discussion.
Even Barth, upon whom I have relied here, can not keep from saying that the discontinuity «is not a question of the destruction but of the radical renewal of the child - parent relationship.»
So radical is the change in him that his reappearance in the old neighborhood generates no joy, no celebration, no welcome home, only questions and doubts.
Once Christ's radical acceptance eased their resistance, he made them aware of their motivations and the reality of their sin through careful questions.
Questions also are raised about the identity of the church that plays such a major role in the Radical Orthodox account of history, about whether there is a doctrine of providence implicit in it, about the dismissal or ignoring of Protestantism, about the role of Jesus in its Christianity, about the role of Socrates in its Platonism, about its failure to engage with the challenge of modern scientific and technological developments, about how other faith traditions are related to this version of faith, and about whether this is a habitable orthodoxy for ordinary life.
LOL at all the insecure radical atheists here bashing religion because they themselves have questions and insecurities about God.
It is the need to get further light on this question which has led in the twentieth century to a radical rethinking of the nature of pastoral care.
This is not a question of going back to the fight for survival, to «nature red in tooth and claw,» but the appearance of something infinitely more radical and sinister.
When even key IVCF supporters questioned her decision to include black students, the organization's board took a radical stance.
Despite the efforts of the Modern Church People's Union and «Sea of Faith» conferences and other theologically radical groups, many questioning followers of Jesus have drifted away from church life, or at least from participation in the church's decision - making forums, thus allowing undue influence to more traditional positions.
The principal critics of practical theology therefore advocate a radical rejection of modern questions about reason and practice in favor of a discussion in which the most important questions about the meaning and validity of the Christian message are assumed, precisely so that the details can be intelligently debated.
In the first section three points will be discussed: First, the basic relationship between democracy and the Church, secondly a fundamental difference between applying the concept of democracy to secular society and applying it to the Church, and thirdly that despite this radical differ - ence the question about democracy in the Church may yet be posed.
This is an important question, because if the answer is «no» then the radical response is in fact the only viable option for Christians.
It is more difficult because those who follow the radical response are at least asking the right questions, and sometimes the rest of us don't even question.
This is the question whether what happened at the first Easter was an objective event in the external world or whether it was simply a change of mind, radical and dramatic but not necessarily sudden, on the part of the disciples.
This problem is in fact the same question we discussed earlier; namel ~ whether God can understand radical individuality and particularity.
Ironically, since the time Wiebe began his crusade the kind of intellectual agenda that worries him most — calling into question the very canons of objective science — has entered the academic scene not through theologians but through postmodern philosophy and radical forms of cultural criticism.
but the fact that you are asking that question DOES mean you are actually hearing the radical nature of grace in comparison with the self - salvation of religion.
Although the formulation of the question was not always precise, the everyday experience of black suffering, arising from black people's encounter with the sociopolitical structures controlled by whites, created in my consciousness a radical conflict between the claims of faith on the one hand and the reality of the world on the other.
The experience of the survivors of Vietnam was not as radical; humankind may not have been in question, but the meaning of one's own possible death and the actual death of one's friends and enemies was in question.
Further, I question the adequacy of thinking of any present state as only present, for the present moment is never a mere mathematical point but (as the radical empiricists and phenomenologists have argued) is rather «thick» with past and future.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z