Sentences with phrase «own reply brief»

As WLF's reply brief points out, CFPB's position would upend the separation of powers.

WASHINGTON, DC — Washington Legal Foundation today filed a reply brief on behalf of its client, Chance Gordon, in the U.S. Supreme Court.

The Log Cabin Republicans» reply brief Friday said that the Justices» review of that case was opposed by the other challengers based on the argument that the Court should await the development of a full factual record at a trial on the policy's constitutionality.

On March 15, this 26 - page reply brief was filed in Chamness v Bowen, 11 - 56449.

On June 21, the Alabama Constitution, Green, and Libertarian Parties filed their reply brief in Stein v Chapman, which challenges Alabama ballot access procedures for putting the presidential nominee of an unqualified party on the November ballot.

In a 35 ‑ page reply brief filed yesterday with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, government lawyers argue once again that U.S. District Court Judge Royce Lamberth's ruling was erroneously based on the conclusion that the National Institutes of Health (NIH) guidelines for hESC research violate a law barring federally funded research that harms embryos.

«All of our commentary will be presented in our July 13 reply brief in court,» he said in an e-mail.

February 2, 2017 — Teacher Plaintiffs - Appellants» Reply Brief to the U.S. Court of Appeal for the at the Ninth Circuit

See: State's Reply Brief and Response to Cross-Appeal at 10, McCleary (No. 84362 - 7)(discussing ESHB 2261, chapter 548, Laws of 2009).

Undaunted by the state's positions, CCJEF counsel fired back a reply brief with 329 pages of exhibits.

(For those with less reading time available, his recent blog posting on SchoolFinance101 makes use of some key scattergrams from his CCJEF reply brief affidavit.)

In addition to the expert opinion, legal arguments pertaining to mootness and ripeness, as well as a strong defense of CCJEF's legitimate standing in the case, the reply brief was offered by counsel for the plaintiffs, Debevoise & Plimpton LLP (New York), with assistance from the Yale Law School Education Adequacy Clinic, both of which serve pro bono in this action.

I was amused in court last Tuesday to hear one of the judges correctly say that the defendants «take [the investigations] apart quite thoroughly in their reply brief».

As our reply brief shows, that is simply untrue.

This case was leanly staffed, allowing me to work one - on - one with one of the co-heads of the Los Angeles litigation group and to take on key responsibilities in the case including an ownership role over drafting our motion to dismiss, reply brief, discovery responses and requests, as well as communicating with opposing counsel.

The Chamber joined with a coalition of business groups to file a reply brief in support of its cross-motion for summary judgment in these two cases concerning the listing of the northern long - eared bat as a threatened species under the Endangered Species Act.

How far are we from A.I. being able to draft a reply brief that is more accurate, authoritative, and comprehensive than a seasoned lawyer could muster?

Apple's notice says: «This disclaimer moots Samsung's Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law, as set forth in Samsung's reply brief, that Apple's U.S. Patent No.

Bryan Garner provides a great example from a reply brief:

The petitioner's reply brief shall be filed by March 7, 2008.

This is exactly what Chief Justice John Roberts did in his reply brief in Intergraph Corp. v. Intel Corp..

For exemplary writing of an appellate brief, the Green Bag named Georgetown law professor Lisa Heinzerling and the other lawyers who wrote the petitioners» reply brief in Massachusetts v. EPA.

Parole is not back: footnote 3 of the SG's reply brief says the abolition of parole can be severed.

At the end of the reply brief, it becomes clear that Samsung's short - term priority is the «quick links» patent, which the Federal Circuit patent held not to be infringed but the other circuit judges, in their controversial en banc decision, reinstated the district court ruling and jury verdict.

Presumably in an effort to get earlier and ultimately more attention from the Supreme Court clerks evaluating cert petitions, Samsung yesterday filed (once agai well ahead of a deadline) an optional reply brief in support of its request that the Supreme Court review the Federal Circuit's en banc decision in the second Apple v. Samsung case (this post continues below the document):

Seila Law, LLC has submitted a reply brief in its appeal before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in connection with litigation involving the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

You can access online both the Brief for Appellants and the Reply Brief for Appellants.

Right at the start of its reply brief, Samsung points to the «contrary [to Apple's position] view of nine high - technology companies, thirty - seven intellectual property professors, three groups representing minority and rural communities, two public interest organizations, a high - tech industry organization, and a small company that have filed amicus briefs in support of the petition.»

The petitioner is then granted a three - month period to perform discovery on the patent owner's supporting evidence and to file a reply brief or present arguments needed to counter a proposed amendment.

In connection with Apple not addressing the real claim construction issue (the jury instructions on infringement), Samsung's reply brief says: «That is Hamlet without the Prince.»

The SCOTUSblog has published Samsung's reply brief in support of its petition for writ of certiorari (request for Supreme Court review) in Apple's design patents case.

Unfortunately, Ross, and other AI programs, can't read those cases and summarize what would be helpful for a live case, nor can it write a reply brief, motion, opposition, or pleading.

Although you do not want your reply brief to be a mere reiteration of your initial brief arguments, you almost always will want to start with a quick recap of the arguments advanced in your initial brief — preferably a single opening paragraph before you begin your reply.

In developing point (2), the reply brief makes these points (with some cites omitted) about the relevance of co-defendant disparity:

Some judges say they read the reply brief first, as it frames the issues to be decided.

Thanks to this post at White Collar Crime Prof Blog, I was able to access the 162 - page reply brief -LRB-!)

Plaintiff in its reply brief presented a detailed spreadsheet chart replete with billings, billing rates, and hours of work expended by plaintiff's attorneys.

WSJ.com's «Law Blog» has posted the reply brief filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit at this link.

Below, we discuss the defendants» responses, in their reply brief, to the arguments that plaintiffs make on those key issues in their opening brief:

filed Jan. 23, 2017); Reply Brief of Appellants to Brief of Appellee Smith & Nephew, Inc., 2017 WL 2211289 (3d Cir.

CFPB will file its reply brief in the PHH matter, responding to PHH's arguments and presumably those offered by numerous amici who have filed briefs opposing the CFPB's position.

Not exact matches

Write emails that are very brief, focus minimally on your company and include only essential information that will get the prospect to hit the reply button.

I sent a brief questionnaire to them, and many responded with long and fascinating replies.

Jesus replies with two brief parables.

A Brief Reply to Simoni - Wastila on the Problem of Radical Parti»

His reply was brief, and devastating: «You see, I come from Auschwitz.»

uh — yeah — sure you are — just judging from the brief reply you've submitted i find it very hard to believe you made it past the 8th grade.

In a very brief letter of May 19, 1944 replying to Hartshorne's long communication of Jan. 13, Brightman wrote that acting under his physician's direction «Dire physical necessity compels me to lag in our discussion, while agreeing our differences are linguistic.»

, to which Aquinas replies, in brief, No.

Briefing newsmen on the development at the party's national secretariat, Thursday, National Publicity Secretary of the party, Prince Dayo Adeyeye said following the issuance of a query to Ubah and his refusal to reply same, the party decided to suspend him for one month.