Sentences with phrase «own societal views»

I hope to convince J.D. that while I grew up with very liberal, Jewish parents (dad from South America) in California, and in a nuclear family without alcohol or violence, I experienced surprisingly similar parallels to many of J.D.'s societal views — even if we may have drawn moderately different conclusions about the underlying solutions.
A person's military affiliation has nothing to do with their political, religious, or societal views.
Societal views change all the time.
The most obvious solution might seem to lie in adopting the societal view of God, as Brown in fact recommends.
More importantly, for the societal view as well as for the entitative, the primordial nature is an adjustment of pure conceptual possibilities, so that although in the former view there is a temporality to its successive reconstitution, there is no temporality in its valuation.
Since this view introduces no new divine acts, it furnishes no new argument in favor of adopting the societal view of God.
Delwin Brown, supporting the societal view, writes: «On the entitative view, God is free but once (even if, as we shall consider later, «once» is to be construed in some unique nontemporal sense).
«Individuals and groups have strong political and societal views on this topic, and this program became a lightning rod for many of those views.»
Most recently, Bowman Clarke has used the claim that genetic succession is not in time in any sense to undermine John Cobb's basic argument (CNT 185 - 89) for the societal view (JAAR 48:563 - 79).
he's translating dogma to suit his own societal views.
The hate Christians have for gays come from cultural and societal views, not godly view.
If societal views on gender and sexual orientation are changing as rapidly as the secular media might have us think, it is high time the Church sought to form a theological and pastoral response to transgender and the psychological condition that usually pre-empts a gender transition, known as gender dysphoria.
This paper will examine the arguments on each side, indicate what the societal view implies about the nature of...
Recognition of the need for an interpenetrative societal view of the world, perhaps more than any specific philosophical requirement, has led process - thinkers to place their emphasis upon «becoming», as a dynamic movement of development in relationship, rather than upon «being»; here, they insist, is the best «model» for our understanding of God.
It is amazing how easily satan can influence the societal view with one fringe group.
This paper will examine the arguments on each side, indicate what the societal view implies about the nature of God, and suggest an additional argument for the societal view based on the idea of God's freedom and faithfulness which this view implies.
This meaning is preserved in the societal view since the structure of the primordial nature, its pattern of ordering, is in each successive divine occasion identical to the abstract pole of preceding occasions.
On the societal view, by contrast, God is repeatedly free.
Whitehead's statements about the singularity of the primordial nature, the advocate of the societal view may observe in response, can mean two different things.
Moreover, God, in the societal view, is faithful.
And the societal view of God, it seems to me, can account for the religious intuition of God's faithfulness.
If one points out that, on the societal view, the primordial nature can no longer be temporally prior, the answer is that this is true and that, moreover, it must be true on any Whiteheadian view.
Now one may observe, by way of rejoinder, that the loss of «first - handedness» is not avoided on the societal view.
The entitative view glosses a difference which the societal view may retain.
If the societal view is at least as defensible, metaphysically, as its alternative, then the superior adequacy of the societal view for our religious experience should be counted as additional evidence in its favor.
The societal view effects an even more radical change in the process conception of God's freedom.
And despite how Societal views have changed (mostly), the Church «Can't Budge», or that implies a wrong reasoning at some point in time, and «The Church can NEVER BE WRONG».
Trying to conceive of God» as one actual entity is likely impossible despite several attempts to clarify Whitehead's statements on the subject, 2 but neither has Hartshorne's societal view of God as a personal nexus been clearly conceived.
As Whitehead also applies the term «growth» to worldly macro-organisms (PR 188), i.e., to «societies,» the question arises if, and to what extent, he is covertly presenting a «societal view
This view clarifies the fact that God, also with regard to the consequent nature, is continually prehensible and so can be continually efficacious (this, quite unexpectedly, in contradistinction to the societal view), even if God's consequent satisfaction is never complete and hence God's subjective immediacy never perishes.
In the collection of articles based on lectures in honor of Hartshorne's ninetieth birthday, Nobo unfolds, in reaction to Lewis Ford, how in his opinion Gad is essentially immutable, imperishable and objectifiable.30 In doing this he agrees with Ford's criticism that Hartshorne's societal view of God does not offer an adequate Whiteheadian solution to the problem of God's objectifiability or prehensibility, but in contrast to Ford he is of the opinion that such a Whiteheadian solution is possible, and that it is even reasonably simple.
And thereby that the conception of God as one actual entity offers the possibility (and more so than the societal view) to conceive of God as efficacious with regard to worldly entities, even with respect to the consequent nature.
The societal view therefore creates a prehensibility problem while trying to solve one.
Further, the second consequence of the societal view is this: according to that view, God is time and time again briefly indeterminate.
One of these was A.H. Johnson who was the first to mention the possibility of a «societal view,» and thereby elicited an explicitly negative reaction from Whitehead.8 Others who entertain this view are, mainly, William Christian, Lewis Ford, Marjorie Suchocki, and Jorge Nobo.9 Amongst these, Ford is the only one who links his holding of the «entitative view» to an emphasis on the imprehensibility of God's consequent nature10 (and who later finds this so much of a problem that he starts searching in other directions, though not in that of the «societal view»).11 The other three — Christian, Suchocki, and Nobo — do see possibilities for a conceptually coherent account of the prehensibility of God.
If one wishes to retain the «societal view,» one must also retain the non-reversed polarity of God, and therefore also the existence of phases of indeterminateness in God.
The prime difficulty is that a reversal of poles requires an everlasting concrescence which is incompatible with the succession of concrescences required by the societal view.
Everyone knows divorce sucks, but, according to 2 people with a decent claim on «most brilliant power couple on the planet,» that very unanimity creates a societal view of divorce that just makes it worse.
Some stumbling blocks in the breastfeeding relationship that mamas may encounter include the modern societal view of breasts as solely sexual objects which often leads those in public places, including many churches, to shame mothers into hiding in restrooms or vehicles or at the very least using covers that make breastfeeding far more difficult and clumsy than it needs to be.
Thus, even the greatest child psychotherapist could not escape influencing the definitions and societal views on womanhood and motherhood.
This implies that an unresolved loss of desired birthing or breastfeeding experience may reinforce societal views of female self - disdain, and comments equating support for female physiology with hate for women.
«The societal view of dads is that we're bumbling fools,» Steve Dubin tells his all - male audience.
The learner will be able to describe the historic perspectives of societal views and causes of addiction
When one is younger it's so easy to be trapped in the societal views on what is chic and what is cool!
Not to forget, make way for women through the 20th century to defy the societal views.
Through my own experience in the LGBT community, I have concluded that although the societal views of alternative lifestyles are becoming more open and accepting, we still find ourselves in the position of trying to find happiness in our lives while confronting misconceptions, judgements and misunderstandings about what alternative lifestyles and what LGBT love is all about.
Let the person know that you're aware of societal views.
Thanks to a noteworthy shift in societal view and attitudes towards dating as well as an upward climbing trend for people over 50 to use the different social media channels like Facebook and Instagram as a launch pad to enter the online dating arena, more and more people over 50 are starting to find love thru the help of the digital cupid's arrow.
Again, this may suggest that Madden and Lenhart's (2006) conclusions about societal views of online dating more accurately represent people's real attitudes toward finding romance on the Internet than do the conclusions of scholars such as Anderson (2005) and Wildermuth (2001, 2004) such that — for persons of any age — online daters are no longer viewed in the pejorative terms they once were.
Historically teachers were seen as «candles of the people», lighting the way to Finnish independence, and this is still a very strong cultural and societal view (Booth, 2014).
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z