Sentences with phrase «own words against her»

Rupert Murdoch vs. Google The Australian media mogul has been waging a war of words against Google all year, accusing the company's news service of theft.

«There is so much liability for police officers today, and most things come down to a he - said - she - said,» Ward tells Inc. «If a police officer gets a complaint or goes to court, it's an officer's word against someone else's word.

Expect Sanders to employ similar words against GOP candidate Donald Trump if the two end up facing off in general election.

A couple more months more, and it wasn't them who ever said a word against Mustachianism, oh no guvnor.

But not a word against the meanest of David's cartoons pointed against a huge segment of the Church and its leaders.

Pornography culture has diminished and devalued women, and Christian men should not normalize this, but should speak a prophetic word against it, regardless of the political ramifications.

Jesus never said a word against being gay and god is smiting him for it.

If the rapture does happen when you say, I'll admit I'm wrong and never say another word against christianity.

Even if Martin lived it would still be just one person's word against another.

Even without the video tape, it is Perce's word AND the police officer's word against Elbayomy's word (he actually admitted the attack to the police officer originally).

They pointed out that slavery was practiced by the people of Israel and regulated by God, and that Jesus never said a word against slaveholding.

If he thought it was one person's word against the other then just dismiss the case.

Then Aquinas borrows Jerome's harsh words against those who pursue frivolous knowledge, thereby neglecting their duties: «We see priests forsaking the gospels and the prophets, reading stage - plays, and singing the love songs of pastoral idylls.»

One person's word against another.

«District Judge Mark Martin dismissed the case, saying it was one person's word against another's, and that there was no other evidence or eyewitness testimony to prove that Elbayomy had harassed or touched the alleged victim.»

This is not to criticize you but to speak gods word against the enemy's word, and to empower my fellow brothers and sisters.

Matthew includes here a statement (Mt 12:32; Lk 12:10) quoted later by Luke but not found in Mark; «whoever says a word against the Son of man will be forgiven.»

And if you are not proficient with the Word, Satan will use his twisted version of God's Word against you.

However, lawyers advise clients to not comment all the time since it is very easy for opposing lawyers to use your own words against you.

The only thing that bugs me about this guy is that there are more people than not who are teetering on the brink of faith in Jesus, and all this guy does is try to knock people away from faith... This is his word against Gods word, I've been reading these articles they've been posting, and nothing he's said has any biblical foundation whatsoever...

Anyone who speaks a word against the Son of Man, it will be forgiven him; but whoever speaks against the Holy Spirit, it will not be forgiven him, either in this age or in the age to come» (NKJV, emphasis added).

Until we accept this, our religious arrogance will violate his word against bearing false witness.

They will make false claims like the bible claims the earth is flat, and twist your own words against you.

The Reformers proclaimed that the sovereignty of God was both a critical word against the world and a gracious act of deliverance.

In 1915 the editors mounted their own battle of words against the «militarists» who preached preparedness for war.

This means that the freedom of God to speak a new word through the prophet, a word against the Church is denied.

It was not word against word.

If it was truly word against word then the Judge's verdict, I think, was appropriate.

Without either, you don't have a case, except word against word.

To suggest, then, that religious believers (much less majorities who, qua majorities, also have a second claim on shaping public policy) are «wards» depending on the Constitution for their religious freedom and its scope is, to use Posner and Segall's words against them, «to turn the Constitution upside down when it comes to government and religion.»

So to use your own words against you, «spamming this forum by posting your pseudo-intellectual diarrhea multiple times does not make it any more palatable.

So, you wouldn't say a word against any parent raising their kids to be racist, anti-Semitic, woman - beaters, or something else you'd consider problematic for their fitting in with society later in life?

Daniel 7:25 KJV And he shall speak great words against the most High, and shall wear out the saints of the most High, and think to change times and laws: and they shall be given into his hand until a time and times and the dividing of time.

Judge stated it was one mans word against another man's.

the Book say whoever speaks a word against the holy spirit will not be forgiven.

Your comment about «twisting» the facts just because Lycidas is using your words against you is one example of the crude generalizations I get frustrated about.

It was word against word.

No words against Joe Smith were ever to be spoken.

'' «twisting» the facts just because Lycidas is using your words against you is one example of the crude generalizations I get frustrated about.»

He may claim he's a Christian, but by testing his words against those of God, he clearly is not.

And yet Christains still divorce in HUGE numbers, despite Jesus» own words against the practice.

Remember that Jesus experienced many unjust and false words against Himself.

What is true is that the book of Daniel clearly states that - «He shall speak pompous words against the Most High, Shall persecute the saints of the Most High, And shall intend to change times and law.»

The prophetic word against religious hypocrites raises an extremely difficult question.

Once more they asserted the judgment and redemptive powers of God's Word against all forms of modern idolatry in the political, economic, and social realms.

This was predicted before the coming of Jesus, Daniel 7:25 states «And he shall speak great words against the most High, and shall wear out the saints of the most High, and think to change times and laws: and they shall be given into his hand until a time and times and the dividing of time.»

It should have a courageous word against the vices of pride and encouragement for the elements of the good life.

The pagan temptation,» as the philosopher Thomas Molnar described it, is hardly new — the Church has been fighting paganism since the time of Christ — but what is new is its aggressive resurgence, its seduction of so many Christians, and the warnings Pope Francis has issued against it.The Pope's scorching words against paganism have not been well - received by many, but Francis has gone right on assailing it, particularly in areas that pagans care about most: the environment and sex.Francis has been a bold and eloquent defender of the environment, and understands that protecting the environment is not a recent fad, but a long - standing Catholic principle, highlighted by many of Francis's predecessors.

Just as the fifth commandment of the first pentalogue bears a climactic and summary relationship to the four preceding commandments (see comment on 20:12), so this injunctive word against illicit traffic through the mind is sum and climax of the pentalogue in protection of Israel's integrity.

The Southerners replied that Jesus nowhere condemned slavery nor ever spoke a word against it.