Sentences with phrase «owners know the dangers»

Not exact matches

Pets can be seen almost anywhere in your neighborhood, and while these little dogs can bring happiness to their owners, you know that these pets can still bring danger and fear.

Still, as an owner of a dating site (running on SkaDate dating script or not), it is in your best interest to know everything about scammers» techniques, spot them on time, and forewarn your members about potential dangers.

With the invention of the Internet, most dog owners have become much more literate than twenty years ago, we all know about the external parasites, about the dangers they pose and how to get rid of the pesky bloodsuckers.

Founded in 1986 Last Chance has two centres that rescue dogs which can no longer be looked after by their current owners and Welsh pound dogs in danger of being put to sleep.

Dog owners are well aware of the threat of heartworm disease, but many pet owners would be shocked to know that their cats are in danger as well.

As a pet owner, it is important to know about the dangers around your animals.

This is in part due to the increase in cars on the road, but could be significantly reduced if owners could find a way to ensure that their dog «knew» the dangers posed on our roads.

His deep desire to protect his owner and family is unmatched, and the GSD is even known to put his life in danger to save others.

Do not smoke marijuana near your pets The dangers of second hand smoke exposure from tobacco are very well - known, and owners, in general, do avoid smoking cigarettes when their pets are present.

There are stupid people and ignorant ones and those who are putting dogs in danger and not giving them fresh water, air, and subjecting them to hot cars no doubt about it the few who do this are making it difficult for responsible dog owners to travel with their dogs to errands and store for 5 - 10 minute stops which is unfortunate the few who have abused dogs and harmed them make it very uncomfortable for those responsible owners to enjoy traveling with their pets.

Q: What do pet owners need to know about the possible dangers associated with over-the-counter topical flea treatments?

It is necessary to prove that the owner of the property took part in creating the hazardous environment, or knew about the issue and failed to resolve it or warn patrons of any imminent danger.

When a property hazard goes unaddressed, the owner should be responsible but might either claim not to have known about the danger or dispute your visitor status.

They will help you understand whether you have a valid claim against a property owner who knew or should've known about the danger posed by the condition that led to your injury.

Represent victims of negligent property owners who have not taken reasonable steps to protect tenants, visitors, and others from known dangers on their premises.

However, the law states that property owners can not intentionally set up traps or hazards to purposefully injure trespassers, and they must even warn trespassers of any known dangers that might not otherwise be noticeable.

A business or property owner is legally obligated to keep their building free from known risks and they must remedy any found dangers within a reasonable amount of time.

The owner knew of the danger and negligently failed to leash or contain the dog.

Slip and Fall Accident: A business or property owner is legally obligated to keep their building free from known risks and they must remedy any found dangers within a reasonable amount of time.

This can be done in several ways, you must be able to show that it was the fault of the property owner or manager that the surface was compromised, that they knew of the danger and did nothing about it, or you that the property owner should have known about the compromise as any reasonable person would know.

Due to a recent ruling by the Supreme Court of Texas, it is easier for businesses and property owners to defend against premises injury cases like slip and fall accidents, specifically dangers that are deemed «known or obvious.»

However, the court ruled in favor of the store, saying that property owner liability «does not impose a duty to warn about known or obvious dangers.»

As a result, property owners are only required to warn of dangers that they actually know exist and are also not required to detect and make repairs.

The burden is upon the injured person to demonstrate that the property owner was negligent and should have known of dangers on the property before any injuries occurred.

You must be able to prove that the owner of the property knew, or should have known, that there was a dangerous condition on his property and did not act to lessen the danger.

Business owners have a duty to warn invitees of both latent and hidden dangers of which they know, or should know.

Property owners have a responsibility to take reasonable steps to protect tenants, visitors, and others from known dangers.

The appellate court explained that to recover compensation in a premises liability claim, a plaintiff must show that the defendant knew or should have known about the danger and that the plaintiff lacked knowledge of the danger, in spite of his ordinary care, due to actions or conditions within the owner's control.

Owners (and occupants) with these kinds of dangers on their land are presumed to know that there is danger on their property and are required to take steps to safeguard people from harm.

For these visitors, the premises owner must correct or warn of dangers the owner knows or should know of through reasonable care.

Under Texas law, the owner of residential or commercial property has a duty to maintain the property so as to avoid injury to visitors or, in the alternative, to provide adequate warning of any known or expected dangers.

This could also mean that the property owner knew of a danger related to an elevator and failed to take steps to fix it.

If a property owner knows about a hazard and does nothing to fix it or warn visitors about the danger, he or she may be held liable (legally responsible) in a premises liability lawsuit.

This liability stems from the duty of property - owners and renters to maintain their property and keep visitors safe from known or discoverable dangers.

A new Florida law makes the victim find admissible evidence that the business owner knew of the danger that caused their accident, or had «constructive knowledge» of it.

Property owners are nonetheless liable for any known dangers which lead to an accident.

An owner can be found liable for your injury whether the danger was known or unknown at the time of the accident.

If the owner creates a potential danger that the property owner should know would attract children to it, then the owner does have a duty to make the danger reasonable safe.

However, if the owner sees the trespasser in time to prevent an injury, then the owner has a duty not to willfully or recklessly injure them, and to warn them of dangers that are not known or obvious.

Property owners that allow the public onto their land are required to inspect for known dangers and to keep the premises safe for guests.

For individuals in this category, the owner only has a responsibility to warn about dangers that he or she knows about.

Property owners have a duty to protect licensees from known dangers (e.g., if an owner knew his front walkway was broken and hazardous).

If you are injured on another person's property and want to seek compensation, you must show that the property's owner or tenant knew or should have known about the dangers in the property and did nothing to fix it.

For property owners to be liable, they must know of a danger, the danger must not be apparent to the public and the owner must chose not to warn others of the danger.

There are many town and city ordinances that make the banks (owners) responsible for the upkeep of the properties I know in california because of the danger of west nile virus swimming pools are espeically on the radar.Call code enforcement in your are to complain of the blight of the foreclosed homes