Sentences with phrase «owners money because»

This could save owners money because it can maneuver the charge times around peak electricity demand in your town.

Not exact matches

In my NYT bestselling book, Killing Sacred Cows, I warn people of the 15 major problems of the 401 (k), including: you're not the owner but only the beneficiary of your 401 (k), the government can change the rules at any time, you can't get to the money until 59 1/2, and the fees are typically much higher than most investments out there because you've added complexity and layers of administration and legal fees.

And because of the materials he had, including his rock saw that he uses for the trenching, he was able to provide a more efficient and much cheaper service than others for the customers, who are usually large - ranch owners investing a lot of money to save their trees.

But take this warning — I have seen many businesses suffer and fail because the owners have «killed the golden goose» by taking too much money out of the business.

One small - business owner came to Kay because he was extremely controlling with money, and his wife was getting frustrated with the behavior.

I have often seen cases in which entrepreneurs are unable to repay relatives because they subsequently raise money from professional investors who do not look kindly on business owners who try to repay one class of equity investors before others.

Keller points out that one of the reasons to own a franchise in the first place is because owners almost always make money when they sell; but in the U.S. most teams aren't making profits from attendance and TV revenues are small compared to other leagues, all of which dampens buyer interest.

The less capital a business requires to run, the more attractive it is to an owner because the more money he or she can extract in the form of dividends to enjoy life or reinvest in other projects.

I would be remiss if I didn't mention these people as potential sources of a small business loan, because so many small business owners and would - be entrepreneurs get the money they need to start or carry on their enterprise from these folk that I listed it as the second most popular source of small business loans in my article, 8 Sources of Business Start Up Mmoney they need to start or carry on their enterprise from these folk that I listed it as the second most popular source of small business loans in my article, 8 Sources of Business Start Up MoneyMoney.

The owner of 12 Tesla shares wrote this would minimize conflicts and brought up the acquisition of SolarCity Corp., a deal that was criticized in part because of Musk's links to the money - losing panel installer.

The problem arises, however, when expectations become mismatched: The Gordons no longer sought to create wealth because they did not need more money in their bank accounts, while owners of the enterprise presumably bought shares because they wanted to get richer.

Loads of startup companies out there have the potentials to grow, expand and make huge returns on investment, but their growth and profitability is limited because the owners might not have the required money to invest into it.

Do you have a dream to be an entrepreneur or business owner but you are afraid to pursue such dream because you don't have money?

Other types of accounts, such as Money Markets, Certificates of Deposit, and investment accounts, may have multiple owners (usually spouses) because the money belongs to both parMoney Markets, Certificates of Deposit, and investment accounts, may have multiple owners (usually spouses) because the money belongs to both parmoney belongs to both parties.

Central banking has never worked because when you give a private bank, with private owners, free reign to control a country's currency, unfortunately there are no checks and balances to stop those individuals from printing money irresponsibly, or to advance their own interests.

While my dad owned his business, he was not in the business owner quadrant because if he was not working, he wasn't making any money.

The bar owner told Shantal it was against the rules to have a baby because that meant less money for him.

If you were a business owner, you'd know that even though you may have held the money out of their paychecks and sent the premiums in, it's still your employees paying for it, because it's part of the compensation package you promised them.

When I was growing up, there was a house just down from ours which took the owners about 17 years to build because they kept running out of money.

Should we tear down the University of Virginia because it was founded with the money of slave owners?

Why can we not compete with Everton John0711, Because Farhad Moshiri has AMBITION, that's why he sold his shares in AFC, him and Usmanov can't get a seat on the board cause our Yankee Doodle owner is afraid off them so he cut and run and invested in a club he could actually invest his own money into turning into a force.

If your answer is YES, then the only problem here is the owner who has not sack Wenger because he obviously love what the man (Wenger) is doing for him... making money like we did this summer making a profit on transfers when other clubs were spending lots of money upgrading their teams.

As long as we don't have a owner willing to invest in big money into the team, then there's very slim chance the club can compete because you already are losing at the race's starting line before it even begins.

if you buy sesaonal tickets then the owners and the board are not bothered even if the fans decide to boycott games because the money is already in the bag.

Prior to the lockout, Owners cried out that they could not compete with the teams that made the most money, because they in turn, had the most to spend.

First they get to report it, then they get to rip it to pieces, then they get to pointing out how he can only say whatever he's said because the club owner has so much money, whether that's relevant to anything or not.

He doesn't want to spend anything because he is happy with his returns... He doesn't have ambition to win PL or CL... There is difference between owner of Man Utd and Arsenal... Man Utd is also having Business money unlikely Chelsea and Man City who are having oil money in their Bank accounts....

The only reason why Man City and Chelsea have won the league recently and been doing slightly better than Arsenal, is because they have super rich owners who have pumped bottomless pits of money into their clubs.

So I'd rather we keep the players, play them till their last day then they can leave because if we sell Sanchez or the Ox right now that money will probably go out in dividends to the board or owner or wherever it normally disappears to and we will have no Sanchez and no replacement.

Wenger signed podolski, sanogo, famini because they were free, they are now all deadwoods.I remember wenger saying sanogo will make headlines on the pitch, he was the reason afobe was sold.Also no dm and st for some time now bcuz of their space.Cheap and free player to save money for club owners in the bank remain rich club and relevant in cometitions, thats wengers policy!

Because as an outsider, I had this image of Jeffrey Loria as some sort of disinterested plutocrat, content to collect taxpayer money for his new park and revenue - sharing money — not unlike the way a laundromat owner would be content to show up every week and empty the quarters out of the machines.

Because you've got an owner there that says, «You're gonna get this guy, this guy I'm paying this much money to, a chance to get hit and get hurt?»

I think the names mentioned above likes of Barca, Real or Chelsea does not match with Arsenal only because traditionally Barca or Real are very wealthy clubs, Chelsea has Sugar Daddy owner hence we can not compare ourselves with these teams... Frankly Speaking its all down to money factor....

Its right that it is ambition but you should consider the amount of Money so called Pep has spent because of oil king owner... You can not go and randomly compare the situation... Wenger is bad in recent years but it doesn't mean that Pep is world class... Look at his record??

this shit storm has been coming for ages and the manager, the owner and the board have chosen to ignore it because the top 4 money keeps rolling in.

Emirates stadium and huge sponsor deals we finally have had two poor years by his standards at the helm we always havent been so great and are we weak supporters or strong give him a contract i mean hes won with ants for money let him spend for once cause even if we do get new manager inflation has occured and no body else will win with the small amounts we gave him to spend and in 20 years actuall more it seems the club is finally willing to spend give him a contract let him spend and if we do nt improve which i think we will i think that the club is finally willing to spend shows were on an upturn because as long as top four the owner and board weren't and after we spend big or somewhat big for once and auba and mkhitaryan arent the big im hoping for i want more if liverpoodlians can pay 75million for a cb let wenget spend a bit and if we still do bad we can always sack him or ask him to leave wouldnt be uncommon but we owe it to him and do nt say we do not because emirates london colney that will bring in high talent here for years to come and we have never spent for him just gave little and hes always done big things with little i think he can do bigger things in his final years if we give him big i do nt see us in decline but if we sack him we will be for a good three maybe four years

Goodell is a money - grubbing, low - class, low IQ scumbag that unfortunately has the support of most owners, because they want the same thing he does: screw the game, just make an extra buck.

Some fans (well, the delusional ones) said that Wenger was becoming ruthless as he got Cech... Transfer who was sanctioned by the Chelsea owner (without Mourinho clearance) and we know it would have never happened in other cases (no «balls» in our camp to shake things up, always playing fair or «p*ss y» like... Saw Gazidis interview with those people from Arsenal fan tv who could not even ask the hard questions, but were trembling because the «money man» was out... It was embarrassing to see...!)

(3) this team is rotting from the inside out and it's going to take some unprecedented moves on the part of this board and the fans to facilitate the necessary changes... this club must rid itself of it's absentee billionaire landlord before we become just another sporting wasteland in this man's collection of flailing clubs... when this is done it will expose just what exactly has been going on behind the scenes and I'm afraid of what will be uncovered because if Wenger's business model is as antiquated as his football philosophy it could look an awful lot like and old Monty Python sketch in the backroom... we need to replace the owner with someone who actually cares about this club and isn't afraid to wear their emotions on his or her sleeves or spend their own money to achieve greatness... this new owner needs to find someone who represents the same sort of cutting edge that Wenger represented in his early years then pair that individual with someone who knows how to conduct transfers in the modern era... then and only then will we find a way to escape the malaise that has permeated our once storied club for way too many years

The board, the owner are all happy because Arsenal FC is making them a crap load of money.

But despite the potential of social media to bridge the gap between the sport and its fans F1's previous owners put heavy restrictions on how teams and drivers could utilise it — especially when it comes to video — because obviously if Bernie couldn't make money from it, he wasn't interested.

My hard earned pension money is spent travelling down from Scotland because I support ARSENAL FOOTBALL CLUB through good and bad times and despite who the board, owner, manager or players represent our club.

Nothing gonna happen unless board granting money to Wenger to spend in the market and granting funds in the hands of Kronke as his the owner of the club because he is the major shares of the club... So as said by Wenger he is going to buy only 1 or 2 signings this season....

We should not dream high about euphoric transfer market signings because we have to accept that though we may be a wealthy club because recently KPMG had valuations of Football Clubs where Arsenal stands 6 in most Valuable Football brands but still we have to accept that our Owner don't want to spend money to improve team... Owner is happy on the returns he is earning from Arsenal...

This is a decent article, yet the negatives from fans are still there, I would love to see arsenal like I did at the end of the 90's and at the beggining of the 2nd millennium but it doesn't mean in order to do so I would buy all the best players in world, I would get a rich owner to put his filthy money in, change the manager every 2 years to do so, there's so much wrong in football nowadays that yes it's still a sport but there's more focus on the filthy amounts of money being spent on clubs and players that I think attracts more attention than the game itself, now that is wrong and it's very wrong, even our owner though not like the arabs or Russians, yet the yank is clueless about the tradition of our game, it's just sad, so the fact that Wenger has remained for this long through all these changes that have occurred whilst the money game has elvolved, it makes me happy that arsenal do not spend stupid amounts of money on players, we don't try and buy the league, hell we even tight with wages and transfer fees, I'm glad it's like that, though our season ticket is a rip off I still don't mind it because at least we are not like the other supreme teams, there's a bit of tradition left at our club, yet you go to man shitty or Chelski, there is no tradition, it's all about buying ur way all the way to the top, on the other hand spuds don't know what to make of them besides how the heck have they finished above us?

The owner (Kronke) could care less about the running because he knows shit about English football and as long as he makes money..

When you observe, anytime those vehicles break down, you find that their owners come with mechanics because the drivers are not holding the money there.

«Raising the threshold from $ 2,000 to $ 2,500 guarantees the eventual deregulation of Manhattan and every other prime neighborhood, because the big landlords, the owners of valuable real estate, will expend the money to reach the $ 2,500 threshhold, will do it the legal way, and there will be no way to stop it,» said McKee.

Business owners oppose this law because they will lose money, no longer being able to sell to this clientèle.

Because local shops don't make such a big profit, the money they make circulates much faster than it would in a large corporation, as owners purchase supplies and employ workers — driving the money right back into the community.