Sentences with phrase «ownership laws prohibiting»
Foreign ownership laws prohibiting non-Canadian bookselling operations ought to go the way of the dodo.
http://www.canadianbusiness.com/ Not exact matches
Preventing ownership of firearms by domestic abusers: State law currently prohibits the possession of firearms by those who have been convicted of felony or «serious» offenses.
Except as otherwise prohibited by applicable law, virtual items obtained by you are licensed to you, and you hereby acknowledge that no title or ownership in or to virtual items is being transferred or assigned hereunder.
These laws seek to regulate or, in some cases, prohibit the ownership of everything from constrictors and ferrets to monk parakeets and tetras in addition to the «lions and tigers and bears» we might reasonably associate with adjectives like dangerous and wild.
Indeed, the English Parliament protected the status of the breed with a law in 1016 that prohibited ownership to «meane persons» and allowed only conditional ownership to «freemen.»
I learned recently that Virginia (where I am currently living) laws state «No canine or canine crossbreed shall be found to be a dangerous dog or vicious dog solely because it is a particular breed, nor shall the local governing body prohibit the ownership of a particular breed of canine or canine crossbreed.»
Housing laws and policies that ban pets, prohibit specific breeds, require cats to be declawed or dogs to be debarked or severely restrict pet ownership based on size should be rejected.
Therefore, the Yakima Humane Society opposes laws that prohibit or restrict the ownership of dogs based on breed and will strive to educate the public on responsible pet ownership and the ineffectiveness of such laws.
We can make great strides forward by providing information to promote responsible pet ownership, and by continuing to enforce the laws prohibiting acts of animal abuse and neglect.
Shall the ordinance repealing the County's 23 year old law prohibiting the ownership of pit bulls as a dangerous breed of dogs become effective?
Douglas Hallward - Driemeier of Ropes & Gray LLP is famed for his headlining work in significant civil rights and constitutional appeals, including recent work representing medical associations and physicians at the Eleventh Circuit to successfully challenge a Florida law prohibiting physicians from making inquiries of patients over firearm ownership.
«ABA Commission on Ethics 20/20 Will Not Propose Changes to ABA Policy Prohibiting Nonlawyer Ownership of Law Firms.»
You could call «ownership» an act in those circumstances, although the question seems to suggest that there is some constitutional or other requirement that laws only prohibit «acts» and that is not the case.
This video was taken of my presentation, Lawyers in Wonderland, or Why the ABA Should Undertake a Wholesale Reformation of Model Lawyer Ethics Rules, and Specifically Rule 5.4, which Currently Prohibits Non-Lawyer Ownership or Investment in Law Firms, at ReInvent Law Laboratory's London Conference in June, 2014...
While this proposal might have been considered a breakthrough, the House of Delegates adopted it in February, 2016 with a significant caveat: «that nothing contained in this Resolution abrogates in any manner existing ABA policy prohibiting non lawyer ownership of law firms or the core values adopted by the House of Delegates -LSB-...] on July 11, 2000.»
Since there is no initial transfer of ownership in the typical case of software licensing, the relevance of copyright law is that it establishes the basis for prohibiting you from using the software.
... nothing contained in this Resolution abrogates in any manner existing ABA policy prohibiting non lawyer ownership of law firms or the core values adopted by the House of Delegates.
In the United States, lawyers are prohibited from splitting legal fees with nonlawyers and therefore banned from sharing ownership of a law firm.
The talk was entitled, Lawyers in Wonderland, or Why the ABA Should Undertake a Wholesale Reformation of Model Lawyer Ethics Rules, and Specifically Rule 5.4, which Currently Prohibits Non-Lawyer Ownership or Investment in Law Firms.
At its meeting on April 12 - 13, 2012, [40] the [Commission] decided not to propose changes to the ABA policy prohibiting nonlawyer ownership of law firms... The Commission considered the pros and cons, including thoughtful comments that the changes recommended in the [December 2, 2011 paper] were both too modest and too expansive, and concluded that the case had not been made for proceeding with even a form of nonlawyer ownership that is more limited than the D.C. model.
The law governing lawyers, that prohibits lawyers from sharing legal fees with nonlawyers and from directly or indirectly transferring to nonlawyers ownership or control over entities practicing law, should not be revised.
It states «nothing contained in this Resolution abrogates in any manner existing ABA policy prohibiting non lawyer ownership of law firms.»
The split was Clearspire's workaround for the investment hurdles presented by professional conduct requirements prohibiting non-lawyer ownership of law firms.