Sentences with phrase «ownership of business where»

It also examined policies that would enable Canadians to exercise greater control over their own economic development and to retain and increase Canadian ownership of business where feasible or desirable for economic, social, cultural or other reasons.

Not exact matches

The sentiment seemed widespread on tech and media Twitter: there was a lack of specificity in terms of questions about privacy (this allowed Zuckerberg to turn nearly every question about the ownership of data to a discussion about user interface controls that limit where data is shown to other Facebook users), plenty of dodged questions (every time there was a question about the data Facebook generates about users beyond what they themselves enter into the system Zuckerberg needed to «check with his team»), and bad questions that presumed Facebook sells data, letting Zuckerberg run out the clock at least three times by explaining the basics of Facebook's business model (this is precisely why I have been so outspoken about the problem of perpetrating this falsehood: it lets Facebook off the hook).

Because most ESOPs in closely held companies take place in situations where the founding owner wants to retire and cash out of the business, the issue of diluting profit per share and diluting the ownership and governance rights of majority shareholders is not a material issue in these cases.

In some cases, where ownership is dispersed among a number of different owners — such as a large law firm or medical group, for instance — the bank will consider and sometimes accept a limited guarantee shared by all business partners, says Battles.

The problem with such a risk profile is that it is very similar to an investment in equities, where investors accept much less security for the upside of an ownership stake in the business.

Here's a letter to the board of Biglari Holdings re: executive compensation [Noise Free Investing] & then more thoughts on Biglari's compensation agreement [My Investing Notebook] Where things stand in the market [Bespoke Investment Group] A list of stocks Nasdaq is canceling trades in from yesterday's madness [Business Insider] The best interest rate chart in the world [Trader's Narrative] A great macro overview from Barry Ritholtz [The Big Picture] A look at John Paulson's possible ownership of Bear Stearns CDOs [Zero Hedge] John Mauldin on the future of public debt [Advisor Perspectives] Top buys & sells from Morningstar's ultimate stock pickers [Morningstar] The truth about «Sell in May & Go Away» [WSJ] An interview with hedge fund manager Hugh Hendry [Investment Week] Bill Ackman: Let's have a public registry for stock opinion [Barron's] Hedge fund Harbinger hires ex-Orange chief for wireless plan [Dealbook] & Deutsche Telekom has been in talks with Harbinger [FT] Hedge funds begin to restructure fee system [FT]

He is also a Partner at HPM Partners where, with his 32 partners and 50 associates in six offices, he works with owners of businesses on their growth strategies, M&A, financing, liquidity, wealth management, cross - border / multi-national issues, estate planning and tax strategies; and for his multi-generational and family clients, he brings several lifetimes of dealing with family dynamics, trusts, business - ownership, family charters and youth education as a member of two large, historic business families.

The aim of a progressive political economy ought to be forging a resilient and balanced economy where people and businesses can plan ahead; delivering more egalitarian outcomes that narrow the inequalities of wealth and ownership which characterise modern capitalist economies; and sustaining growth that is necessary both for rising living standards and improvements in public services.

«And by focusing investment where it is most needed to deliver sustainable growth and offering real ownership of vocational training to employers, we are equipping businesses with the skills they need to rebalance our economy and distribute opportunity more widely.»

If this becomes a viable business model that can compete with comiXology and similar platforms, and here it is worth noting that Top Shelf recently began selling DRM - free copies of selected books, I imagine that I will increasingly turn towards these independent storefronts for books where I desire the rights, and responsibilities, of ownership, and not just a right to read.

They don't have to, IMO, move into content ownership and production, since they own such a huge percentage of the collective screens, and have built out the «marketplace» so well where so much of the business is done they can collect their tax and negotiate strongly on revenue splits.

The «protectionist instincts» that I and others have are (1) to protect the independence of the bar (sure to be lost eventually under nonlawyer ownership), (2) to protect the health of the legal marketplace (sure to be badly harmed by the cartelization of ABS (see the 5 % commissions charged by the cartel of real estate agencies who still control the vast majority of the realty market, and especially see the ridiculously high costs of dealing with the American title insurance industry where four companies have upwards of 87 % of the conveyancing and title insurance market after first decimating the real estate bar with predatory pricing and other unfair business practices)-RRB-, and (3) to protect the public from those ravages.

Our Copyright Assignment includes information like: the name and description of the work; the current owner of the copyright (whether it's a business or an individual); who's receiving the ownership of the material; and when and where the agreement will be signed.

This is different than a partnership or sole proprietorship where a change in ownership can result in the destruction of the business entity.

Andy Daws, Riverview's vice-president North America, says the 2007 Legal Services Act, which was designed to promote competition, innovation and the public and consumer interest, has made the U.K. «the world's legal laboratory right now,» where experiments in ownership structure, service delivery, and alternative business models are being carried out, with varying degrees of success.

We acted, in conjunction with several international law firms, including our tie - up office, Addleshaw Goddard LLP, as a legal advisor for a UK - based, London Stock Exchange (AIM) listed company that is engaged worldwide in the business of pharmaceuticals in a transaction that could be worth as much as ￡ 100 million, where this company sought to acquire 100 % ownership of a globally oriented Singaporean company engaged in the distribution of highly specialized pharmaceutical and medical technology in Asia, Africa and Australia.

For example, where a testator's adult children are expecting to share equally in the ownership and management of an income property — and the testator would prefer to leave that asset to just one of the children − the will can include an explanation of the testator's reasons: for example, that she thought it would be impractical for the children to make the necessary business decisions jointly.

What the Bill sets out is simply a licensing framework for businesses carrying out reserved legal activities where 10 % or more of the ownership or management of those businesses is under the control of non-lawyers.

Where lawyers retain at least 90 % of the ownership and control of the business, it will qualify as a low - risk ABS with a correspondingly lighter touch licence.

And most importantly, ensure that your organisation fosters an atmosphere of openness and mutual respect where, no matter what the position held, your employees feel able and encouraged to share ideas, question processes and take ownership over the future of the business.

Building an atmosphere where people feel that they can take ownership of what they do is one of the best things you could do for your business, leading to a better working environment and a rise in productivity.

We are also conceiving of a situation where individuals own all or part of their property and are using this ownership as collateral in order to borrow capital to fund a business venture and or build another home for example.

242 DOS 97 Matter of DOS v. Hinds - deposits; proper business practices; fraudulent practices; due process; exparte proceeding is proper where there is evidence of proper service of process; unlawful retention of deposit monies constitutes larceny; illegal exercise of right of ownership over principals» funds is conversion; broker's illegal retention of deposit monies of principals in four, separate real estate transactions is a fraudulent practice; broker's failure to pay lawfully obtained judgments without a showing that he is unable to do so is a demonstration of untrustworthiness; license revocation; restitution with interest

We offer more than 100 engaging educational courses a year at a significant discount to members, and our advocacy work not only takes action on the issues affecting their business but also helps create stronger and healthier communities where home ownership is both accessible and affordable.REALTORS ® enjoy unlimited access to our legal resources, tech helpline and the services of our trusted network of affiliate members, so they stay informed, connected, protected and profitable.

107 DOS 98 Matter of DOS v. Sosis - subject matter jurisdiction; due process; failure to appear at hearing; proper business practices; deposits; fraudulent practice; DOS fails its burden of proof; DOS has subject matter jurisdiction if at the time the disciplinary proceeding was commenced by proper service of a notice of hearing and complaint the party was (i) licensed to engage in regulated real estate activities, or (ii) an applicant for either a license or for the renewal of a license to engage in regulated real estate activities, or (iii) eligible to automatically renew the prior license under the two - year limitation provision of RPL § 441 (2); ex parte hearing is permissible upon proof of proper notice of hearing; DOS has subject matter jurisdiction where party was licensed at the time proceeding was commenced and, where at time of hearing, although not licensed was eligible to automatically apply to renew pursuant to RPL § 441 (2); licensee operated a real estate brokerage business under an unlicensed name; licensee unlawfully retains deposit funds after deposit monies were delivered on the condition that same were to be disbursed only on the principal's consent and approval and said consent and approval was not given; licensee's illegal exercise of right of ownership over his principal's funds spawns conversion and constitutes a fraudulent practice; DOS fails its burden of proof to establish licensee failed to deposit trust funds in a segregated escrow account, engaged in fraud and changed business location without notice to DOS; restitution ordered in the amount of $ 1,900 plus interest, fine of $ 1,000 and any further application for licensure shall not be considered until applicant pays said fine and provides proof of payment of restitution