Yes much depends upon transport processes influencing
ozone content in those parts of the atmosphere where ultraviolet light is intercepted.
There is strong variation in
ozone content in the stratosphere (and the upper troposphere) between 30 ° and 60 ° south with large anomalies south of Australia and in the East Pacific.
Not exact matches
As shown
in previous studies, the litter from the polluted site, which had endured high levels of atmospheric nitrogen oxides and
ozone, had higher nitrogen
content than litter from the clean site.
While elevated
ozone did decrease the Phl p 5 allergen
content in pollen, «the strong CO2 - stimulation of pollen production suggests increased exposure to Timothy grass allergen overall,» even if O3 projections are realized, the authors note.
The key studies for MARCI center on daily monitoring of dust storms, polar cloud formation, and variations
in ozone content of the atmosphere.
Has realclimate ever done (or considered doing) an entry about the immense contribution that satellite measurements have made
in the past two - three decades,
in helping us to understand various components of the earth system (e.g., vegetation,
ozone, ice sheet mass, water vapor
content, temperature, sea level height, storms, aerosols, etc.)?
This increased water vapor appears to be participating
in the generation of PSCs which also affect the ztratospheric
ozone layer with the introduction of denitritification (the formation of NAD and NAT) which reduces both the
ozone content and reduces the removal of chlorine
in the polar regions.
No, the drop
in lower stratosphere
ozone content since the late 70s is well - correlated with the large volcanic eruptions of El Chichón (1982) and Pinatubo (1991):
In developing Asia, however, the sulfur content of fuels is much larger, so the impact of sulfate particles offsets the effect of changes in soot and ozone from transportation, leading to a net effect from short - lived pollutants that is quite smal
In developing Asia, however, the sulfur
content of fuels is much larger, so the impact of sulfate particles offsets the effect of changes
in soot and ozone from transportation, leading to a net effect from short - lived pollutants that is quite smal
in soot and
ozone from transportation, leading to a net effect from short - lived pollutants that is quite small.
In the process high
ozone content air is elevated to 1 hPa.
When the coupled circulation
in the Arctic injects
ozone into the troposphere it is working with high octane air
in terms of its
ozone content, much more than
in the southern hemisphere.
Follow the reasoning and you can see that the Antarctic vortex weakens during La Nina cooling events and stratospheric
ozone content will then rise
in the southern hemisphere.
Eddy Heat flux
in the extratropical northern winter lower stratosphere, that drives planetary waves is shown to vary with
ozone content.
The climate shift of 1978 involved a massive increase
in upper troposphere temperature at 30 ° latitude where
ozone content is highest.
The
ozone content of the atmosphere
in the northern hemisphere is more than
in the southern hemisphere.
It also addresses UNEP's work
in reducing the lead
content of fuels and paint, and tackling
ozone - depleting substances such as hydrochlorofluorocarbons and methyl bromide.
Response: The physical mechanisms for the CRE theory of the
ozone hole and the CFC warming theory have been given
in detail not only
in my new IJMPB paper but
in my 2010 Physics Reports and J of Cosmology papers [see the main
content of my paper
in the above].
Stephen Wilde says: April 27, 2010 at 4:43 pm I note that you are
content to rely on the AO (even without human CFCs) to regulate
ozone and you seem to concede that the AO is powerful enough
in that respect to dictate the temperature of the stratosphere.
Also, a causal dive into the above,
in Talhelm, et al, «Elevated carbon dioxide and
ozone alter productivity and ecosystem carbon
content in northern temperate forests», Global Change Biology, 2014, 20, 2492 - 2504.
However, my main point was not so much about the «make up» of
ozone but more about the possibility that as long as oxygen atoms and molecules absorb enough energy from UV radiation to alter their structure it may be that they also produce an increase
in their heat
content, which should be greater at any points nearest to the source — i.e..
See the first paper listed here: http://ljp.gcess.cn/dct/page/65558 that links change
in the
ozone content of the Arctic stratosphere to the ENSO phenomenon.