In contrast, the tropics, already warm, do not benefit from further warming, but they are not as hard hit by
ozone damage because ozone - precursor emissions are lower in the tropics.
Not exact matches
In September, the
ozone hole is at its largest
because the cold winter months coupled with the returning daylight permit stratospheric cloud formations that do the most
damage to the
ozone layer.
Emissions of
ozone - depleting chemicals in places like China are especially
damaging because of cold - air surges in East Asia that can quickly carry industrial pollution into the tropics.
That star, called Eta Carinae, could explode like SN 2006gy, which «probably wouldn't be good for Earth,» Corcoran says,
because the event could destroy communications satellites and
damage the planet's healing
ozone layer.
However, production will effectively end within the next 18 months
because of the
damage they do to the
ozone layer.
He also noted that the Montreal Protocol, as a side effect, has bought us about 10 years time in the climate issue,
because the now banned CFC's also have a greenhouse effect in addition to
damaging the
ozone layer.
China and South Asia, on the other hand, will see the most
ozone - related
damage to wheat, rice and soybean crops
because of the chronically high levels of toxic air pollution.
This occurs
because transportation in North America produces a substantial amount of black carbon (soot) and
ozone (a main ingredient in smog), both of which warm climate, while power generation leads to a large amount of sulfate particles, which cool climate even as they also lead to acid rain and
damage human health.
This is problematic
because ozone blocks harmful radiation — which can
damage DNA and lead to skin cancer, among other problems — from reaching the Earth's surface.
Since a sustainable future based on the continued extraction of coal, oil and gas in the «business - as - usual mode» will not be possible
because of both resource depletion and environmental
damages (as caused, e.g., by dangerous sea level rise) we urge our societies to -LSB-...] Reduce the concentrations of warming air pollutants (dark soot, methane, lower atmosphere
ozone, and hydrofluorocarbons) by as much as 50 % [and] cut the climate forcers that have short atmospheric lifetimes.
The ALA certainly does not disclose to voters that the Obama administration rejected any tightening of the federal
ozone standard in 2011
because of the economic
damage it would cause.
Other corporate giants like Du Pont are lowering their output of certain chemicals, the CFCs, that contribute to global warming, an action that began years ago
because some of the same chemicals
damage the
ozone layer.
The stratospheric
ozone layer contains 90 % of the world's known
ozone (Chasek et al 164), and is life giving
because it absorbs ultraviolet radiation, large amounts of which
damage all forms of life.
Of course that space tourism would be disapproved by environmental community
because such trips will
damage completely protective
ozone and we will be expecting inevitable convulsion of nature.