Sentences with phrase «ozone destruction as»

I think either mention ozone destruction as a current cause or say the subject is complicated and link here: http://www.atmosphere.mpg.de/enid/20c.html

«Anytime you introduce even initially unreactive surfaces into the stratosphere, you get reactions that ultimately result in ozone destruction as they are coated with sulfuric acid,» said Keutsch.

Not exact matches

Likewise, the production and destruction of oxygen, ozone, and methane is driven by chemical reactions powered by light, making the type of star important to consider as well.

The concentration of pollutants such as chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) represents one key factor in ozone destruction, but weather conditions impact the hole as well.

-- The Administrator may promulgate regulations to add to the list of class I and class II, group I, substances that may be destroyed for destruction offset credits, taking into account a candidate substance's carbon dioxide equivalent value, ozone depletion potential, prevalence in banks in the United States, and emission rates, as well as the need for additional cost containment under the class II, group II cap and the integrity of the class II, group II cap.

Our consumer behavior is immersed in a fatalistic dynamic with a destiny to climate change (deforestation, loss of biodiversity, ozone, etc.), and our own self - destruction as a species.

Note that although my original article referred primarily to solar protons I have since decided that the «culprit» is changes in the mix of all particles and wavelengths from the sun in so far as they affect the ozone creation / destruction process differentially at different heights in the atmosphere.

«A new mechanism accounts for the catalytic destruction of ozone in the absence of oxygen atoms.9 Rapid ozone loss begins as the first rays of sunlight illuminate the vortex in spring.

Requires the EPA Administrator to promulgate regulations establishing a program for the issuance of offset credits that: (1) ensure that such offset credits represent verifiable and additional GHG emission reductions or avoidance, or increases in sequestration; (2) ensure that offset credits issued for sequestration offset projects are only issued for GHG reductions that are permanent; and (3) include as reductions in GHGs reductions achieved through the destruction of methane and chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) or other ozone depleting substances.

«(5) include as reductions in greenhouse gases reductions achieved through the destruction of methane and its conversion to carbon dioxide, and reductions achieved through destruction of chlorofluorocarbons or other ozone depleting substances, if permitted by the Administrator under section 619 (b)(9) and subject to the conditions specified in section 619 (b)(9), based on the carbon dioxide equivalent value of the substance destroyed.

-- The Administrator may promulgate regulations to add to the list of class I and class II, group I, substances that may be destroyed for destruction offset credits, taking into account a candidate substance's carbon dioxide equivalent value, ozone depletion potential, prevalence in banks in the United States, and emission rates, as well as the need for additional cost containment under the class II, group II cap and the integrity of the class II, group II cap.

The entire publication devotes itself to only touchy - feely TOTALLY SAFE «lifestyle» issues that conveniently skirt around real hard - core «human» issues on the table such as SRM, catastrophic warming, Fukushima radiation, geoengineering fallout contamination, ozone destruction and so forth.

LOL yes, the world urgently needs Reagan - style conservatives who appreciate climate - change / CO2 science as wisely and foresightedly as Ronald Reagan appreciated ozone - destruction / CFC science!

It was only in the 1980's, with the confirmation of the destruction of the ozone layer, that the criticism took form as an undeniable proof that humanity is able to cause dramatic changes to the planet.

Later in the early summer as temperatures warm, the reaction slows down and the destruction of Ozone stops.

Examples of science fiction based on devastating climate change are Ready (1998), well - meaning but scarcely noticed; Turner (1989), a story of civilization collapsing under the pressures of war and economic forces as well as global warming (noted fairly widely for its literary quality); and, by two of the field's major authors, Silverberg (1994)(little noted), emphasizing the greed, stupidity and ambitions that were bringing vast destruction through ozone as well as global warming, and Sterling (1995), where colossal storms mingle with stormy political conspiracy.

On investigation I've found that it is somewhat speculative as to whether the ozone creation or ozone destruction processes are most energised by high solar activity.