Sentences with phrase «ozone hole did»

The death of the Grand Banks has done for the fishing industry what the Antarctic ozone hole did for the chemicals industry: scared everyone out of their complacency.

«Since they've descended on this blog to troll, I've found that many of the climate change skeptics here still think that tobacco has no link with cancer, still think that acid rain and the ozone hole don't exist, and still think that the DDT ban was just «The Man» trying to exert power over the little guy.

What are the Ozone holes doing?

Not exact matches

I live in Australia, skin cancer capital and right below the hole in the ozone layer, yet I still couldn't get enough vitamin d. No matter what I did, it took pregnancy vitamins + maximum vitamin d to get me to acceptable levels.

The ozone hole is the region where concentrations drop below 220 DU.

In September, the ozone hole is at its largest because the cold winter months coupled with the returning daylight permit stratospheric cloud formations that do the most damage to the ozone layer.

2012: Total ozone reached 124 DU on Oct. 1 and 136 DU on Oct. 5 with the hole covering 8.2 million square miles (equivalent to the area of North America).

The ozone hole plays a role in the stronger winds, but so does increasing temperature.

The team did observe an important outlier in the trend: In 2015, the ozone hole reached a record size, despite the fact that atmospheric chlorine continued to drop.

The world united to combat the ozone hole, can we do the same for climate change?

In «Don't Blind NASA to Earth's Climate» [Science Agenda], the editors refer to NASA as having «spotted a dangerous, growing hole» in the ozone layer in the 1980s.

THE EDITORS REPLY: The 1985 paper did document the existence of the ozone hole.

«We didn't expect to see such a deep and wide hole in terms of ozone.»

Earlier research showed that many simply didn't understand the problem — many confused it with the «ozone hole,» and thought buying a pump hair spray rather than the CFC spray would solve the problem.

Anyone can use these data to do their own analysis and make their own maps and models of the ozone hole and how it's recovering.

Do ozone hole related trends contradict longer term warming trends?

Don't you know that there's a hole in the ozone layer that's going to give you cancer and burn your face off?!? 1990s Sucker: What?!? Oh my God!

The reason may have to do with the cold Antarctic atmosphere handling moisture differently than the atmosphere over warmer regions.Part of the reason that Antarctica has barely warmed has to do with the ozone hole over the continent.

On the one hand, models do pretty well at capturing the poleward expansion in the Southern hemisphere but only if they include the effects of the Antarctic ozone hole!

Later he formed the George C. Marshall Institute which did the same for global warming and acid rain and the ozone hole.

The loudest objections and most frequent emails come from the folks who also tend to believe: * The USA did not land on the moon * There was a government conspiracy in the JFK assassination * Fluoride in our water supply is a method of government control * The world is only ~ 5,000 years old * CFC's have no impact on the ozone hole.

Indeed, according to many surveys, the ozone hole still resonates in the popular imagination — incorrectly — as a cause of global warming simply because it is so memorable and has something to do with the changing atmosphere.

Look, I do not claim that climate models are perfect — far from it — but their matches to observed data at the large scale are impressive — Pinatubo, last 30 years, response to ENSO, NAO response, sea ice response, ozone hole response etc..

And then I met Erik Conway, and Erik had made the link to what had happened over the ozone hole, and then we started doing research, started digging a little bit, found this link for Fred Seitz back to the tobacco industry, and that I remember very clearly because I remember that day, I called Erik on the phone and I said, «Erik, we need to write a book.»

The theory did not predict the Antarctic ozone hole and can not predict what will happen globally.

This was said to be related to tighter circulation patterns over Antarctica, I think to do with the ozone hole.

Your attempt to tweak the ozone hole explanation with a new twist also does not work... you say the ozone fails to absorb UV in the stratosphere, causing more sea ice to form in the winter.

Look at the «ozone hole» issue... where victory is claimed in healing the Antarctic ozone hole by banning of fluorocarbons although only some Western countries (such as US) banned the chemicalswhile other major users didn't.

Some years ago I asked the two leadimg ozone hole institutes whether or not there might always have been a fluctuating ozone hole as we have only been able to measure it from the 1950's and they said they did not think it likely but that it was possible.

Nick yes, but is the moral that there have always been sporadic ozone holes and we measured it at one of its peaks, or that the cause was correctly diagnosed and dealt with or that there might be things happening that we don't yet know about?

Did the Montreal Protocol fix the ozone hole?

Figure 2: Total column ozone loss relative to pre-ozone hole conditions in the 1970s in percent (left) and total number of molecules (right)(1 DU = 2.69 molecules / cm2) averaged over 2010 - 2019, during September for the Southern Hemisphere and March for the Northern Hemisphere.

These are large - scale waves, which travel through Earth's atmosphere similar to waves in the oceans (see «Why Does the Ozone Hole Vary in Size?»).

I predict that you will still support your heroism in saving the planet after the hoax goes mainstream, just like you did in the ozone hole scare.

As regards the ozone hole, as your link shows we do not know the historic measurements and do not know if we may have been trying to fix something that was not broken.

This has almost nothing to do with the environmental policy anymore, with problems such as deforestation or the ozone hole,» «We redistribute de facto the world's wealth by climate policy,» Ottmar Edenhofer, IPCC working group on Mitigation of Climate Change 2008 to 2015.

Minimum values of total ozone inside the ozone hole are close to 100 Dobson units (DU) compared with normal springtime values of about 300 DU -LSB-...].

Today, the ozone hole — actually a region of thinned ozone, not actually a pure hole — doesn't make headlines like it used to.

The Polar bears stubbornly refuse to go extinct, indeed the buggers are thriving, the glaciers don't appear to be disappearing, sea levels have stayed boringly level, we haven't been subsumed by hordes of desperate climate refugees, the polar ice caps haven't melted, the Great Barrier Reef is still with us, we haven't fought any resource wars, oil hasn't run out, the seas insist on not getting acidic, the rainforest is still around, islands have not sunk under the sea, the ozone holes haven't got bigger, the world hasn't entered a new ice age, acid rain appears to have fallen somewhere that can't quite be located, the Gulf Stream hasn't stopped, extreme weather events have been embarrassingly sparse in recent years and guess what?

By the way, how does the ozone hole strengthen ocean currents around Antarctica as stated in the answer to question 7?

Don't worry, they will wheel out the «Its the Ozone Hole thats causing the Antarctic to be cold» theory.

DDT imposed enormous costs through the destruction of ecosystems; acid rain, secondhand smoke, the ozone hole, and global warming did the same.

And it grew as acid rain and the ozone hole demonstrated that pollution traveled hundreds or even thousands of kilometres from its source, doing damage to people who did not benefit from the economic activity that produced it.

Some of the work at CERN seemed to say that cosmic rays nucleate very small droplets that do not increase to cloud size... Anyway, some of us follow GCR for reason of climate amplifications and even Ozone hole development.

The mother of the climate fraud is the ozone fraud which was able to convince us that localized and seasonal formation of regions with less than 200 DU of total ozone were «holes» of some sort and to further convince us that these «ozone holes» were evidence of global ozone depletion caused by the destruction of ozone by man made halogenated hydrocarbons.

Hahaha — And don't forget that the trees in question are in the NH, while the big bad ozone hole is in the SH.

Just as was done with the ozone hole and tobacco.

Don't forget that the stratosphere also is under the influence of decreasing CFCs [ozone hole recovering].

However we do observe the ozone hole growing when the sun is active and shrinking when the sun is less active which lends credence to the idea that we have been interfering with the natural processes with our CFCs

This is the normal situation (which is why you don't generally get an ozone hole in the arctic.