Some experts predicted that the depletion of
ozone in the stratosphere due to the exhausts from the SST would produce about 10,000 additional cases of skin cancer in the world.
Not exact matches
To what extent climate change
due to the emission of greenhouse gases may favor the formation of an «
ozone hole»
in the Arctic
stratosphere is an important topic of the POLSTRACC campaign.
In our
stratosphere, upper level warming is
due to
ozone absorption of solar radiation.
In the absence of ozone, there would be no well - defined stratosphere, but what we now call the stratosphere would also warm due to its increased opacity, and an increased upward flux from below in the CO2 wavelength
In the absence of
ozone, there would be no well - defined
stratosphere, but what we now call the
stratosphere would also warm
due to its increased opacity, and an increased upward flux from below
in the CO2 wavelength
in the CO2 wavelengths.
On the other hand both records have shown dramatic cooling
in the
stratosphere, where cooling is indeed expected
due to increasing greenhouse gases and decreasing
ozone (which heats the
stratosphere due to its absorption of solar ultraviolet radiation).
The chemical feedbacks
due to photolytic reactions
in both the
stratosphere and troposphere involving
ozone, NOx, and water vapour, can have significant impacts.
This is
due to the fact that the atmosphere warms with height
in the
stratosphere [because of the
ozone layer].
Due to the important role of
ozone in driving temperature changes
in the
stratosphere as well as radiative forcing of surface climate, several different groups have provided databases characterizing the time - varying concentrations of this key gas that can be used to force global climate change simulations (particularly for those models that do not calculate
ozone from photochemical principles).
Again (don't tell Santer) it's the Sun stupid: changes
in UV light has a direct influence on the
stratosphere due to more
Ozone and this results
in greater warming of the upper
stratosphere and swirling, wind - driving, convective atmospheric vortices that are known as weather.
It is
due to the proliferation of
ozone in the winter
stratosphere that the air
in the
stratosphere is warmer
in winter than it is
in summer.
The various kinds of evidence examined by the panel suggest that the troposphere actually may have warmed much less rapidly than the surface from 1979 into the late 1990s,
due both to natural causes (e.g., the sequence of volcanic eruptions that occurred within this particular 20 - year period) and human activities (e.g., the cooling of the upper part of the troposphere resulting from
ozone depletion
in the
stratosphere).
The wind patterns may have changed
due to a combination of the current Pacific Decadal Oscillation which has now started changing, and the
ozone hole allowing more sunlight to reach the surface rather than being absorbed
in the
stratosphere; the extra energy from this may have accelerated the winds.
Hypothetically (and the relationship is already well established statistically) the gamut of Mid Winter Warmings, Sudden Stratospheric Warmings and Final Warmings
in the Arctic
stratosphere depend upon the supply of
ozone rich air from mid latitudes being thrust into the Arctic
stratosphere where
ozone is normally
in a somewhat depleted state
due to erosive nitrogen compounds descending from the mesosphere,
in turn related to Particle Precipitation Events that are strongly related to geomagnetic influences and the solar wind.
This year, more
ozone has been lost over the Arctic
due to unusually cold temperatures
in the
stratosphere, and these have been fed by a stronger circulation pattern called the polar vortex throughout the winter, according to Ross Salawitch, a professor at the University of Maryland, and one of Rex's collaborators.
The
stratosphere has cooled because of
ozone loss
due to moisture arising
in tropical convection overshoot.
The result was a shock: at least 60 % of
ozone destruction at the poles seems to be
due to an unknown mechanism, Rex told a meeting of
stratosphere researchers
in Bremen, Germany, last week....
Chemically, there will be an increase
in ozone depletion (
due to increases
in heterogenous surface chemistry
in the
stratosphere), increases
in acid rain, possibly an increase
in high cirrus cloud cover
due to indirect effects of the sulphates on cloud lifetime.
Chemically, there will be an increase
in ozone depletion (
due to increases
in heterogeneous surface chemistry
in the
stratosphere), increases
in acid rain, possibly an increase
in high cirrus cloud cover
due to indirect effects of the sulphates on cloud lifetime.