Connecticut's legal conflicts with the federal government over air quality issues escalated again last weekwhen the state joined New York in a lawsuit against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for failing to enforce
ozone pollution rules.
Not exact matches
Another measure, the federal Cross-State Air
Pollution Rule, will require still more expensive controls on coal plants in the Midwest and South to reduce sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide emissions that travel across state lines, creating
ozone and fine particle
pollution downwind.
The
rule upheld today requires power plants in 28 states to clean up nitrogen oxide and sulfur dioxide
pollution that drifts across state borders and contributes to harmful soot (particles) and smog (
ozone)
pollution in downwind states.
The Senate GOP isn't far behind: In 2015, they floated a bill to cut the EPA's budget by 9 percent and block
rules on everything from ground - level
ozone pollution to climate change.
But his administration has also vowed to scale back an EPA
rule to limit ground - level
ozone pollution, as well as an Interior Department
rule to protect streams from coal - mining waste.
When these costs are added to health costs to individuals, the benefits of the EPA's upcoming Clean Air Transport
Rule, which would put tighter limits on
ozone pollution, «exceed compliance costs by about 100 times.»
Older coal plants will continue to be hamstrung by the cost of complying with non-climate
pollution rules (such as the
ozone air quality standards), plus the perhaps even lower price of natural gas.
There was a massive sense of betrayal amongst environmental and health groups after the Obama administration announced that it was delaying
ozone (or smog)
rules that would have greatly reduced
pollution.
On November 16, 2015, EPA proposed an update to the Cross-State Air
Pollution Rule (CSAPR) to address interstate transport of air
pollution under the 2008
ozone NAAQS.
Clean Power Plan; Waters of the United States
Rule; The 2015
ozone air
pollution standards.