Sentences with phrase «ozone standard of»

For example, in the Cincinnati - Dayton region, assuming an ozone standard of 70 ppb, production would decline by $ 14.8 billion, killing 91,700 jobs in 2030.

Not exact matches

Manufactured to ISO9001 and EEC standards of safety and design, the range includes: Water and wastewater screening; Grit removal and dewatering; Septic receival stations; Dissolved air flotation; Sedimentation systems and clarifiers; Shaftless conveyors; Sludge dewatering; Lime handling; and silo systems; Continuous sand filters; Microfilters and screens; Solar - powered circulation; UV disinfection; Ozone treatment; Anaerobic treatment.

She voted against legislation to delay implementation of federal ozone standards, and she voted in support of a spending bill for energy and water programs.

The EPA says Global Companies LLC, which operates a major crude oil ship - loading terminal at the Port of Albany, has run afoul of federal air pollution standards and has been emitting more ozone - producing compounds than they say they are.

SUN AUGUST 13 AT 6:00 PM — TUDOR PARK — LADY AND THE VAMPS (Pop / Rock cover band) @ Tudor Park, 133rd Avenue between 81st and 82nd Streets in Ozone Park Lady and the Vamps is a band that covers a range of genres from jazz standards like «Cheek to Cheek» to chart topping hits like «All About That Bass» The band has an impressive and unique sound and its members pride themselves on their technical abilities, improvisational skills, and musical versatility.

Although ozone pollution is dropping across many parts of the United States, western Europe and Japan, many people living in those countries still experience more than a dozen days every year in which levels of the lung irritant exceed health - based standards.

ven so, during 2010 - 2014 people in parts of California, Arizona, Colorado, Texas, the Midwest and the Middle Atlantic still experienced more than 15 days a year in which ozone levels exceeded the U.S. health - based air quality standard of 70 parts per billion (ppb) averaged over eight hours.

The region's levels of ozone and particulate matter, two pollutants caused by both automobiles and industry, exceed national air quality standards.

Average number of days per year (2010 - 2014 average) when ozone levels exceed the US health - based air quality standard of 70 parts per billion (ppb) averaged over eight hours, at non-urban and urban sites.

The county also exceeds the federal standard for ozone, the main ingredient of smog.

On July 12 a coalition filed suit against the EPA for its recently announced delay in the implementation of new public health — based standards for ozone pollution, on grounds similar to the methane challenge.

Starting in 2010, EPA experienced a series of delays in issuing a proposal to tighten the 75 - ppb ozone standard, which was set during George W. Bush's presidency.

«Increasing background ozone from rising Asian emissions leaves less room for local production of ozone before the federal standard is violated,» said lead author Meiyun Lin, a research scholar in the Program in Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences at Princeton University and a scientist at GFDL.

In July last year, in an attempt to reduce demand for elec - tricity, a group of power companies offered the prize to the first company to build a prototype fridge that would use at least 25 per cent less electricity than current standards demand while using no ozone - depleting CFCs.

Given the pre-Thanksgiving rollout of EPA's new ozone standards, several environmental reporters joked that the agency's midsummer time frame will lead to rules being proposed on Friday, July 3 (Greenwire, Nov. 26, 2014).

In 2011, 231 counties in the U.S. exceeded the EPA's regulatory standards for ozone, the main component of smog.

«We also welcome EPA's proposal of a separate standard to protect forests from ozone damage,» Baron said.

Such a standard would be based on a cumulative, weighted total of daily 12 - hour ozone exposures to plants and crops over a three - month period.

RE «He also includes standard statements implying that scientists implicated CFCs in ozone depletion to deprive the developing world of refrigeration»

As noted above, the first three metrics are associated with regulatory standards in different world regions for the protection of human health to acute or short - term exposure to ozone.

All of their materials meet a standard called CertiPUR - US which means they are analyzed by an independent, accredited testing laboratory and found to be free of ozone depletes, PBDE flame retardants, heavy metals, formaldehyde and phthalates.

The 1994 Mitsubishis will have driver's side air bags and, depending on the model, optional or standard ozone - friendly air conditioners.The»94 Diamante will receive a standard passenger's side air bag as well as new taillamps and five - spoke wheels.The Mighty Max trucks will have side - impact door beams and center high - mounted stop lights in» 94, while the Montero sports - utility will get a third row of seats.

Applying six different models here, we estimate that CH4, NOx, CO and NMVOCs are respectively responsible for 44 ± 12 % (± 1 standard deviation range), 31 ± 9 %, 15 ± 3 % and 9 ± 2 % of the 1850s — 2000s ozone RF (Table 10).»

I'm not going to address all of them, but some of the most significant would impact hydraulic fracturing, ozone standards, methane controls and the next five - year plan covering access to offshore areas.

«I expect it will be a large source of ozone precursors, and this would be located in an area that's already failing to meet federal health - based standards for ozone,» he said.

They indicate that higher ozone concentrations, even at levels below current air quality standards in most of the world, have significant negative effects on worker productivity.

Health - related costs of the current effects of ozone air pollution exceeding national standards have been estimated at $ 6.5 billion (in 2008 U.S. dollars) nationwide, based on a U.S. assessment of health impacts from ozone levels during 2000 to 2002.153,154

A quick estimate suggests that a 10 ppb reduction in the ozone standard would translate into an annual cost saving of approximately $ 1.1 billion in labor expenditure.

As ozone is a byproduct of fossil fuel pollutants, industries such as manufacturers and oil refiners that are energy - intensive are expected to be hurt the most by the standard.

The standards governing ozone — the main component of harmful smog — are supposed to be set every five years.

Provides for designation of transitional areas under implementation plans and states requirements for emissions inventories, the attainment of standards by the end of 2015, and penalties for not meeting the eight - hour ozone or fine particles standard.

Health - related costs of the current effects of ozone air pollution exceeding national standards have been estimated at $ 6.5 billion (in 2008 U.S. dollars) nationwide, based on a U.S. assessment of health impacts from ozone levels during 2000 — 2002.

Researcher Qian Di and colleagues find that particulate matter and ozone kills thousands of people every year, even at levels below the federal standard.

The EPA's 2015 rulemaking, which set the new ozone standards at 70 parts per billion, could quadruple the number of counties defined as being in non-attainment to 958.

Pace the phrase «any air pollutant,» everything in § 115 points to it being meant to apply only to NAAQS pollutants, i.e., those for which EPA has established a «National Ambient Air Quality Standard»: a numerical value representing the appropriate atmospheric concentration of ozone, particulate matter, etc..

After promulgation of the current ozone standard in 2008, EPA, two years later, called a temporary halt to the nationwide implementation of the standard in response to the severe recession prevailing at the time.

In 2013, the Government of Canada established more stringent and comprehensive outdoor air quality standards for fine particulate matter (a component of which is black carbon) and ground - level ozone.

After years of delay, the Obama Administration faced a court - ordered December 1 deadline to update the current 2008 standard on ground - level ozone, a by - product of burning fossil fuels.

Now, they are coming for oil and gas development and manufacturing through the just - announced 626 - page ozone regulations, which will require states to dramatically reduce ozone emissions from the current 75 parts per billion (ppb) to a range of 65 to 70 ppb — though environmental groups want a 60 ppb standard, which may be the final rule.

«Republicans,» according to National Journal, «have vowed to target the ozone standard as a part of their early energy agenda.»

Likewise, a NAM report, titled «Potential Economic Impacts of a Stricter Ozone Standard,» states that a majority of new reductions would have to come from «unknown controls.»

«To meet the new standards,» the National Journal says: «states will have to form plans that will limit emissions of ozone - forming pollutants from two major sources: stationary sources such as power plants and factories, and transportation» — which will reduce energy intensive economic activity.

The ALA certainly does not disclose to voters that the Obama administration rejected any tightening of the federal ozone standard in 2011 because of the economic damage it would cause.

A combination of industry innovation, market forces and existing standards have proven effective for keeping hydraulic fracturing safe and reducing emissions of ozone, methane and carbon.

Soon EPA is expected to unveil more restrictive standards on ozone that could be the most costly regulation ever, potentially putting about half of the United States in non-attainment, impacting GDP and employment on a national scale.

In 2015, the EPA set the standard for ground - level ozone, one of the most common criteria pollutants, at 70 parts per billion (ppb), a standard at the lenient - end of the range recommended by EPA's scientific advisory committee.

Interestingly, EPA announced on Tuesday - Election Day - that it would postpone the release of the new ozone standard until the end of the year.

In 2015, the EPA set the standard for ground - level ozone, one of the most common criteria pollutants, at 70 parts per billion (ppb), a standard at the lenient - end of the range

One of the most damaging to the economy is the new ozone standard which, according to a recent study, could destroy as many as 7.3 million U.S. jobs.

Older coal plants will continue to be hamstrung by the cost of complying with non-climate pollution rules (such as the ozone air quality standards), plus the perhaps even lower price of natural gas.